Aims
Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes for hospitalization and mortality. After first admission with acute decompensated HF, some patients are in high risk for short‐term and long‐term mortality. These patients should be identified, closely followed up, and treated. It has been observed that blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on admission is a predictive marker for short‐term mortality. Recently, it has been shown that higher BUN levels on discharge are also a bad prognostic predictor. However, the prognostic value of BUN alteration during hospital stay was not investigated; therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of BUN variation during hospitalization on mortality.
Methods and results
A retrospective study included patients with first hospitalization with the primary diagnosis of HF. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of the values of BUN on admission and discharge, respectively: normal‐normal, elevated‐normal, normal‐elevated, and elevated‐elevated. Four thousand seven hundred sixty‐eight patients were included; 2567 were male (53.8%); the mean age was 74.7 ± 12.7 years. The 90 day mortality rate in the normal‐normal group was 7% lower than that in the elevated‐normal (14.6%) and normal‐elevated (19.3%) groups; P value < 0.01. The 90 day mortality in the elevated‐elevated group (28.8%) was significantly higher than that in the other groups; P < 0.001. During the 36 month follow‐up, these results are maintained. While sub‐dividing BUN levels into <30, 30–39, and >40 mg/dL, higher BUN levels correlated with higher 90 day mortality rate regardless of creatinine levels, brain natriuretic peptide, or age. Moreover, BUN on admission and on discharge correlated better with mortality than did creatinine and glomerular filtration rate at the same points.
Conclusions
The BUN both on admission and on discharge is a prognostic predictor in patients with HF; however, patients with elevated levels both on admission and on discharge have the worst prognosis. Moreover, worsening or lack of improvement in BUN during hospitalization is a worse prognostic predictor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first trial to discuss the BUN change during hospitalization in HF.
We hypothesized that targeted NGS sequencing might have an advantage over Sanger sequencing, especially in polymicrobial infections. The study included 55 specimens from 51 patients. We compared targeted NGS to Sanger sequencing in clinical samples submitted for Sanger sequencing. The overall concordance rate was 58% (32/55) for NGS vs. Sanger. NGS identified 9 polymicrobial and 2 monomicrobial infections among 19 Sanger-negative samples and 8 polymicrobial infections in 11 samples where a 16S gene was identified by gel electrophoresis, but could not be mapped to an identified pathogen by Sanger. We estimated that NGS could have contributed to patient management in 6/18 evaluated patients and thus has an advantage over Sanger sequencing in certain polymicrobial infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.