The study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary NFC/NDF ratio change on rumen bacteria in sheep. Twelve Karakul sheep were assigned randomly into four groups fed with four dietary NFC/NDF ratios of 0.54, 0.96, 1.37, and 1.90 and they were assigned into groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The experiment was divided into four periods: I (1–18 d), II (19–36 d), III (37–54 d), and IV (55–72 d). In each period, the first 15 d were used for adaption, and then rumen fluid was collected for 3 d from each sheep before morning feeding. The fluid was analyzed with three generations of full-length amplifiers sequencing. Results showed that the bacterial diversity of group 4 was decreased in period III and IV. At the phylum level, Bacteroidetes (37–60%) and Firmicutes (26–51%) were the most dominant bacteria over the four periods. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Tenericutes, and Spirochaete changed with dietary NFC/NDF ratio change over the four periods, but there was no difference among groups over the four periods (p > 0.05). At the genus level, unidentified-Lachnospiraceae was the dominant genus, and its relative abundance in group 3 was high during the period I and III (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Mycoplasma in group 4 was high in the period I and II (p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Succiniclasticum was high in group 2 of period II (p < 0.05). At the species level, the relative abundance of Butyrivibrio-fibrisolvens was found to be high in group 3 during periods I and III (p < 0.05). The main semi-cellulose-degrading bacteria and starch-degrading bacteria were low, and there was no significant difference among groups over four periods (p > 0.05). Taken together, the dietary NFC/NDF ratio of 1.90 decreased the diversity of bacteria as a period changed from I to IV. While the main phylum bacteria didn’t change, their relative abundance changed with the dietary NFC/NDF ratio change over the four periods. The most prevalent genus was unidentified-Lachnospiraceae, and its relative abundance was higher in dietary NFC/NDF ratio of 1.37 than other groups. Similarly, the main cellulose-degrading species was higher in the treatment of dietary NFC/NDF ratio of 1.37 than other groups.
27An study was was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary(non fibrous carbohydrate) 28 NFC/(neutral detergent fiber)NDF on ruminal bacteria in Karakul sheep. Twelve Karakul sheep 29 were assigned randomly to four dietary treatments of NFC/NDF (0.78, 1.23, 1.61 and 2.00 30 respectively) as group 1, 2, 3 to 4. The experiment lasted for four periods, period I (1~18 d), II 31 (19~36 d), III (37~54 d) and IV (55~72 d). Ruminal digesta were collected consecutively for three 32 days to measure pH and bacteria per period. The results indicated that the average ruminal pH and 33 amounts of OTUs were decreased with the increase of dietary NFC/NDF for four periods. At 34 phylum level, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the predominant bacteria of four periods, 35 Bacteroidetes were decreased, while the relative abundance of Firmicutes was increased with 36 dietary NFC/NDF for four periods, but the difference wasn't significant (P>0.05). At genus level, 37 the most relative abundance genus was unidentified-Lachnospiraceae which reached the highest in 38 group 3 for four periods, but the difference wasn't significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: ruminal pH 39 and bacteria were decreased with the increase of dietary NFC/NDF and the most dominant 40 bacteria were not change with dietary NFC/NDF and periods in Karakul sheep. 41
CH 4 produced by ruminants aggravates the greenhouse effect and cause wastage of feed energy, and CH 4 emissions are related to methanogens. According to the current literature, there is a symbiotic relationship between methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria, so reducing methane will inevitably affect the degradation of fiber materials.
A long-term of high concentration feeding in ruminants can bring huge economic profits, but it also impose ruminants into great threat of suffering subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA). SARA is a kind of disease which attenuate the health, feed intake and production of ruminants, and when ruminants suffer SARA, the concentration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increase largely. Glycyrrhizin is reported to have anti-inflammation effects, and the study was conducted to investigate effects of glycyrrhizin on LPS-induced goat ruminal epithelial cells (GRECs) to provide evidence for using glycyrrhizin as a treatment for SARA. Effects of LPS, and glycyrrhizin on cell viability of GRECs were investigated, respectively. Then GRECs were stimulated with LPS (50 mg/L) for 2 h, and glycyrrhizin were added at the concentration of 0, 50, 75, 100 and 125 mg/L for 24 h to investigate the expression of inflammatory cytokines (by Elisa kits), the mRNA expression of NF-κB and inflammatory cytokines (by qRT-PCR), the distribution of Zo-1 and Occludin (by immunofluorescence staining), the expression of Occludin (by Western blot analysis), and the morphology of GRECs. The results showed that: (1) Glycyrrhizin at the concentration of 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/L had no cytotoxic effects on GRECs, and LPS at the concentration of 50 mg/L significantly decreased the cell viability of GRECs. (2) Glycyrrhizin attenuated the expression and relative mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12 by a dose-dependent manner, and significantly attenuated the relative mRNA expression of NF-κB. (3) Immunofluorescence staining and Western blot analysis showed that the quantity of Zo-1 and Occludin, and the expression of Occludin all increased with the treatment of glycyrrhizin. (4) Glycyrrhizin attenuated LPS-induced autophagy and protected the structural integrity of GRECs. In conclusion, glycyrrhizin significantly inhibited the inflammatory response in LPS-stimulated GRECs, and it may be used as a potential agent for the treatment of SARA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.