2017
DOI: 10.1590/0101-31572017v37n02a01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxation and distribution of income in Brazil: new evidence from personal income tax data

Abstract: able This paper presents a critical analysis of income and profit taxes in Brazil, arguing that measures adopted in the 1980s and 1990s, as a result of mainstream recommendations, hindered the redistributive role of taxes. An examination of tax data reveals a high degree of top income concentration, low tax progressivity and violations of the principles of horizontal and vertical equity. The main reason for these distortions is the complete tax exemption of dividends, a benefit that is very rarely seen in deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid scientific evidence of the possible consequences, engagement of different actors, and population pressure on constituents are necessary but not sufficient to promote change, given the prevailing neoliberal ideals that support and promote austerity measures, despite widespread and increasing inequality [31, 32]. Although an economic recession is often accompanied by unpopular and controversial decisions, measures implemented so far address neither indirect and regressive taxation [33] nor distorted salary and benefits to some government branches [34]. Austerity measures do not solve these fundamental distortions.…”
Section: Development Environmental Degradation and Disease Spread Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid scientific evidence of the possible consequences, engagement of different actors, and population pressure on constituents are necessary but not sufficient to promote change, given the prevailing neoliberal ideals that support and promote austerity measures, despite widespread and increasing inequality [31, 32]. Although an economic recession is often accompanied by unpopular and controversial decisions, measures implemented so far address neither indirect and regressive taxation [33] nor distorted salary and benefits to some government branches [34]. Austerity measures do not solve these fundamental distortions.…”
Section: Development Environmental Degradation and Disease Spread Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating only the direct monetary fl ows between families and the public sector, thus without considering the impact of indirect taxes, they concluded that (mostly through the public sector workers' earnings and pensions) the Brazilian State contributes heavily to raising the Gini index in the country, being unable to impose direct taxation to counterbalance this effect. In fact, as Gobetti and Orair (2017) noted, the main direct tax in Brazil, the income tax, has a lower progressivity index than those observed in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, and it is well below the average estimated for OECD member countries.…”
Section: Taxes Public Expenditure and Income Distribution: A Revimentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As a result of Piketty's work on wealth and inequality, a new frontier in studying the top echelons of wealth distribution based on tax data has opened in Brazil. Studies such as Gobetti and Orair (2017), Milá (2015), and Souza and Medeiros (2015) fit within this theme. As claimed by these articles, a rigorous analysis of the Brazilian National Accounts has not indicated a breakthrough in labor income at the expense of property income in recent times, but rather, an internal redistributive movement within categories, where remunerations of occupations in the formal segment step further away from the informal segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%