No abstract

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are globally escalating major health care issues.For both obesity and T2DM management, it has been well established that bariatric surgery is superior to lifestyle and medical management alone. Over the past two decades, the introduction of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) has seen a marked rise in usage, and combined with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), these two procedures represent more than 80% of all bariatric surgeries globally.However, the differences in effectiveness between these two procedures have been less clearly defined. This article will serve as a focused review of the literature comparing LRYGB and LVSG for T2DM management.Based on our review, we believe that both procedures are very effective at improving T2DM care, especially compared with conventional medical management. However, there may be a modest benefit to be had by using LRYGB over LVSG.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the standard of care for diagnosis and evaluation of colorectal cancers before surgery. However, varied practices and heterogenous documentation affects communication between endoscopists and operating surgeons, hampering surgical planning. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop recommendations for the use of standardized localization and reporting practices for colorectal lesions identified during lower GI endoscopy. DESIGN: A systematic review of existing endoscopy guidelines and thorough narrative review of the overall endoscopy literature were performed to identify existing practices recommended globally. SETTING: An online Delphi process was used to establish consensus recommendations based on a literature review. PATIENTS: Colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists from across Canada who had previously demonstrated leadership in endoscopy, managed large endoscopy programs, produced high-impact publications in the field of endoscopy, or participated in the development of endoscopy guidelines were selected to participate. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were colorectal lesion localization and documentation practice recommendations important to planning surgical or advanced endoscopic excisions. RESULTS: A total of 129 of 197 statements achieved consensus after 3 rounds of voting by 23 experts from across Canada. There was more than 90% participation in each round. Recommendations varied according to lesion location in the cecum, colon, or rectum and whether the referral was planned for surgical or advanced endoscopic resection. Recommendations were provided for appropriate documentation, indications, location, and method of tattoo placement, in addition to photograph and real-time 3-dimensional scope configuration device use. LIMITATIONS: Because of a paucity of evidence, recommendations are based primarily on expert opinion. There may be bias, as all representatives were based in Canada. CONCLUSIONS: Best practices to optimize endoscopic lesion localization and communication are not addressed in previous guidelines. This consensus involving national experts in colorectal surgery and gastroenterology provides a framework for efficient and effective colorectal lesion localization. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C71. RECOMENDACIONES PARA LA LOCALIZACIÓN ENDOSCÓPICA ÓPTIMA DE LAS NEOPLASIAS COLORRECTALES: UN CONSENSO DELPHI DE EXPERTOS NACIONALES ANTECEDENTES: La colonoscopia es el estándar de atención para el diagnóstico y la evaluación de los cánceres colorrectales antes de la cirugía. Sin embargo, las prácticas variadas y la documentación heterogénea afectan la comunicación entre los endoscopistas y los cirujanos operadores, lo que dificulta la planificación quirúrgica. OBJETIVO: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo desarrollar recomendaciones para el uso de prácticas estandarizadas de localización y notificación de lesiones colorrectales identificadas en la endoscopia gastrointestinal inferior. DISEÑO: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de las pautas de endoscopia existentes y una revisión narrativa exhaustiva de la literatura general sobre endoscopia para identificar las prácticas existentes recomendadas a nivel mundial. Se utilizó un proceso Delphi en línea para establecer recomendaciones de consenso basadas en la revisión de la literatura. PARTICIPANTES: Se seleccionaron para participar cirujanos colorrectales y gastroenterólogos de todo Canadá que previamente habían demostrado liderazgo en endoscopia, manejado grandes programas de endoscopia, producido publicaciones de alto impacto en el campo de la endoscopia o que habían participado en el desarrollo de pautas de endoscopia. RESULTADOS: Localización de lesiones colorrectales y recomendaciones prácticas de documentación importantes para planificar escisiones quirúrgicas o endoscópicas avanzadas. RESULTADOS: 129 de 197 declaraciones lograron consenso después de tres rondas de votación de 23 expertos de todo Canadá. Hubo >90% de participación en cada ronda. Las recomendaciones variaron según la ubicación de la lesión en el ciego, colon o recto, y si se planificó la derivación para resección quirúrgica o endoscópica avanzada. Se proporcionaron recomendaciones para la documentación adecuada, las indicaciones, la ubicación y el método de colocación del tatuaje, además de la fotografía y el uso del dispositivo de configuración del alcance 3D en tiempo real. LIMITACIONES: Debido a la escasez de evidencia, las recomendaciones se basan principalmente en la opinión de expertos. Puede haber sesgo, ya que los representantes tenían su sede en Canadá. CONCLUSIONES: Las mejores prácticas para optimizar la localización y comunicación de lesiones endoscópicas no se abordan en las guías anteriores. Este consenso que involucra a expertos nacionales en cirugía colorrectal y gastroenterología proporciona un marco para la localización eficiente y efectiva de lesiones colorrectales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C71. (Traducción—Dr. Mauricio Santamaria)

Background: There is an important disconnect between surgical programs and primary care physicians (PCP) in the delivery of bariatric care. The objective of this study is to assess PCP knowledge and perception of a provincial bariatric surgery program.Methods: A 32-question, IRB approved, survey was developed by bariatric surgery experts and vetted by local PCPs. A single round of paper surveys was administered to 1,000 PCPs between July and September 2015. Continuous variables were assessed by t-test and categorical variables by Chi-square test.Results: There were 131 survey responses (13.1%). Half (54.2%) of respondents did not feel equipped to counsel their patients on operative management strategies. PCPs counselled on average 11.6%±17.0% of their obese patients on bariatric surgery. Many respondents (58.3%) thought excess weight loss from gastric bypass was less than 40% and most believed there was less than 50% resolution of diabetes (62.4%), hypertension (72.3%), dyslipidemia (77.8%) and obstructive sleep apnea (60.6%). PCPs who referred patients to the bariatric program (71.8%) were more comfortable counselling their patients on bariatric surgery options (56.8% vs. 17.1%, P<0.001) and were more comfortable with post-operative care (67.4% vs.38.2%, P=0.004). Additionally, these PCPs estimated higher rates of diabetes and hypertension resolution post-bariatric surgery. The predominant perceived barrier to accessing bariatric surgery was wait times (33.3%).Conclusions: PCPs appear to underestimate the efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of obesity and feel ill-equipped to counsel patients. Further education related to bariatric surgery may improve PCP comfort in counselling and long-term follow-up.

BackgroundProphylactic cholecystectomy following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy (ERCP-S) remains the gold standard management of choledocholithiasis. Some clinicians propose ERCP-S alone as the definitive management in the elderly, given perioperative complication risks. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of non-operative management of choledocholithiasis in adults aged ≥70. MethodologyA total of 252 patients aged ≥70 underwent ERCP from 2004 to 2014 at a single institution. The rates of cholecystectomy, ERCP, complications, and mortality were gathered. Data were linked to a provincial health database to capture follow-up visits to alternate hospitals. Predictors of operation, recurrence, and mortality were analyzed using multivariable regression. ResultsFollowing ERCP, of the 252 patients, 33 (13.1%) underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy within three months, while 219 (86.9%) were initially managed conservatively. Of the 219 patients, 147 (67.1%) experienced no further choledocholithiasis after conservative management, while 23 (10.5%) patients underwent cholecystectomy. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. Delayed operative patients were younger (mean age: 77.56 vs. 82.90; p < 0.001) and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (1.04 vs. 1.84; p = 0.030). When adjusted for age, CCI score, and sex, cholecystectomy was associated with increased survival, with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% confidence interval = 0.26-0.90; p = 0.021). Perioperative complications occurred in 7/56 (12.5%) patients. ConclusionsRecurrent choledocholithiasis is common in elderly patients. Despite recurrent symptoms, these patients are unlikely to undergo cholecystectomy. Surgeons operate on patients with greater life expectancy and fewer comorbidities with high success despite advanced patient age. Future prospective studies should examine objective criteria for prophylactic cholecystectomy in this population, given purported safety and benefits.

Background Circular staplers are commonly used for reconstruction after radical resection for colorectal cancer. Pathological analysis of the anastomotic rings is common practice, although the benefits are unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of routine histopathological analysis of anastomotic rings in an original series and in a systematic review of the literature. Method The retrospective study was performed at two university-associated academic hospitals in Winnipeg, Canada, including patients investigated for colorectal cancers (within 30 cm of the anal verge) who underwent resection between 2007 and 2020. The systematic review involved Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, selecting for adult human studies involving analysis of anastomotic rings in elective colorectal cancer resections. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients with cancer in the anastomotic ring specimens. The frequency of benign pathology findings and changes to patient management were also examined. Results Out of 673 eligible patients, 487 were included in the retrospective analysis. No patients had cancer within the anastomotic ring specimens. Twenty-five patients (5.1 per cent) had benign pathological findings within the anastomotic ring specimens, and patient management was never affected. In the systematic review, 27 articles were included in the final analysis out of 5848 records reviewed. The rate of cancer within anastomotic ring specimens was 0.34 per cent, and the rate of change in patient management was 0.19 per cent. Conclusion The likelihood of finding cancer within anastomotic rings is rare and their histopathological examination seldom changes patient management.

No abstract