2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012005000018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroke caused auditory attention deficits in children

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To verify the auditory selective attention in children with stroke. METHODS: Dichotic tests of binaural separation (non-verbal and consonant-vowel) and binaural integration - digits and Staggered Spondaic Words Test (SSW) - were applied in 13 children (7 boys), from 7 to 16 years, with unilateral stroke confirmed by neurological examination and neuroimaging. RESULTS: The attention performance showed significant differences in comparison to the control group in both kinds of tests. In the non-verbal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this test, as it is a dichotic presentation and it uses verbal stimuli, it would be expected a greater number of errors with the ear contralateral to the lesion or deficits in both ears when the lesion involved only the left hemisphere, as observed in adults 14,16,17 . In our study, this pattern was predominant, but we also observed ipsilateral deficits both in right and left hemisphere lesions, similar in Isaacs et al 18 and a previous study by Elias and Moura-Ribeiro 7 . In both studies, the diversity of the results was related to the variables of the lesion, while Isaacs et 18 consider in particular, the presence of epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this test, as it is a dichotic presentation and it uses verbal stimuli, it would be expected a greater number of errors with the ear contralateral to the lesion or deficits in both ears when the lesion involved only the left hemisphere, as observed in adults 14,16,17 . In our study, this pattern was predominant, but we also observed ipsilateral deficits both in right and left hemisphere lesions, similar in Isaacs et al 18 and a previous study by Elias and Moura-Ribeiro 7 . In both studies, the diversity of the results was related to the variables of the lesion, while Isaacs et 18 consider in particular, the presence of epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding auditory function, there are few studies involving childhood stroke in complete contrast to the relevance that this function assumes for the language and for learning. In this research area, Elias and Moura-Ribeiro 7 found deficits in auditory selective attention in stroke children. Another study, involving neonatal stroke, revealed difficulty of comprehension, which refers to the in-depth evaluation of the auditory function 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the first three selected descriptors were inserted in each database for the present study, there was a total of 15 studies (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) . One study (8) was excluded because it was repeated in the search in PubMed, hence there were 14 studies left.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three papers (8)(9)(10) were selected in the first search and one paper (22) in the second. All the studies that evaluated children diagnosed with stroke were read in full.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auditory attention was evaluated by the binaural separation, NVD and consonant-vowel tests, and also by the integration, SSW and dichotic listening tests, being possible the verification of the relationship between the CVA and the deficit in selective attention in both tasks with verbal and non-verbal stimuli 18 . The Auditory Processing Disorder can also be influenced by structural and/or functional alterations in childhood, such as Cleft Lip and Palate, Oral Breathing, Dysphonia and Visual impairment, according to the studies indicated in Figure 4.…”
Section: Worst Performance Of G1mentioning
confidence: 99%