2016
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise perceptivo-auditiva de vozes rugosas e soprosas: correspondência entre a escala visual analógica e a escala numérica

Abstract: RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar os valores de corte dos diferentes graus de rugosidade e soprosidade vocal em uma escala visual analógica, a partir de uma escala numérica. Métodos: Foram selecionadas 150 vozes, de indivíduos de ambos os gêneros, com qualidade variando desde a ausência de rugosidade e de soprosidade até a presença desses parâmetros em grau intenso. A avaliação perceptivo-auditiva foi realizada por quatro fonoaudiólogas especialistas em voz, com a utilização da escala visual analógica de 100 mm e da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Visual analogue scales are more sensitive to minor differences and present greater agreement among experts. 31 One study that compared visual analogue scales with Likert scales showed that VAS are less vulnerable to misunderstandings, in addition to presenting advantages with regard to response time, that is, they are faster to respond. 20 In the content validation, the experts suggested alterations in some items in order to improve clarity and increase the scale's comprehensiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Visual analogue scales are more sensitive to minor differences and present greater agreement among experts. 31 One study that compared visual analogue scales with Likert scales showed that VAS are less vulnerable to misunderstandings, in addition to presenting advantages with regard to response time, that is, they are faster to respond. 20 In the content validation, the experts suggested alterations in some items in order to improve clarity and increase the scale's comprehensiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondence between cut grade and moderate and severe deviations was considered using an analogic visual scale as follows: for roughness, values ranging from 28.5 to 59.5 and from 59.5 to 100 were adopted as moderately deviant and severely deviant, respectively; for breathiness, values from 33.5 to 52.5 and from 52.5 to 100 were adopted as moderately deviant and severely deviant, respectively (15) . The results regarding sustained emission of the vowel /a/ found for the two elderly individuals (I1 and I2) who participated in the therapeutic proposal showed moderately deviant (I1) and severely deviant (I2) roughness at the Pre moment, moderately deviant roughness for both individuals at the PI and PT moments, with increased values at the PT moment but smaller than those observed at the Pre moment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por fim, foi mensurado, também por meio de uma EVA de 100mm, o grau de desvio vocal para o parâmetro em que foi classificada anteriormente (R ou B). Os valores encontrados para o desvio vocal das vozes classificadas como R ou B por meio da EVA, foram convertidos segundo sugerido pela literatura (22) , conforme apresentado na Tabela 1.…”
Section: Seleção Das Emissões Vocais âNcoras Para O Treinamentounclassified