We propose a new design of complex self-evolving structures that vary over time due to environmental interaction. In conventional 3D printing systems, materials are meant to be stable rather than active and fabricated models are designed and printed as static objects. Here, we introduce a novel approach for simulating and fabricating self-evolving structures that transform into a predetermined shape, changing property and function after fabrication. The new locally coordinated bending primitives combine into a single system, allowing for a global deformation which can stretch, fold and bend given environmental stimulus.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The precise border of somites formed during mouse somitogenesis is defined by a Tbx6 expression domain, which is established by Mesp2-mediated Tbx6 suppression in the anterior part of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). Ripply2, a target of Mesp2, is proposed to be involved in this down-regulation because Ripply2 deficiency causes an anterior expansion of the Tbx6 domain, resembling the Mesp2-null phenotype. However, it is unclear whether Ripply2 acts on Tbx6 independently or in association with Mesp2. To address this question, we generated three sets of transgenic mice with the following Ripply2 expression patterns: (1) overexpression in the endogenous expression domain, (2) expression instead of Mesp2 (Ripply2-knockin), and (3) ectopic expression in the entire PSM. We found accelerated Tbx6 degradation in the embryos showing Ripply2 overexpression. In the Ripply2-knockin embryos, the anterior limit of Tbx6 domain was generated by Ripply2 even in the absence of Mesp2. Ectopic Ripply2 expression along the entire PSM suppressed Tbx6 and induced Sox2-positive neural tube formation at the bilateral domain, resembling the Tbx6-null phenotype. This phenotype resulted from Tbx6 protein and not mRNA elimination, suggesting the post-translational down-regulation of Tbx6 by Ripply2. Taken together, our results demonstrate that Ripply2 represses Tbx6 in a Mesp2-independent manner, which contributes to the accurate segmental border formation.

The liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass is studied for the production of liquid (transportation) fuels. The process concept uses a product recycle as a liquefaction medium and produces a bio-oil that can be co-processed in a conventional oil refinery. This all is done at medium temperature (≈ 300 °C) and pressure (≈ 60 bar). Solvent-screening experiments showed that oxygenated solvents are preferred as they allow high oil (up to 93% on carbon basis) and low solid yields (≈ 1-2% on carbon basis) and thereby outperform the liquefaction of biomass in compressed water and biomass pyrolysis. The following solvent ranking was obtained: guaiacol>hexanoic acid ≫ n-undecane. The use of wet biomass results in higher oil yields than dry biomass. However, it also results in a higher operating pressure, which would make the process more expensive. Refill experiments were also performed to evaluate the possibility to recycle the oil as the liquefaction medium. The recycled oil appeared to be very effective to liquefy the biomass and even surpassed the start-up solvent guaiacol, but became increasingly heavy and more viscous after each refill and eventually showed a molecular weight distribution that resembles that of refinery vacuum residue.