Objective: Comparison of complications development rate in various methods for implanting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the surgical treatment of congenital cataract.Methods: The results of surgical treatment of 16 children under 5 years old with bilat‑ eral congenital cataract were assessed. In each case, IOL was implanted according to the technique “optic capture” into one eye (the 1st group of study); the lens was implanted after capsulorrhexis and extraction of anterior segments of vitreous body into the second eye (the 2nd group of study).Results: Fibrinoplastic complications in the postoperative period were more often recorded in the 2nd group than in the 1st one (5 and 1 eyes, respectively). Epithelial proliferation in the 2nd group developed in 10, in the 1st group – in 5 eyes.Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of congenital cataract, implantation of IOLs according to the technique “optic capture” is an effective way of epithelial proliferation and opacity prevention reducing visual acuity in postoperative period. This method is safe regarding inflammatory fibrinoplastic reactions and allows maintaining normal anatomical position of the vitreoretinal structures of the growing eye.
The ophthalmic community does not have specific data on the epidemiology of secondary glaucoma against the background of idiopathic expansion of the episcleral veins, risk factors for the development of this disease. There are no generally accepted guidelines for the management and treatment of such patients. Based on our own observation, this paper presents data on the diagnostic tactics and tactics of treating a patient with secondary glaucoma against the background of idiopathic expansion of the episcleral veins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.