Ultrasonography may underestimate the extent of tendon damage in tendons with long-term injury. Low-field MRI provided a more sensitive technique for evaluation of tendon injury and should be considered in horses with tendinitis of > 4 weeks' duration.

Objective To compare the results of the measurement of femoral torsion using the axial measurement method on three‐dimensional (3D) volumetric reconstructions of computed tomography images AMM(CT), the biplanar measurement method on 3D volumetric reconstructions of computed tomography images BMM(CT) and a reference standard using the axial measurement method on stereolithographic bone models AMM (SBM). Study design Ex vivo study. Sample populations Three‐dimensional volumetric reconstructions of computed tomography images and stereolithographic bone models from 23 femurs of 14 dogs with hind limb lameness presented for orthopedic evaluation. Methods Three‐dimensional volumetric reconstructions of computed tomography images and stereolithographic bone models of each femur were created from computed tomography data. Femoral torsion was measured using the AMM (CT) and the BMM (CT) and compared with a reference standard, the AMM (SBM). Results No differences were noted among the measurement methods (P = .0863). Median measurement of femoral torsion using the AMM (CT) was 34.2°, the BMM (CT) was 36.7°, and the AMM (SBM) was 32.3°. Conclusion No differences existed among the AMM (CT), the BMM (CT), and the AMM (SBM). Clinical significance Both AMM (CT) and BMM (CT) can be used to measure femoral torsion in dogs with orthopedic disease.

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare measurements of angle of lateral opening (ALO) and version determined using a radioopaque cup position assessment device imaged with fluoroscopy to measurements obtained by CT and direct measurement in a cadaveric model. Our null hypothesis was that there would not be any difference in the angles measured by the techniques. Methods Six cadavers were implanted with BFX acetabular components. The CPAD was placed and images were obtained with fluoroscopy. Measurements were obtained from the radiopaque marker bars on the CPAD device, and version and ALO were calculated. The ALO and version were determined by CT and DM. Comparisons were made using a two-way analysis of variance and a generalized linear model procedure analysis. Results There were no significant differences between the measurements for ALO (p = 0.275) or version (p = 0.226). Correlation between methods was 0.948 and 0.951 for ALO and version, respectively. The mean difference (standard deviation [SD], and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for ALO were: CT versus CPAD 1.85 degrees (± 2.32 degrees [-2.99–3.31]), CT versus DM 1.96 degrees (± 1.99 degrees [−2.2–4.27]), CPAD versus DM1.74 degrees (±2.21 degrees [−1.13 and 5.24]). The mean difference (SD [CI]) for version was CT versus CPAD 2.86 degrees (±1.56 degrees [ −2.63–1.69]), CT versus DM 1.10 degrees (±1.42 degrees [−1.57–2.09]), CPAD versus DM 1.07 degrees (±0.76 degrees [0.13–2.09]). Clinical Relevance The results demonstrate that intraoperative imaging in cadaveric specimens with the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO and version of the acetabular component.

The distolateral instrument portal described may be a useful alternative to a proximolateral portal when distal carpal sheath instrument access is necessary or advantageous.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate a fluoroscopic method of angle of lateral opening (ALO) categorization based on identification of the visible portion of a pre-existing, circular recess within the metal shell of the BioMedtrix BFX acetabular component, which projects as an ellipse at clinically relevant ALO values. Our hypothesis was that there will be an association between the actual ALO and the categorization of ALO based on identification of the visible portion of the elliptical recess on a lateral fluoroscopic image at clinically relevant values. Methods A custom plexiglass jig was fitted with a two-axis inclinometer and a 24 mm BFX acetabular component attached to its tabletop. Fluoroscopic reference images were obtained with the cup positioned at an ALO of 35, 45 and 55 degrees with a fixed 10 degrees of retroversion. Thirty study fluoroscopic images (10 images at each ALO) were obtained based on randomization at an ALO of 35, 45 and 55 degrees (±0.5 degrees) with 10 degrees of retroversion. The order of the study images was randomized, and a single, blinded observer categorized the 30 study images as representing an ALO of 35, 45 or 55 degrees by comparison to the reference images. Results Analysis showed perfect (30/30) agreement with a weighted kappa coefficient of 1 (95% confidence interval: −0.717 to 1). Clinical Relevance The results demonstrate that accurate categorization of ALO can be achieved using this fluoroscopic method. This method may prove to be a simple but effective method of estimating intraoperative ALO.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract