2021
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232021269.2.24332019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uso de contracepção e desigualdades do planejamento reprodutivo das mulheres brasileiras

Abstract: Resumo O Brasil apresentou elevada queda de fecundidade nas últimas décadas. No entanto, diferenças sociodemográficas ainda impactam diretamente no acesso ao planejamento reprodutivo no país. O objetivo deste artigo é estimar a prevalência do uso de métodos contraceptivos (MC) de acordo com variáveis sociodemográficas entre mulheres brasileiras em idade reprodutiva. Trata-se de um estudo transversal que utilizou dados secundários de 17.809 mulheres que responderam à Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde. Estimou-se a pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0
26

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] This result followed the Brazilian profile, in which IUD is used by <2% of the Brazilian women of reproductive age. [34] The proportion of FSW who had up to 2 childbirths (66.5%) was similar to the proportion of childbirths among Brazilian women aged 18 to 49 years, estimated in PNS-2013 (69.9%) (PNS, 2013). However, the proportion of FSW with up to 2 children alive (59.9%) was lower than the one estimated in PNS-2013 (73.2%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[36] This result followed the Brazilian profile, in which IUD is used by <2% of the Brazilian women of reproductive age. [34] The proportion of FSW who had up to 2 childbirths (66.5%) was similar to the proportion of childbirths among Brazilian women aged 18 to 49 years, estimated in PNS-2013 (69.9%) (PNS, 2013). However, the proportion of FSW with up to 2 children alive (59.9%) was lower than the one estimated in PNS-2013 (73.2%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The type of method used differs from the Brazilian female population profile: while oral contraceptive is the most used method by the Brazilian female population, male condom is the most used by FSW. [ 34 ] The proportion of FSW who use condoms in all vaginal sexual intercourse with steady partners was low, of 34.8%, and with clients, much higher, of 80.5%, indicating the influence of condom use by FSW for prevention HIV infection and other STI and the poor access to contraceptive methods. Although IUD is an effective contraceptive method available free of charge in primary health care in Brazil, [ 35 ] the frequency of IUD use was low, approximately 6 times lower than in Russia, where 9.0% of FSW choose this contraceptive method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we could not determine whether better educated women have been controlling and postponing fertility more than their less educated counterparts during the COVID-19 pandemic. We may speculate that young women from low socio-economic backgrounds are especially likely to rely on contraception methods provided by public health services (Gonc ¸alves et al, 2019;Martins et al, 2006;Trindade et al, 2021), and thus that the number of births among this group will increase in the near future, as they have difficulties accessing reproductive health services during the pandemic. Additionally, previous studies have found inequalities in the age distribution of first births, with the fertility curve showing two peaks at the ages of 20 and 30 years old: the first for the lower socio-economic group and the second for the higher socio-economic group (Lima et al, 2018;Rios-Neto et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EmSlywitch et al (2021), mostrou-se que entre 72 mulheres que utilizaram dispositivos intrauterinos, e que trabalhavam no manuseio de aparelhos de ressonância magnética, 68 apresentaram sangramento abdominal anormal; na revisão sistemática realizada emTi et al (2020), foi verificado que o uso de dispositivo intrauterino provocou sangramentos e dores abdominais em 04 entre cada 100 mulheres, acarretando assim a descontinuidade no uso desses dispositivos; já emSanders et al (2018), foram observados sangramentos causados pelo uso de dispositivos intrauterinos de cobre, logo após as suas inserções nos úteros das mulheres. Quanto ao ganho de peso feminino, outros trabalhos também apresentaram resultados semelhantes, como emLuz, Barros & Branco (2021); Fierro-Calpa (2021) eTrindade, Siqueira, Paula & Mendes (2021), que demonstraram que uso dos dispositivos intrauterinos hormonais apresentaram como um dos efeitos adversos, ganho de peso em mulheres. Em relação à migração ou expulsão do dispositivo, autores como Adeyemi-Fowode & Bercaw-Pratt (2019), identificaram através de estudo comparativo (coorte), que por meio de uma amostra contendo 281 adolescentes e 571 mulheres entre 20 a 30 anos, permitiram a eles concluir que a mulheres (e/ou adolescentes) que…”
unclassified