2021
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembrolizumab for treating advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients with impaired performance status: Analysis of a Japanese nationwide cohort

Abstract: BackgroundThe benefits of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and impaired performance status (PS) remain unknown. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with platinum‐refractory UC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥2 to identify which subgroups may benefit from this drug.MethodsThis retrospective nationwide cohort study collected clinicopathological information for 755 patients from 59 institutions. The overall response rate (ORR) and ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the real‐world practice and treatment of older patients or those with impaired PS, pembrolizumab treatment showed comparable oncological outcomes and safety profiles in older patients 5 and in a subset of patients with poor PS 6 . Real‐world data regarding the outcome of EV treatment in patients who are ineligible for clinical trials will be warranted in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the real‐world practice and treatment of older patients or those with impaired PS, pembrolizumab treatment showed comparable oncological outcomes and safety profiles in older patients 5 and in a subset of patients with poor PS 6 . Real‐world data regarding the outcome of EV treatment in patients who are ineligible for clinical trials will be warranted in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After stratifying patients on the basis of the occurrence of clinically significant irAEs, 198 patients were extracted from each group by PSM and included in further analyses. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups (Table 1 7 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], p = 0.773). Multivariate analysis illustrated that the presence of grade ≥2 irAEs was associated with significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.31-0.73, p < 0.001) and a trend toward favorable OS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.48-1.03, p = 0.070; Figure S1).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Clinically Significant Iraes and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the number of responders to ICIs is limited, and biomarkers for predicting ICI efficacy are lacking. In addition to oncological features such as a microsatellite instability–high status and programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, clinical features including the performance status (PS) and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were previously studied as biomarkers 8–10 . Recently, an association between the onset of irAEs and the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs was suggested in melanoma and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) 11–13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 5 , 6 Systemic chemotherapy and ICIs are two immunoregulation agents frequently administered to patients with advanced UC. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 Treatment with ICIs in combination or ICIs plus TKIs is considered the standard of care for patients with metastatic RCC. 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Furthermore, immune‐related AEs are closely associated with high‐dose steroid administration in patients treated with ICIs, and steroid use has been associated with impaired humoral response to SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA vaccines in patients with cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the seropositivity rate in patients with solid tumors was reported as slightly lower (approximately 90%) than in healthy controls 4–6 . Systemic chemotherapy and ICIs are two immunoregulation agents frequently administered to patients with advanced UC 7–12 . Treatment with ICIs in combination or ICIs plus TKIs is considered the standard of care for patients with metastatic RCC 13–18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%