BackgroundThe incidence of cancer pain increases in discharged patients because of discontinued standard treatments and reductions in medication adherence. Motivated by the need for better pain management in discharged patients, we developed a mobile phone app (Pain Guard) to provide continuous treatment information and feedback to discharged cancer patients suffering from pain.ObjectiveThe aim was to design, construct, and test the Pain Guard app in patients managing cancer pain, evaluate the total remission rate of pain and the improvement in quality of life (QoL) to improve pain management for cancer pain patients, and assess patient acceptance of the app.MethodsThis randomized controlled double-arm study involved 58 patients with cancer pain symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving care through the Pain Guard app (n=31) or to a control group (n=27) who received only traditional pharmaceutical care. In a pretest, participants were rated using a baseline cancer pain assessment and QoL evaluation. During treatment, the consumption levels of analgesic drugs were recorded every week. After a 4-week study period, another round of cancer pain assessment and QoL evaluation was conducted. The system’s usability, feasibility, app compliance, and satisfaction were also assessed. Our primary outcome was remission rate of pain, and secondary outcomes were medication adherence, improvements in QoL, frequency of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP), incidence of adverse reactions, and satisfaction of patients.ResultsAll participants (N=58) successfully completed the study. There were no significant differences in baseline pain scores or baseline QoL scores between groups. At the end of the study, the rate of pain remission in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<.001). The frequency of BTcP in the app group was considerably lower than that in the control group (P<.001). The rate of medication adherence in the trial group was considerably higher than that in the control group (P<.001). Improvements in global QoL scores in the trial group were also significantly higher than those in the control group (P<.001). The incidence of adverse reactions in the trial group (7/31) was lower than that in the control group (12/27), especially constipation, with significant differences (P=.01). The 31 participants in the trial group completed a satisfaction survey regarding Pain Guard: 23 (74%) indicated that they were satisfied with receiving pharmaceutical care by Pain Guard, 5 (16%) indicated that they were somewhat satisfied, 2 (6%) indicated neutral feelings, and 1 (3%) indicated that they were somewhat dissatisfied; no participants indicated that they were very dissatisfied.ConclusionsPain Guard was effective for the management of pain in discharged patients with cancer pain, and its operability was effective and easily accepted by patients.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR1800016066; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=27153

Introduction The standard EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol applies DCE data as the primary preference source to model the relative importance of dimensions while cTTO data served to anchor the DCE coefficients onto the QALY scale. This study aims to estimate an EQ-5D-Y-3L value set for China following this protocol, but with a larger cTTO design to better understand the role of cTTO data in estimating EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets. Methods In total, 150 choice sets and 28 EQ-5D-Y-3L health states were valued using DCE and cTTO methods with two independent samples, respectively. General public from 14 different regions were recruited using quota sampling method to achieve representativeness. We compared two modelling strategies: (1) fit the DCE data with mixed logit model with correlated coefficients and a subsequent mapping procedure for anchoring; (2) fit the DCE and TTO data jointly in a hybrid model. Two evaluation criteria (1) coefficient significance and monotonicity; (2) prediction accuracy of the observed cTTO values were used to select the value set. Results In total, 1476 individuals participated in the study, with 1058 participated the DCE interview and 418 participated the cTTO interview. The highest mean TTO value was 0.924 for state 11112 and the lowest mean TTO value was − 0.088 for state 33333. The hybrid model with an A3 term performed the best and was selected as the value set. Discussion Following the international protocol and using a larger cTTO design, this study established the EQ-5D-Y-3L value set using a hybrid model for China. Future EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation study could consider using a larger cTTO design for estimating the value set. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-022-01216-9.

No abstract

Background: Post-esophagectomy airway fistula (PEAF) is a serious complication after esophageal cancer resection. At present, the clinical characteristics, treatments and prognosis of PEAF patients remain inconclusive. We aimed to investigate these problems of patients with PEAF through a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Methods:We included consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in seven major Chinese esophageal cancer centers from January 2010 to December 2020. Based on the anatomic characteristics of PEAF patients, PEAFs were divided into Union type I (without digestive fistula) and Union type II [respiratory-digestive fistula (RDF)], and subtypes a and b (tracheal or bronchial fistulas), as well as L1 and L2 (same or different level of fistulas). The clinical characteristics, diagnoses, managements, and effects of the various types were retrospectively analyzed.Results: PEAF occurred in 85 of 26,608 patients (0.32%), including eight females and 77 males. There were 16 patients with type I and 69 with type II. The numbers of healings, non-healings, and deaths at discharge were 45 (52.9%), 20 (23.5%), and 20 (23.5%), respectively. Type Ib was common in type I, and type II L1 was common in type II. The healing rates of surgical, stent, and conservative treatments were 50%, 60%, and 50%, respectively. All type I patients treated with stent implantation were healed at discharge. The healing rates, mortality, and 3-year survival of type II L1 and type II L2 patients were 55.4% and 30.8%, 17.9% and 30.8%, and 34.3% and 15.4%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates of all PEAFs were 21.1%.Conclusions: PEAF is an infrequent and life-threatening complication after esophagectomy. Patients with different types of PEAF often have different inducements. In this study, we found that the healing rates of surgical and conservative treatments were similar, and stent implantation may have the potential to improve efficacy. Type II L2 patients were the most difficult to cure.