Renal transplantation is a successful treatment for terminal renal failure in cats. However, in the initial clinical study, there was a frequent occurrence of obstruction of the implanted ureter at the bladder wall or stoma. This resulted in the use of a modified "drop-in" technique that had proved effective in the prevention of obstruction in five normal cats. When applied to renal transplant recipients, ureteral obstruction was reduced, but continued to occur. The modified "drop-in" technique was abandoned and replaced with a technique that apposed the cut edge of the ureteral mucosa to the torn edge of the bladder mucosa. This technique is recommended as it has prevented ureteral obstruction in six successive cases. Prevention of ureteral obstruction, and the required corrective surgery, markedly reduces patient morbidity and mortality, length of hospitalization, and expense to the client.
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare measurements of angle of lateral opening (ALO) and version determined using a radioopaque cup position assessment device imaged with fluoroscopy to measurements obtained by CT and direct measurement in a cadaveric model. Our null hypothesis was that there would not be any difference in the angles measured by the techniques.
Methods Six cadavers were implanted with BFX acetabular components. The CPAD was placed and images were obtained with fluoroscopy. Measurements were obtained from the radiopaque marker bars on the CPAD device, and version and ALO were calculated. The ALO and version were determined by CT and DM. Comparisons were made using a two-way analysis of variance and a generalized linear model procedure analysis.
Results There were no significant differences between the measurements for ALO (p = 0.275) or version (p = 0.226). Correlation between methods was 0.948 and 0.951 for ALO and version, respectively. The mean difference (standard deviation [SD], and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for ALO were: CT versus CPAD 1.85 degrees (± 2.32 degrees [-2.99–3.31]), CT versus DM 1.96 degrees (± 1.99 degrees [−2.2–4.27]), CPAD versus DM1.74 degrees (±2.21 degrees [−1.13 and 5.24]). The mean difference (SD [CI]) for version was CT versus CPAD 2.86 degrees (±1.56 degrees [ −2.63–1.69]), CT versus DM 1.10 degrees (±1.42 degrees [−1.57–2.09]), CPAD versus DM 1.07 degrees (±0.76 degrees [0.13–2.09]).
Clinical Relevance The results demonstrate that intraoperative imaging in cadaveric specimens with the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO and version of the acetabular component.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate a fluoroscopic method of angle of lateral opening (ALO) categorization based on identification of the visible portion of a pre-existing, circular recess within the metal shell of the BioMedtrix BFX acetabular component, which projects as an ellipse at clinically relevant ALO values. Our hypothesis was that there will be an association between the actual ALO and the categorization of ALO based on identification of the visible portion of the elliptical recess on a lateral fluoroscopic image at clinically relevant values.
Methods A custom plexiglass jig was fitted with a two-axis inclinometer and a 24 mm BFX acetabular component attached to its tabletop. Fluoroscopic reference images were obtained with the cup positioned at an ALO of 35, 45 and 55 degrees with a fixed 10 degrees of retroversion. Thirty study fluoroscopic images (10 images at each ALO) were obtained based on randomization at an ALO of 35, 45 and 55 degrees (±0.5 degrees) with 10 degrees of retroversion. The order of the study images was randomized, and a single, blinded observer categorized the 30 study images as representing an ALO of 35, 45 or 55 degrees by comparison to the reference images.
Results Analysis showed perfect (30/30) agreement with a weighted kappa coefficient of 1 (95% confidence interval: −0.717 to 1).
Clinical Relevance The results demonstrate that accurate categorization of ALO can be achieved using this fluoroscopic method. This method may prove to be a simple but effective method of estimating intraoperative ALO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.