Uso de periódicos científicos eletrônicos por docentes e pós-graduandos do Instituto de Geociências da USP

Oliveira, Érica Beatriz Pinto Moreschi de

doi:10.1590/s0100-19652007000300007

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As publicações difundiram-se entre 17 periódicos diferentes, destacando-se a Revista Árvore, que foi responsável por efetuar a publicação de 14 artigos selecionados por esta pesquisa. De acordo com os parâmetros estabelecidos pelo sistema de classificação científica Qualis Capes (Oliveira, 2008), quatro dos artigos selecionados foram publicados em periódicos considerados de excelência internacional, sendo três classificados como Qualis A1 e um como Qualis A2. No entanto, a maior parte dos artigos selecionados integraram revistas científicas com nível de excelência nacional -seis B1 e dois B2.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

A sentinela sob a sombra das árvores: uma revisão integrativa da segurança do trabalho no setor florestal brasileiro

Santos¹

2023

CCT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esta revisão integrativa teve o objetivo de delinear um panorama da produção científica – desenvolvida durante o período de 2006 a 2021 – sobre o tema da segurança do trabalho no setor florestal brasileiro. O levantamento foi realizado em novembro de 2021 e seguiu alguns critérios de inclusão/exclusão predefinidos. A busca se concentrou nas bases de dados das plataformas digitais SciELO e Google Acadêmico, tendo gerado um universo total de 105 artigos consultados e 23 selecionados. Os resultados obtidos indicaram que há um déficit no volume de estudos sobre o referido tema, bem como uma distribuição pouco uniforme das publicações entre os estados e ao longo do tempo; além disso, a maior parte dos artigos publicados centraram esforços em aspectos laborais relacionados às atividades de implantação, manutenção e colheita florestal.

show abstract

Section: Resultsunclassified

A sentinela sob a sombra das árvores: uma revisão integrativa da segurança do trabalho no setor florestal brasileiro

Santos¹

2023

CCT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Peer reviewer: what commitment is that?

Gerhardt¹,

Pai²,

Gouveia³

et al. 2014

Rev. Gaúcha Enferm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Journals are the medium of excellence for intellectually disseminating academic production and scientifi c advancements, and today they may be considered the main providers/judges of scientifi c merit for most fi elds of knowledge. In this process, reviewing papers and selecting those that fulfi ll the criteria of ethical integrity, scientifi c quality, and relevance for professional practice are a responsibility shared by journal publishers and their reviewers. Starting in the late 1990s, the Brazilian academic-scientifi c community has benefi tted from a signifi cant expansion in the access to and dissemination of scientifi c information, a fact related mostly to the increased number of titles available in electronic format (1). Such growth came along with a host of other challenges, among which we have the makeup of the team of reviewers for such journals. Being an ad hoc reviewer/editor is a role that requires people to dedicate their time and knowledge, as well as be committed and responsible towards the advancement of science. However, this activity is undervalued at times, given its anonymity and somewhat unclear benefi ts. Another relevant issue is that journals need to have expert reviewers capable of adding quality to the publications, both in terms of the practical contributions from their assessment of the merit of papers submitted and their infl uence on journal rating (Qualis) by the Coordination of Support for Higher Education Personnel (Coordenação de Apoio ao Pessoal de Nível Superior-CAPES). As a result, there emerge specifi c requirements for putting together a team of reviewers, which must be staff ed by top researchers specializing either in the topic addressed or the literature and methods evaluated. By mastering the knowledge and practice in their specialties, reviewers can off er authors precious advice (2). In the context of scientifi c journals, the offi cial academic paper analysis process conducted by reviewers is peer review, in which the identity of reviewers and authors is kept confi dential. In this process, the peers collaborate with the publisher's eff orts to identify studies that are scientifi cally rigorous and ethical, as well as relevant for the practice and advancement of knowledge. Journal publishers must clearly let reviewers know what their roles and duties are, and especially about the confi dential nature of the document submitted for evaluation (3) , to guarantee the quality of the review by making sure the peers are impartial, objective, and meet deadlines. From this standpoint, it is suitable to expect publishers to regularly monitor the performance of their reviewers and stop requesting reviews from those who repeatedly deliver work that lacks quality and/or is not constructive, or miss deadlines (3,4). Meeting review completion deadlines is an important aspect of the peer-review process. When reviewers accept an invitation and fail to fi nish their work on time, the review process becomes longer and the authors' become more anxious as they wait for a reply on thei...

show abstract

Mapeamento sistemático na base de dados em Ciência da Informação

Anna

2018

BRAJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Palavras-chave: Produção científica. Periódico científico. Periódico científico eletrônico. Avaliação de periódico. Indicadores de qualidade em periódicos. AbstractIt brings to light some indicators on the intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of scientific journals. It aims to present a mapping of the scientific production on the topic scientific journals, focusing on the articles of periodicals present in the Database in Information Science. The method adopted was systematic mapping, which showed heterogeneity in the number of articles published over the years; homogeneity in the number of publications in the journals, with a marked discrepancy in only one journal; prevalence of collective authorship with high index of differentiation with individual authorship; preference for mixed methods of research; and finally, a diversity of subjects was observed, and aspects related to scientific communication, electronic periodicals, periodicals portals, usability and electronic system of periodical publishing appear as recurring subjects. It was concluded that, even though it is an issue in vogue, given its contribution to science and the new paradigms imposed by the appearance of the electronic journal, efforts must be made to ensure the continuous qualification and improvement of these publications. Actions should also be undertaken to provide greater legitimacy, reliability, and security in editorial processes, so as to increase the visibility, use, and recognition of journals as the principal and reliable means of scientific communication for the twenty-first century.

show abstract

Uso de periódicos científicos eletrônicos por docentes e pós-graduandos do Instituto de Geociências da USP

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

A sentinela sob a sombra das árvores: uma revisão integrativa da segurança do trabalho no setor florestal brasileiro

A sentinela sob a sombra das árvores: uma revisão integrativa da segurança do trabalho no setor florestal brasileiro

Peer reviewer: what commitment is that?

Mapeamento sistemático na base de dados em Ciência da Informação

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About