2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural validity of the demand-control questionnaire: Swedish and Brazilian workers

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Demand-Control Questionnaire, comparing the original Swedish questionnaire with the Brazilian version.METHODS We compared data from 362 Swedish and 399 Brazilian health workers. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were performed to test structural validity, using the robust weighted least squares mean and variance-adjusted (WLSMV) estimator. Construct validity, using hypotheses testing, was evaluated through the inspection of the mean score dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Brazilian version of the DCSQ demonstrated internal consistency with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88, 0.87, and 0.86 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.72, 0.63, and 0.86 for the dimensions psychological job demands, job control, and social support at work, respectively 34) . The dimensional structure of this instrument has been assessed by studies conducted with different occupational groups [35][36][37] .…”
Section: Exposure: Job Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian version of the DCSQ demonstrated internal consistency with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.88, 0.87, and 0.86 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.72, 0.63, and 0.86 for the dimensions psychological job demands, job control, and social support at work, respectively 34) . The dimensional structure of this instrument has been assessed by studies conducted with different occupational groups [35][36][37] .…”
Section: Exposure: Job Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] However, certain studies have produced inconsistent data when evaluating JCQ subscales and have indicated the need for more detailed investigations into the interactions between its main dimensions and its subscales. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The various JCQ versions and methodologies used to evaluate JSM constructs present challenges of a psychometric nature. In this context, the construct is taken as a hypothesis or an explanation for a specific performance in relation to the results achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Repetitive work" presented low factor loading and, for this reason, it was removed from the model. This item has shown irregular performance compared with the other items from the "Skill Discretion" subscale (Niedhammer, 2002;Li et al, 2004;Eum et al, 2006;Hökerberg et al, 2010;Chungkham et al, 2013;Hökerberg et al, 2014). In several contexts, repetitive work is more directly associated to the perception of job demands than to a component from the autonomy dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The permanence of the social support dimension and its subscales in the JCQ has been discussed (Sale & Kerr, 2002;Sanne, Torp, Mykletun, & Dahl, 2005;Hökerberg et al, 2010;Chungkham et al, 2013;Hökerberg et al, 2014), and most authors approved their preservation in the model (Li et al, 2004;Edimansyah et al, 2006;Eum et al, 2006;Niedhammer et al, 2006;Araújo & Karasek, 2008;Phakthongsuk & Apakupakul, 2008;Choobineh et al, 2011;Chungkham et al, 2013;Nehzat et al, 2014). Psychometric evaluations revealed consistent and coherent measurements for the construct evaluated with these subscales, in both studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation