2016
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00047215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary quality varies according to data collection instrument: a comparison between a food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the agreement between the Brazilian Healthy Eating Index -Revised (BHEI-R), estimated by a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and multiple 24-hour recalls (24h-R)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 24-h recall method is rapid to apply and requires only short-time memory, which contributes to better respondent adherence and data quality [84, 85]. However, some limitations remain such as misreporting due to interviewees' bias and forgetfulness [86, 87]. In order to minimize such bias, the Multiple Pass Method was used to assist the interviewee in recalling and detailing his/her food report by five steps, including quick list, forgotten food list, time and occasion, detailed cycle, and final review probe [33, 88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 24-h recall method is rapid to apply and requires only short-time memory, which contributes to better respondent adherence and data quality [84, 85]. However, some limitations remain such as misreporting due to interviewees' bias and forgetfulness [86, 87]. In order to minimize such bias, the Multiple Pass Method was used to assist the interviewee in recalling and detailing his/her food report by five steps, including quick list, forgotten food list, time and occasion, detailed cycle, and final review probe [33, 88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazilian children and adolescents with lower plasma status of riboflavin, pyridoxal, and cobalamin (metabolic group 2) (i) also had higher RBC levels of homocysteine, (ii) were eating foods containing less vitamin B2, vitamin A, and vitamin B12, (iii) had higher percentage of individuals eating lower amounts of vitamin A assessed by FFQ, and (iv) had higher percentage of individuals with plasma levels below cutoff for b-carotene and riboflavin. The big differences found comparing FFQ and 24 h dietary recall for vitamin B12, vitamin A and folate intakes are expected and explained by lower correlations for vitamin B12 intake between these two instruments (52), and by low to moderate agreement between these two instruments for foods consumed occasionally, such as fruits and dark green vegetables, which are good sources of vitamin A and folate (53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…E, por fim, a classificação de qualidade alimentar por meio dos instrumentos de avaliação, que trouxe a inadequação do consumo alimentar para as populações investigadas, assim como aponta a necessidade de modificação do padrão adotado. Em relação à instrumentalização para avaliação do consumo alimentar, identifica-se uma fragilidade no estudo pela falta de padronização de instrumentos utilizados que permitam a comparabilidade dos resultados, dada a complexidade da investigação do consumo alimentar diversos métodos que têm sido propostos (RODRIGUES et al, 2016).…”
Section: I S C U S S ã Ounclassified