The aim of the study was to examine the potential differences in the assessment of the severity of work-related stress, and in the global assessment of the areas of worklife and individual worklife dimensions in employees working in service occupations. Material and Methods: The research covered 61 emergency workers, 92 helping professionals, and 58 knowledge workers. A subjective assessment of the areas of worklife was carried out using the Areas of Worklife Survey, and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was used to investigate stress severity. Results: The research has revealed statistically significant differences between workers belonging to the 3 groups of service occupations in their assessment of the severity of work-related stress. The findings have shown that 26% of the variance of the Stress Severity Assessment variable is explained by belonging to a specific occupational group. Police officers and helping professionals experience comparably severe stress, which is significantly stronger than that experienced by the laboratory staff. Statistically significant differences have also been found between the studied groups in terms of the global assessment of all areas of worklife, as well as in the assessment of particular areas, i.e., control, rewards, fairness and values. No significant differences have been found with regard to the workload and community areas. Conclusions: Working in social service occupations, whether as emergency or helping professionals, may lead to a similar level of stress severity. The surveyed workers do not differ in their assessment of workload or of the sense of trust, cooperation and support received from their co-workers. Further research should be carried out to explore the sources of stress, which may be linked to other factors than the areas of worklife presented here, such as stress inducing contact with customers, environmental determinants of work, existing hazards to life or health, or the intrinsic predispositions of individuals performing specific types of work and gender.

Wstęp: Artykuł prezentuje wyniki badań nad związkami etyki pracy i przywiązania organizacyjnego z wypaleniem zawodowym, dokonanych na próbie pracowników różnych firm i zawodów: prawników, informatyków, lekarzy, kolejarzy, urzędników oraz nauczycieli (N = 335). Materiał i metody: Badania przeprowadzono zgodnie z modelem Wymagania-zasoby pracy. Etyka pracy została zbadana za pomocą Wielowymiarowego profilu etyki pracy, mierzącego 8 czynników: spostrzeganie pracy jako wartości moralnej, wartościowanie ciężkiej pracy, traktowanie pracy jako centralnego elementu życia, niechęć do marnowania czasu, niechęć do czasu wolnego, odraczanie gratyfikacji, poleganie na sobie oraz gotowość do uczciwego postępowania. Przywiązanie do organizacji zmierzono Skalą przywiązania do organizacji, która obejmuje 3 wymiary: przywiązanie afektywne, normatywne oraz przywiązanie trwania. Wypalenie oceniono za pomocą Kwestionariusza wypalenia zawodowego (polska adaptacja Link Burnout Questionnaire), który mierzy 4 wymiary wypalenia: wyczerpanie psychofizyczne, brak zaangażowania w relacje z klientami, poczucie braku skuteczności zawodowej oraz rozczarowanie. Wyniki: Wyniki badań pokazały, że wymiary etyki pracy oraz przywiązania do organizacji korelują negatywnie z wymiarami wypalenia. Istotnymi predyktorami obniżającymi wypalenie w ramach etyki pracy okazały się: traktowanie pracy jako wartości moralnej, wysokie wartościowanie ciężkiej pracy, traktowanie pracy jako wartości centralnej w życiu, niechęć do czasu wolnego i gotowość do uczciwego postępowania oraz przywiązanie afektywne. Wnioski: Wybrane wymiary etyki pracy i przywiązania do organizacji pełnią rolę zasobów osobistych, obniżających poziom wypalenia zawodowego. Etyka pracy oraz afektywne i normatywne przywiązanie do organizacji zmniejszają rozczarowanie pracą.

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the access of prisoners to healthcare services, as well as the level of satisfaction with the provided services and health assessment among prisoners. Methods: The research was conducted in one of the penitentiary centers in Poland among people jailed between 1 January to 31 January 2020. The response rate of the self-administrated questionnaire was 52.05% (469/901) participants. There were 389 men and 77 women. Results: Prisoners assessed access to health services including GP doctors, specialist doctors, dentists, and hospitals in 3 categories: “bad” ranged: 27.03–67.60%; “medium” ranged: 22.54–53.57%; “good” ranged: 7.02–33.96% depending on the type of arrest, but no statistical significance was demonstrated. Satisfaction with the health services defined as “bad” ranged: 25.00–61.11%; “medium” ranged: 18.97–55.56%; “good” ranged: 5.56–34.62% depending on the type of arrest but no statistical significance was demonstrated. Of 469 prisoners, 215 prisoners (45.84%) declared no addictions. The frequency of addiction does not differ depending on the place/type of punishment served (p = 0.9). In turn, 317 prisoners (68%) declared no chronic diseases. Conclusions: Most of the prisoners described access to health services as “bad”, except female prisoners from a semi-open facility. In turn, satisfaction with healthcare services was most often assessed as “bad”, except for temporarily arrested men and female prisoners from a semi-open facility.

No abstract

The article presents the mutual relations between the components of work ethic and achievement goals: mastery- approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance goals. Work ethic was presented as a syndrome of the following attitudes: 1) perceiving work as a moral value, 2) treating work as a central value in life, and 3) the belief in the importance of hard work that leads to success. This ethic also consists of the following components: 4) unwillingness to waste time, 5) disapproval of spare time (anti-leisure), 6) willingness to delay gratification, 7) willingness to act honestly at work (morality/ethic), and 8) being independent (self-reliance). The research conducted on the sample of 206 employees showed that the dimensions of work ethic are related the most strongly, average and positively to mastery-approach goals but weakly to mastery-avoidance. Performance- approach and performance-avoidance goals correlate positively with only two dimensions: self-reliance and the belief in the importance of hard work. Morality is negatively related to performance goals (approach and avoidance). Being independent (self-reliance) correlates positively but weakly with mastery goals (approach and avoidance). The results show clearly that work ethic is associated with mastery-approach goals. A person who assesses work high, aspires to reach the standard of mastery and it is the motivation that relies mainly on aspiration. Key words: work ethic, achievement motivation, achievement mastery goals, goals