2017
DOI: 10.1590/1983-80422017252183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribuições para planejamento e avaliação do ensino da bioética

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to present a reflection on the teaching of bioethics and its evaluation in degree and post-graduate courses in the area of health, considering the possible educational objectives of such teaching. The contents, methods, and techniques of teaching must be suitable for the educational stage in which the student is inserted. Theoretical content, the so-called "toolbox" of bioethics, is of particular importance, and should be suitable for the level and objectives of the training. Att… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
11
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Good correct answer rates were also achieved by G1 undergraduates in palliative care scenarios, physician autonomy, abortion and ligation, medical confidentiality and especially in psychiatric issues. In the case involving medical records and its confidentiality, the difference in correct answers between G1 and G2 was less than 2.5%, justified by passive learning of the entire sample in emergency rooms, outpatient clinics, hospitals and even on group talks between professionals and colleagues 2,4,7,28 . However, deficiencies in formal ethics teaching are visible, being insufficient for the learning of a subject so complex 1,2,30,32 .…”
Section: Dilemmas Section In Clinical Casesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Good correct answer rates were also achieved by G1 undergraduates in palliative care scenarios, physician autonomy, abortion and ligation, medical confidentiality and especially in psychiatric issues. In the case involving medical records and its confidentiality, the difference in correct answers between G1 and G2 was less than 2.5%, justified by passive learning of the entire sample in emergency rooms, outpatient clinics, hospitals and even on group talks between professionals and colleagues 2,4,7,28 . However, deficiencies in formal ethics teaching are visible, being insufficient for the learning of a subject so complex 1,2,30,32 .…”
Section: Dilemmas Section In Clinical Casesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is essential to seize concepts of medical ethics in training, given their extreme need in the preparation of physicians 5,21,[35][36][37][38] when establishing ethical conduct in the scientific, technological, biological and health fields 2,7 . However, this research revealed low overall performance of G1, which, when added to the cases of superior performance of G2, shows that the instruction of students, even among those who attended at least one of the two disciplines that address medical ethics, is insufficient to deal with other dilemmas.…”
Section: Dilemmas Section In Clinical Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations