2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding process in delayed recall impairment and rate of forgetting in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of impaired encoding in learning and in delayed recall disturbances, and to evaluate the rate of forgetting in AD. METHOD: Fifteen AD patients with mild or moderate dementia and 15 normal matched controls were assessed with the Buschke Selective Reminding Test. Delayed recall was evaluated after 30 minutes and after 24 hours. RESULTS: AD patients had a poorer performance across the six trials of the learning phase as well as in both delayed recall evaluations, with no difference b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been some debate whether increased forgetting rates in AD and aMCI may be a function of impaired learning with intact consolidation (Mayes, 1986), resulting in normal rates of forgetting once information is learned (Becker, Boller, Saxton, & McGonigle-Gibson, 1987; Christensen, Kopelman, Stanhope, Lorentz, & Owen, 1998; Degenszajn, Caramelli, Caixeta, & Nitrini, 2001; Freed, Corkin, & Cohen, 1987; Kopelman, 1985). Alternatively, as we hypothesize individuals with aMCI or AD have an increased rate of forgetting (Budson et al, 2007; Christensen et al, 1998; Greenaway et al, 2006; Kramer et al, 2004; Larrabee, Youngjohn, Sudilovsky, & Crook, 1993; Manes, Serrano, Calcagno, Cardozo, & Hodges, 2008; McBride et al, 2002; Reed, Paller, & Mungas, 1998), even when initial encoding is controlled for (Christensen et al, 1998; Hart, Kwentus, Harkins, & Taylor, 1988; Larrabee et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been some debate whether increased forgetting rates in AD and aMCI may be a function of impaired learning with intact consolidation (Mayes, 1986), resulting in normal rates of forgetting once information is learned (Becker, Boller, Saxton, & McGonigle-Gibson, 1987; Christensen, Kopelman, Stanhope, Lorentz, & Owen, 1998; Degenszajn, Caramelli, Caixeta, & Nitrini, 2001; Freed, Corkin, & Cohen, 1987; Kopelman, 1985). Alternatively, as we hypothesize individuals with aMCI or AD have an increased rate of forgetting (Budson et al, 2007; Christensen et al, 1998; Greenaway et al, 2006; Kramer et al, 2004; Larrabee, Youngjohn, Sudilovsky, & Crook, 1993; Manes, Serrano, Calcagno, Cardozo, & Hodges, 2008; McBride et al, 2002; Reed, Paller, & Mungas, 1998), even when initial encoding is controlled for (Christensen et al, 1998; Hart, Kwentus, Harkins, & Taylor, 1988; Larrabee et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, AD patients do not seem to benefit from deeper encoding (i.e. semantic processing) and exhibit a flat pattern of recognition across all conditions (Corkin, 1982;see also, Grober, Ocepek-Welikson, & Teresi, 2009;Degenszajn, Caramelli, Caixeta, & Nitrini, 2001;Tounsi et al, 1999). Furthermore, semantic cueing is not as useful in patients as in healthy older adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction time on STADP showed a significant correlation (r=0.28; p=0.006) with Neuropsi Figure reaction time and an inverse correlation with proverb recognition (r= -0.26; p=0.01). The STADP memories also interfered in reaction time: episodic memory (r= -0.36; p=0.000), short-term memory (r= -0.34; p=0.01) as well as in proverb recognition, requested after a mean of forty minutes: episodic memory (r=0.37; p=0.000) and shortterm memory (r=0.28; p=0.007), pointing to better performance from those who better codified the information 30 . The same occurred with the total score on STADP (r=0.32; p=0.002).…”
Section: Mmse-total Maximum=30mentioning
confidence: 99%