2017
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452017728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Diagnosis in Hybrid Coconut Cultivated in Northeastern Brazil Through Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (Dris)

Abstract: -The assessment of the nutritional status of plants by leaf diagnosis such as the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) has stood out among traditional methods of interpreting the results of plant tissue analysis. For coconut, nutritional monitoring through foliar analysis has been pointed as an efficient method for fertilizer recommendation, and the results have been traditionally interpreted using the critical level of sufficiency ranges criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bras. Frutic., Jaboticabal, 2020, v. 42, n. 2: (e-601) When comparing with the coconut culture, the levels of N, P and Mg are close to what is considered ideal (SALDANHA et al, 2017), taking the fourth leaf as a reference. On the other hand, S and K are below the levels found for coconut, which may be related to high rainfall in the collection period, which causes leaching of nutrients, reducing absorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bras. Frutic., Jaboticabal, 2020, v. 42, n. 2: (e-601) When comparing with the coconut culture, the levels of N, P and Mg are close to what is considered ideal (SALDANHA et al, 2017), taking the fourth leaf as a reference. On the other hand, S and K are below the levels found for coconut, which may be related to high rainfall in the collection period, which causes leaching of nutrients, reducing absorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Higher levels of B, when applied via fertigation, are possibly related to more fractional application and greater availability of water in the summer, due to irrigation, which increases absorption efficiency. Studies in the state of Pará revealed levels of nearly 30 mg kg -1 in leaves of oil palm samples (MATOS et al, 2016) and 15 to 20 mg kg -1 in coconut leaves (SALDANHA et al, 2017) in productive phase. In soils of Kerala, India, the critical variation of B was 7.50 to 13.27 mg kg -1 in the leaves of coconut trees (MATHEW et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1), made it possible to classify 48.3% of the observations as of high yield, indicating that the Cate-Nelson approach used by Khiari et al (2001) was appropriate for this study, as also found by Wairegi and Van Asten (2011) when establishing DRIS and CND standards for banana in the Highlands of East Africa. In other studies, this partitioning method was not always used; instead, the high-yield subpopulation was arbitrarily defined, based only on the expected yield established by the authors (Angeles et al 1993;Saldanha et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same selection based on high ratio of variance was studied by , Santana et al (2008) and Mourão Filho et al (2002). Saldanha et al (2017) reported that relationships among nutrients selected as DRIS standards for coconut showed a high variance ratio (s 2 b /s 2 a ) and reduced CV, which could be very important for production. Therefore, relationships among nutrients that present high s 2 b /s 2 a indicate low variability of data of high productivity group.…”
Section: C1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in diagnosed sample (Serra et al, 2010). Thus, DRIS index of a nutrient consists of mean of deviations of relations of a nutrient with others in relation to their respective optimal values (Saldanha et al, 2017). Each relationship between nutrients in high productivity population is a DRIS standard and has its respective mean and coefficient of variation (Reis Junior and Monerat, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%