Scope: Decreasing β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation is of significance in finding therapeutic candidates for cognitive impairments in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this study is to investigate the potency of the active components of walnut protein in decreasing Aβ aggregation and ameliorating cognitive impairments. Methods and results: Cell model of intracellular Aβ42 aggregation is used to explore the active ingredients in walnut protein hydrolysate (WPH). A bioactive peptide (Pro-Pro-Lys-Asn-Trp, PW5) with great anti-Aβ42 aggregation activity identified from the WPH is synthesized for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Using classic APP/PS1 mouse model, it is validated that PW5 exerts its effects on cognitive improvement through reducing Aβ plaques accumulation. Moreover, metabolomic analysis reveals that serum norepinephrine (NE) and isovalerate levels are significantly increased in response to PW5 intervention, with decreased serum levels of acetylcholine (AChe) and valerate, compared with the vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice. PW5 feeding also improves gut dysbiosis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice by increasing the relative abundance of Firmicutes and decreasing Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia as displayed by 16s rRNA analyses. Conclusions: These promising results support the utilization of peptide PW5 as an active ingredient in functional foods or potential drug candidate for the prevention and/or treatment of AD.

BackgroundEnhancing circulating adiponectin is considered as a potential approach for the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were reported to increase adiponectin by previous studies using a mixture of them. However, their individual effects on adiponectin and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. In the present study, we observed and compared the individual effect of DHA and EPA on adiponectin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and further tested whether DHA or EPA regulated adiponectin by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and its phosphorylation at Ser273 to provide a plausible explanation for their distinct actions.MethodsFirstly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with different doses of DHA or EPA for 24 h. Secondly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with DHA or EPA in the presence or absence of GW9662. Thirdly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were pretreated with DHA or EPA for 24 h, followed by being respectively co-incubated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or roscovitine for another 2 h. Bovine serum albumin treatment served as the control. After treatments, cellular and secreted adiponectin, cellular PPARγ and its phosphorylation at Ser273 were determined.ResultsCompared with the control, DHA increased cellular and secreted adiponectin at 50 and 100 μmol/L, while EPA increased them at 100 and 200 μmol/L. Adiponectin expressions in DHA treated groups were significantly higher than those in EPA treated groups at 50 and 100 μmol/L. Both DHA and EPA enhanced PPARγ expression, but DHA was more effective. GW9662 blocked DHA- and EPA-induced increases in PPARγ as well as adiponectin. Remarkably, an opposite regulation of PPARγ phosphorylation was detected after fatty acids treatment: DHA inhibited it but EPA stimulated it. TNF-α blocked DHA-induced decrease in PPARγ phosphorylation, which eventually led to a decrease in adiponectin. Roscovitine blocked EPA-induced increase in PPARγ phosphorylation, but the corresponding increase in adiponectin was non-significant.ConclusionDHA compared with EPA led to a greater increase in cellular and secreted adiponectin at relative low concentrations by increasing PPARγ expression and inhibiting its phosphorylation at Ser273. DHA may be more beneficial than EPA in reducing risks of NCDs.

Higher dairy fat exposure is not associated with an increased risk of CVD.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract