Patch testing for drugs causing ADRs shows high specificity rates even though the sensitivity is low. Such tests may therefore be useful in supporting the diagnosis of delayed-type CADRs, particularly when antibiotics or anticonvulsants are involved and the cutaneous reaction is a morbilliform rash.
Leg SSIs following coronary artery bypass surgery are common and associated with morbidity. We suggest reconsidering open saphenous vein harvesting in obese female patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the concordance between epidemiologically determined transmission and genetic linkage of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp). Methods: We included consecutive KPC-Kp carriers between December 2016 and April 2017 in a hospital endemic for KPC-Kp. We assessed epidemiological relatedness between patients by prospective investigations by the infection control team. The probability of epidemiological relatedness was classified into four groups: no suspected transmission, low, moderate and high probability of transmission. Wholegenome sequencing of isolates was performed. Genetic linkage between KPC-Kp isolates was expressed by distance between isolates in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We established an SNP cut-off defining a different strain based on the reconstructed phylogenetic tree. We compared the epidemiological and genetic linkage of all isolates from all patients. Results: The study included 25 KPC-Kp carriers with 49 isolates. SNP variance was available for 1129 crossed patient-isolate pairs. Genomic linkage, based on a cut-off of 80 SNPs to define related isolates, was found in 115/708 (16.2%) of isolates with no transmission suspected epidemiologically, 27/319 (8.5%) of low, 11/26 (42.3%) of moderate and 64/76 (84.2%) of high epidemiological transmission risk determination (p < 0.001 for trend). Similar results and significant trends were shown on sensitivity analyses using a lower SNP cut-off (six SNPs) and patient-isolate unique pairs, analysing the first isolate from each patient. Conclusions: While significant concordance between epidemiological and genomic transmission patterns was found, epidemiological investigations of transmission are limited by the possibility of unidentified transmissions or over-estimation of associations. Genetic linkage analysis is an important aid to epidemiological transmission assessment.
Objectives: To assess the effects and safety of β-blockers in hospitalized patients with burns. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. A broad search was conducted to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing β-blockers to control in hospitalized patients with burns. The primary outcome was 3-month all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical patient-relevant end points. We subgrouped results by children/adults and burn severity. Risk of bias was assessed using the individual domain approach. Results: Four RCTs reported in 11 publications were included. Primary outcome of mortality was assessed in children (2 trials, n = 424) and adults (2 trials, n = 148) with severe burns. No significant difference was found between propranolol and control for mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.48-1.39, 4 trials with broad confidence intervals in adults and children), sepsis (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46-1.43, 2 trials), and survivors’ length of stay (absolute mean difference = 2.53, 95% CI = −2.58–7.63, 3 trials). There was no significant difference in bradycardia (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.77-2.3, 2 trials), hypotension (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.73-2.17, 3 trials), or cardiac arrhythmia (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.12-71.87, 1 trial). The evidence was graded as very low certainty, due to trial’s internal risk of bias, imprecision, and possible selective reporting. Conclusions: No sufficient evidence was found to support or refute an advantage for β-blocker use in children or adults after burns. Additional studies are needed to create a consensus and formulate practice guidelines on the optimal β-blocker to use, indications for initiation, and duration of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.