The lateral short axis in-plane technique should be considered the first-line technique for IJV cannulation.

Intraarterial infusion of paclitaxel in albumin nanoparticles proved reproducible and effective and deserves further investigation as induction chemotherapy before definitive treatment of advanced tumors of the tongue, with a view to organ preservation.

BACKGROUND This study was designed to determine the feasibility, maximum tolerated dose, and toxicities of intraarterial administration of paclitaxel‐albumin nanoparticles in patients with advanced head and neck and recurrent anal canal squamous cell carcinoma. Antitumor activity also was assessed. METHODS Forty‐three patients (31 with advanced head and neck and 12 with recurrent anal canal squamous cell carcinoma) were treated intraarterially with ABI‐007 every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. In total, 120 treatment cycles were completed, 86 in patients with head and neck carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1–4) and 34 in patients with anal canal carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1–4). ABI‐007 was compared preliminarily with Taxol® for in vitro cytostatic activity. Increasing dose levels from 120 to 300 mg/m2 were studied in 18 patients. Pharmacokinetic profiles after intraarterial administration were obtained in a restricted number of patients. RESULTS The dose‐limiting toxicity of ABI‐007 was myelosuppression consisting of Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 patients. Nonhematologic toxicities included total alopecia (30 patients), gastrointestinal toxicity (3 patients, Grade 2), skin toxicity (5 patients, Grade 2), neurologic toxicity (4 patients, Grade 2) ocular toxicity (1 patient, Grade 2), flu‐like syndrome (7 patients, Grade 2; 1 patient, Grade 3). In total, 120 transfemoral, percutaneous catheterization procedure–related complications occurred only during catheterization of the neck vessels in 3 patients (2 TIA, 1 hemiparesis) and resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS Intraarterial administration of ABI‐007 by percutaneous catheterization does not require premedication, is easy and reproducible, and has acceptable toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose in a single administration was 270 mg/m2. Most dose levels showed considerable antitumor activity (42 assessable patients with 80.9% complete response and partial response). The recommended Phase II dose is 230 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Cancer 2001;92:2592–602. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

No abstract

Non-surgical ablation is a feasible, safe and repeatable procedure in patients with pancreatic insulinoma, who are not candidate to surgery or refuse it. Partial or complete control of symptoms and tumor growth is experienced by the majority of patients.

The Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) system, which uses surgical cannulas up to 20 mm in diameter, is an alternative to conventional surgical biopsy for the diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions. Since the need for radiological skill outweighs the surgical content of the technique, we evaluated the feasibility of complete management of the procedure by interventional radiologists. 35 of the 111 patients originally scheduled for the procedure were excluded, three because the lesion could not be visualized and 32 because of insufficient thickness of the compressed breast. The procedure had to be abandoned in one case due to a technical failure. 77 stereotactic excisional breast biopsy procedures were performed using the ABBI system in 75 patients with suspicious non-palpable mammographic lesions. The procedure was carried out under local anaesthesia in the radiology department, using a dedicated Lorad (R) radiographic system. 31 (40%) masses without calcifications, 11 (14%) masses with calcifications and 35 (46%) clusters of microcalcifications without tumour mass were sampled. 43 (56%) benign lesions and 34 (44%) malignant lesions were diagnosed. The overall mean diameter of the lesions was 8.7 mm (range 3-22 mm). All 34 patients with malignancies and lobular carcinoma in situ subsequently underwent surgery, the results of which are reported. Three (4%) haematomas were detected and aspirated percutaneously. Two technical problems occurred: an ABBI cannula malfunction, and a computer failure of the digital imaging system during the procedure. The average procedure time was 80 min and the cost of each procedure was 2,800,000 Italian lire (1555 US$). It is concluded that tissue sampling with the ABBI system can be performed entirely by radiologists without significant problems. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. The quality of the biopsy specimen was identical to that of a surgical specimen but with the advantages of stereotactic precision for localization of the lesion.

The use of totally implantable venous access devices in radiology may be associated with complications such as occlusion of the system (because of the high density of some contrast), infection (if the port is not handled in aseptic conditions, using proper barrier protections), and mechanical complications due to the high-pressure administration of contrast by automatic injectors (so-called power injector), including extravasation of contrast media into the soft tissues, subintimal venous or myocardial injection, or serious damage to the device itself (breakage of the external connections, dislocation of the non-coring needle, or breakage of the catheter). The last problem - i.e., the damage of the device from a power injection - is not an unjustified fear, but a reality. A warning by the US Food and Drug Administration of July 2004 reports around 250 complications of this kind, referring to both port and central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheter systems, which occurred over a period of several years; in all cases, the damage occurred during the injection of contrast material by means of power injectors for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Though the risk associated with the use of ports in radiodiagnostics is thus clear, it has been suggested that administration of the contrast material via the port may have some advantage in terms of image quality, increased comfort for the patient, and maybe more accurate reproducibility of the patient's own follow-up exams. This contention needs to be supported by evidence. Also, since many cancer patients who need frequent computed tomography studies already have totally implantable systems, it would seem reasonable to try to define how and when such systems may safely be used. The purpose of this consensus statement is to define recommendations based on the best available evidence, for the safe use of implantable ports in radiodiagnostics.

No abstract