The objective was to evaluate the effects of feeding ground canola seed on the fatty acid profile, yield, and composition of milk from dairy cows. Twenty-four multiparous Holstein cows (548.3 +/- 11.9 kg body weight and 28 +/- 9 d in lactation) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: Control (CON) or ground canola seed treatment (GCS) with 14% [of diet dry matter (DM)] of the total ration as ground canola seed containing 34% lipid. Diets contained 20% crude protein, but varied in net energy as a result of fat content differences of 2.5% and 6.4% (DM) for CON and GCS, respectively. Diets were composed of corn, corn silage, alfalfa (50:50 ground hay and haylage, DM basis), soybean and blood meal, and vitamins and minerals. Mechanically extruded canola meal was used in the CON diet to adjust for the protein from canola seed in the GCS diet. Cows were housed in tie-stalls and fed and milked twice daily for 10 wk. The inclusion of ground canola seed did not alter DM intake, weight gain, or body condition score of cows. Milk fat from GCS cows had greater proportions of long-chain fatty acids (> or = 18 carbons) and a lower ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids. Feeding GCS reduced the proportion of short- and medium-chain fatty acids. Milk fat from cows fed GCS had a greater proportion of vaccenic acid and tended to have a higher proportion of cis-9,trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid. Actual and 3.5% fat-corrected milk yields were similar between treatments. The milk fat and protein percentages were lower for GCS cows, but total yield of these components was similar between treatments. Milk urea nitrogen was lower and serum urea nitrogen tended to be lower in cows fed canola seed. Serum glucose, insulin, and nonesterified fatty acids were not altered, but serum triglycerides were higher in GCS cows. Ammonia and total volatile fatty acids tended to be lower in ruminal fluid from GCS cows; rumen pH was unchanged. Feeding canola seed to lactating dairy cows resulted in milk fat with higher proportions of healthful fatty acids without affecting milk yield or composition of milk.
Our objective was to determine the extent to which a stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen regulated the growth and subsequent lactation performance of developing beef heifers. Forty crossbred beef (Angus x Gelbvieh) heifer calves were assigned to either a control or stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen. Heifers fed the stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen were fed according to an alternating schedule beginning with a high energy diet (130% of the metabolizable energy recommended by the National Research Council) for 2 mo, followed by an energy restricted diet (70% of the recommended metabolizable energy) for 3 mo, and concluding with the high energy diet again for 2 mo. Thereafter, all heifers received the control diet. The average daily gain of heifers fed the stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen was 2-fold higher than that of control heifers during the final high energy phase. The RNA and protein contents in the mammary tissues of heifers fed the experimental regimen in early lactation were greater than those of control heifers. Lipid content was significantly reduced in the mammary tissues of heifers fed the experimental regimen. The expression of beta-casein in the mammary tissues of heifers fed the experimental regimen was higher than that of the control heifers. Heifers fed the stair-step regimen yielded 6% more milk than did those fed the control regimen. Total protein and casein in milk of heifers fed the experimental regimen were higher than those in milk of control heifers. These results indicate that the stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen enhanced mammary development and subsequent lactation performance.
Bovine casein gene cluster belongs to the best studied regions of the bovine genome. However, molecular basis of the regulation of casein gene expression is still of great interest for the advancement of milk production. Identification of crucial regulatory regions governing casein gene expression would provide valuable information for marker assisted selection in dairy cattle. In our study we performed comparative analysis of the bovine beta-and kappa casein gene promoter sequences with the regulatory sequences from some other species. In addition, we used homologous mammary gland derived cell culture and luciferase reporter gene system to confirm the functionality of the proximal beta and kappa casein promoters. The longer kappa casein promoter (2064 bp) showed the highest expression level, followed by the short kappa casein promoter (925 bp) and beta casein promoter (1692 bp). Here we demonstrate the suitability of the bovine mammary gland derived cell line BME UV1 for transient gene expression under transcriptional control of the bovine casein gene promoters and compare functionality of different fragments of bovine beta-and kappa casein gene promoters using homologous in vitro system. Zusammenfassung Titel der Arbeit: Funktionsanalyse der Rinder β-und κ-Kaseingenpromotoren mit Hilfe der homologen Euterzelllinie Kasein Gen Cluster beim Rind gehören zu den am besten untersuchten Teilen des Rindergenoms. Trotzdem herrscht noch immer groβes Interesse an detaillierten Studien über die molekulare Basis der Regulation der Kaseingen-Expression zur Steigerung der Milchproduktion. Die Entdeckung der Hauptregulationsmechanismen der Kaseingen-Expression wäre von groβer Bedeutung für die markergestützte Selektion der Milchkühe. In unserer Studie haben wir die Promotorsequenzen der Rinder beta-und kappa-Kaseingene im Vergleich zu einigen anderen Säugetierarten untersucht. Die Rinder-Euterzellen BME UV1 und das Luziferase Reportergen System wurden für die Bestätigung der Funktionalität der Rinder β-und κ-Kaseingenpromoters in vitro eingesetzt. Der längere κ-Kaseingen Promoter (2064 bp) hat die stärkste Expression gezeigt, gefolgt von dem kurzen κ-Kaseingen Promoter (925 bp) und dem β-Kaseingen Promoter (1692 bp). Hier können wir demonstrieren, dass die Rindereuterzelllinie BME UV1 für die vorübergehende Genexpression unter der Kontrolle der Rinderkaseingenpromotoren geeignet ist. Die Funktion von verschiedenen Teilen der Rinder β− und κ-Kaseingenpromotern wurde in einem homologen in vitro System verglichen.
The proper use of a time-dependent and controlled nutrition regimen during the hormonesensitive growth phase before first parturition can significantly affect mammary growth and subsequent lactation performance. The objective of the present study was to determine if a compensatory nutrition regimen improves lactation performance by affecting proliferation and apoptosis of mammary epithelial cells. Forty female rats (7 weeks of age, average weight 148 g) were assigned to either (1) control, free access to diet or (2) stair-step compensatory nutrition regimen, an alternating 3-4-week schedule beginning with an energy-restricted diet (3 1.2 % restriction) for 3 weeks, followed by the control diet for 4 weeks. Estimated milk yield was greater (P < 0.05) on day 15 of lactation in the compensatory nutrition group than in the control group. Mammary cell proliferation values were 1.4-and 2.7-fold greater in mammary tissue from the compensatory group during pregnant and early lactating stages respectively, compared with those from the control group. Ornithine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.17)mRNA was 24% higher (P(O.05) in mammary tissues of rats from the compensatory nutrition group during pregnancy than in those from the control group. These results indicate that the compensatory nutrition regimen imposed during the peripubertal growth phase stimulated mammary epithelial cell proliferation and improved lactation performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.