Aim: To assess real-world treatment profiles, including the time to and reasons for discontinuation or drug switching, treatment reinitiation, and postdiscontinuation follow-up in patients receiving antimuscarinics or ß3-agonists for overactive bladder (OAB) through a retrospective chart review. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical charts of 777 patients, aged ≥18 years, who underwent antimuscarinic or ß3-agonist therapy at our hospital. Data on patient's age, sex, chief complaint, and OAB symptom score at therapy initiation were collected. Treatment persistence was assessed with respect to the median time to discontinuation and the persistence rate at 12 months. Results: Older patients, male patients, and those with more severe urgency symptoms were more likely to show treatment persistence with OAB medications. Treatment persistence with mirabegron was significantly longer than that with antimuscarinics when administered as either the first-or second-line medication. Multivariate analyses showed that urgency severity and use of mirabegron were independently associated with better persistence (p = .026 and p = .018, respectively). Out of 583 patients who discontinued medication, 344 continued with the visit schedule, and the reinitiation rate of the OAB medication was 19% at a median follow-up of 24 months. Conclusion: Although the persistence rates for OAB medications improved with the introduction of mirabegron, most patients still discontinued the medication therapy within 1 year. The treatment strategies for patients with mild symptoms and those who are resistant to medication can still be improved. Tailored individualized treatments that avoid excessive reliance on pharmacotherapy would be key to further improve treatment outcomes in OAB patients.

To investigate the impact of the number of cycles and objective response to chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 755 patients from 59 institutions with advanced, chemoresistant urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab. The associations of the overall survival with the number of cycles and best objective response were investigated using Cox multiple regression analysis. Results: Overall, 391 patients received standard first-line chemotherapy and pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment, and were included in the final analysis. Of the 391 patients, 185 received less than four cycles, 134 received four to six cycles and 72 received more than six cycles of first-line chemotherapy. An objective response (complete or partial response) to chemotherapy was observed in 145 patients (37.1%). Univariate analysis showed that the overall survival of patients who received more than six cycles or responded to chemotherapy (complete or partial response) was significantly longer than that of patients who received less than four cycles or did not respond to chemotherapy (stable or progressive disease). At multivariate levels, no correlations were observed between overall survival and the number of cycles of or the response to chemotherapy. Conclusions: Therapeutic benefit of pembrolizumab can be expected irrespective of the objective response to and number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

BackgroundThe benefits of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and impaired performance status (PS) remain unknown. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with platinum‐refractory UC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥2 to identify which subgroups may benefit from this drug.MethodsThis retrospective nationwide cohort study collected clinicopathological information for 755 patients from 59 institutions. The overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were compared among the patients with PS 0–1, 2, and 3–4. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors predicting OS in patients with PS ≥2.ResultsThe numbers of patients with PS 0–1, 2, and 3–4 were 602, 98, and 55, respectively; the ORRs in these groups were 29.5, 15.3, and 9.1%, respectively, and the median OS times were 14.3, 3.1, and 2.4 months, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, a neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3.5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.897) and liver metastasis (HR = 2.072) were associated with OS in the PS ≥2 subgroup. The median OS of patients with PS ≥2 without either risk factor was 6.8 months, compared with 3.1 months for patients with one risk factor and 2.3 months for patients with both risk factors.ConclusionsPS ≥2 portended worse ORR and OS than PS ≤1 despite a comparable safety profile. Among the patients with impaired PS, patients with NLR <3.5 and no liver metastasis may most greatly benefit from pembrolizumab therapy.

Abbreviations & Acronyms 3D-CRT = three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy A-ADT = adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy ADT = androgen deprivation therapy ARAT = androgen receptor axistargeted BF = biochemical failure CAB = combined androgen blockade CF = clinical failure CI = confidence interval CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer CT = computed tomography EBRT = external beam radiation therapy IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy iPSA = pretreatment prostatespecific antigen LH-RH = luteinizing hormonereleasing hormone analog MDT = metastasis-directed therapy MRI = magnetic resonance imaging NA-ADT = neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy OMPCa = oligometastatic prostate cancer OS = overall survival PCSS = prostate cancer-specific survival PSA = prostate-specific antigen PTT = prostate-targeted treatment WPRT = whole pelvic radiation therapy