2016
DOI: 10.1590/1980-4415v30n54a11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conocimiento Especializado de un Profesor de Álgebra Lineal y Espacios de Trabajo Matemático

Abstract: Resumen En este trabajo indagamos sobre las posibles relaciones entre los resultados del análisis de una sesión de clase con dos modelos teóricos: el modelo Mathematics Teacher’s Specialised Knowledge (MTSK) y los Espacios de Trabajo Matemático (ETM). De este modo, discutimos el conocimiento especializado (MTSK) que evidencia en una sesión sobre la multiplicación de matrices un profesor universitario de álgebra lineal y el espacio de trabajo matemático (ETM) idóneo del profesor en esta sesión. El conocimiento … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing mainly on those subdomains and categories that have emerged in the analysis of the classroom session: The Knowledge of Topics (KoT) is defined as a well-founded and deep knowledge of mathematical content. It consists of the following categories: phenomenology and applications, which is the knowledge of models attributable to a topic, as well as the uses and applications of a mathematical topic (Escudero-Ávila, Carrillo, Flores-Medrano, Climent, Contreras, & Montes, 2015); definitions, properties and their foundations, comprises the knowledge to describe or characterize a concept, the properties of a mathematical object, and the knowledge that the teacher has about the bases, foundations or completeness of the use of a property; representation registers, refers to knowledge about the different ways in which a topic can be represented, including the notation and the mathematical language associated with such representations (Mora, Climent, Escudero-Ávila, Montes, & Ribeiro, 2016); and procedures, where we consider the knowledge that the professor has about conventional and alternative algorithms (How is it done? ), the sufficient and necessary conditions to proceed (When can it be done?…”
Section: / 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing mainly on those subdomains and categories that have emerged in the analysis of the classroom session: The Knowledge of Topics (KoT) is defined as a well-founded and deep knowledge of mathematical content. It consists of the following categories: phenomenology and applications, which is the knowledge of models attributable to a topic, as well as the uses and applications of a mathematical topic (Escudero-Ávila, Carrillo, Flores-Medrano, Climent, Contreras, & Montes, 2015); definitions, properties and their foundations, comprises the knowledge to describe or characterize a concept, the properties of a mathematical object, and the knowledge that the teacher has about the bases, foundations or completeness of the use of a property; representation registers, refers to knowledge about the different ways in which a topic can be represented, including the notation and the mathematical language associated with such representations (Mora, Climent, Escudero-Ávila, Montes, & Ribeiro, 2016); and procedures, where we consider the knowledge that the professor has about conventional and alternative algorithms (How is it done? ), the sufficient and necessary conditions to proceed (When can it be done?…”
Section: / 15mentioning
confidence: 99%