Background and objectivesThere is a limited appreciation of the epidemiology of dialysis-receiving AKI in children. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate changes in the incidence of dialysis-receiving AKI among children over a period of 20 years in Ontario, Canada. The secondary objectives were to assess temporal trends in the utilization of various dialysis modalities and 30-day mortality among children with dialysis-receiving AKI.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsAll children (29 days to 18 years) who received their first dialysis for AKI between 1996 and 2015 were identified from healthcare administrative databases. Those who received dialysis for ESKD, inborn errors of metabolism, and poisonings were excluded. The incidence rates of dialysis-receiving AKI were reported annually. The Cochran—Armitage test was used to assess trends in the incidence and short-term mortality after dialysis-receiving AKI.ResultsWe identified 1394 children treated with dialysis for AKI during a hospital stay. There was a significant increase in the incidence of dialysis-receiving AKI among hospitalized children from 1996 (0.58 per 1000 person-years) to 2015 (0.65 per 1000 person-years) (P=0.01). The use of continuous kidney replacement therapy and intermittent hemodialysis increased whereas the relative use of peritoneal dialysis declined over time. Thirty-day mortality rates after dialysis-receiving AKI increased from 14% to 25% between 1996 and 2009 and reduced to 19% in the more recent years (P=0.03).ConclusionsIn Ontario, the incidence of dialysis-receiving AKI among children has increased between 1996 and 2015. The use of peritoneal dialysis for AKI has declined and the short-term mortality after dialysis-receiving AKI has increased.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Operative classification of ventral abdominal hernias: new and practical classification. Yasser Selim. From the Ministry of Health.Background: Ventral hernias of the abdomen are defined as a noninguinal, nonhiatal defect in the fascia of the abdominal wall. Unfortunately, there is not currently a universal classification system for ventral hernias. One of the more accepted classification systems is that of the European Hernia Society (EHS). Its limitation is that it does not include individual patient risk factors and wound classification. The aim of this work was to find out the basic principles of hernia etiology and pathogenesis, clarify the factors that are important in treatment of ventral hernias, and categorize hernia patients according to those factors. Methods: This retrospective study included 238 patients who presented to our surgery department between 2010 and 2020. A full description of ventral hernias was made, including their type according to the EHS. In addition, abdominal wall components were assessed, including strength of rectus muscles, lateral abdominal muscles, and abdominal fascia, namely the linea alba. Patients with spontaneous hernias were grouped according to the size of the defect and the condition of the rectus abdominis muscles, the fascia and other abdominal muscles. Results: Patients were put into 6 clinical categories: type 1A, type 1B, type 2, type 3, type 4, and type 5. The grouping of patients was done according to the factors we believed affect the choice of surgical procedure and the prognosis of repair. Patients with types 1 and 2 have normal abdominal muscles, whereas those with types 3 and 4 have weak muscles and weak stretched fascia (linea alba). Type 5 includes incisional hernias. Conclusion: The primary purpose of any classification should be to improve the possibility of comparing different studies and their results. By describing hernias in a standardized way, different patient populations can be compared. Numerous classifications for groin and ventral hernias have been proposed over the past 5-6 decades. For primary abdominal wall hernias, there was agreement with EHS classification on the use of localization and size as classification variables.

No abstract