Patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), particularly if recently treated with anti-CD20 antibodies, are at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Because studies evaluating humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine in these patients are lacking, recommendations regarding vaccination strategy remain unclear. The humoral immune response to BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients with B-NHL who received 2 vaccine doses 21 days apart and compared with the response in healthy controls. Antibody titer, measured by the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2S assay, was evaluated 2 to 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients with B-NHL (n = 149), aggressive B-NHL (a-B-NHL; 47%), or indolent B-NHL (i-B-NHL; 53%) were evaluated. Twenty-eight (19%) were treatment naïve, 37% were actively treated with a rituximab/obinutuzumab (R/Obi)–based induction regimen or R/Obi maintenance, and 44% had last been treated with R/Obi >6 months before vaccination. A seropositive response was achieved in 89%, 7.3%, and 66.7%, respectively, with response rates of 49% in patients with B-NHL vs 98.5% in 65 healthy controls (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer time since exposure to R/Obi and absolute lymphocyte count ≥0.9 × 103/μL predicted a positive serological response. Median time to achieve positive serology among anti-CD20 antibody-treated patients was longer in i-B-NHL vs a-B-NHL. The humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is impaired in patients with B-NHL who are undergoing R/Obi treatment. Longer time since exposure to R/Obi is associated with improved response rates to the COVID-19 vaccine. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04746092.
These data suggest that PET/CT is a useful tool for both, initial staging and follow-up after therapy in patients with MALT lymphoma. Its sensitivity depends on disease location and stage at initial diagnosis.
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have an impaired antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Here, we evaluated the antibody response to a third BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who failed to achieve a humoral response after standard two-dose vaccination regimen. Anti-SARS-CoV-2S and neutralizing antibodies were measured 3 weeks after administration of the third dose. In 172 patients with CLL the antibody response rate was 23.8%. Response rate among actively treated patients (12.0%, n=12/100) was lower compared to treatment-naïve patients (40.0%, n=16/40; OR=4.9, 95% CI 1.9-12.9; p<0.001) and patients off-therapy (40.6%, n=13/32; OR=5.0, 95% CI 1.8-14.1; p<0.001), (p<0.001). In those actively treated with BTK inhibitors or venetoclax ± anti-CD20 antibody, response rates were extremely low (15.3%, n=9/59 and 7.7%, n=3/39, respectively). Only one of the 28 patients (3.6%) treated with anti-CD20 antibodies <12 months prior to vaccination responded. The anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody levels correlated linearly with neutralizing antibody titers (r=0.732, p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the independent variables that were associated with response included lack of active therapy (OR=5.6, 95% CI 2.3-13.8; p<0.001) and serum IgA levels ≥80 mg/dL (OR=5.8, 95% CI 2.1-15.9; p<0.001) In conclusion, in patients with CLL/SLL who failed to achieve a humoral response after standard two-dose BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination regimen, close to a quarter responded to the third dose of vaccine. The antibody response rates were lower during active treatment and in patients with a recent exposure (<12 months prior to vaccination) to anti-CD20 therapy.
Thrombotic events are an increasingly recognized complication of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). We aimed to define clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcome for venous thrombosis as opposed to arterial thrombosis following administration of IVIg. Six patients with post-IVIg venous thrombosis were identified at our institution. In addition, a review of the literature revealed 65 reported cases. Arterial thrombosis (stroke and myocardial infarction) was four times more common than venous thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The incidence rate was estimated at 0.15-1.2% per treatment course, but the large increase in reported cases in 2003 suggests that the true incidence may be significantly greater. The following differences were found between arterial and venous events: arterial thrombosis occurred early after IVIg administration (49% within 4 h, 77% within 24 h) and was associated with advanced age and atherosclerotic vascular disease; venous thrombosis occurred later (54% more than 24 h after IVIg administration) and was associated with factors contributing to venous stasis (obesity and immobility). Thirteen patients died (mortality 20%), 11 of whom had arterial thrombosis. In conclusion, IVIg-associated thrombosis is more common than previously recognized, and is associated with significant mortality. The different characteristics of arterial and venous events may reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms should aid in defining a risk-benefit ratio for the individual patient.
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) represent an exciting inhibitory modality with many advantages, including substoichiometric degradation of targets. Their scope, though, is still limited to date by the requirement for a sufficiently potent target binder. A solution that proved useful in tackling challenging targets is the use of electrophiles to allow irreversible binding to the target. However, such binding will negate the catalytic nature of PROTACs. Reversible covalent PROTACs potentially offer the best of both worlds. They possess the potency and selectivity associated with the formation of the covalent bond, while being able to dissociate and regenerate once the protein target is degraded. Using Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) as a clinically relevant model system, we show efficient degradation by noncovalent, irreversible covalent, and reversible covalent PROTACs, with <10 nM DC 50 's and >85% degradation. Our data suggest that part of the degradation by our irreversible covalent PROTACs is driven by reversible binding prior to covalent bond formation, while the reversible covalent PROTACs drive degradation primarily by covalent engagement. The PROTACs showed enhanced inhibition of B cell activation compared to ibrutinib and exhibit potent degradation of BTK in patient-derived primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. The most potent reversible covalent PROTAC, RC-3, exhibited enhanced selectivity toward BTK compared to noncovalent and irreversible covalent PROTACs. These compounds may pave the way for the design of covalent PROTACs for a wide variety of challenging targets.
Obesity is recognized as a possible cause for reactive leukocytosis. Awareness of this 'obesity-associated leukocytosis' may help the clinician to avoid more extensive and unnecessary diagnostic work-up, particularly in similar obese subjects.
CD74 is a cell-surface receptor for the cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor binding to CD74 induces its intramembrane cleavage and the release of its cytosolic intracellular domain (CD74-ICD), which regulates cell survival. In the present study, we characterized the transcriptional activity of CD74-ICD in chronic lymphocytic B cells. We show that following CD74 activation, CD74-ICD interacts with the transcription factors RUNX (Runt related transcription factor) and NF-κB and binds to proximal and distal regulatory sites enriched for genes involved in apoptosis, immune response, and cell migration. This process leads to regulation of expression of these genes. Our results suggest that identifying targets of CD74 will help in understanding of essential pathways regulating B-cell survival in health and disease.CD74 | transcription | CLL | NF-κB | RUNX
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.