Sepsis is one of the most important causes of death in intensive care units. Despite the fact that sepsis pathogenesis remains obscure, there is increasing evidence that oxidants and antioxidants play a key role. The imbalance of the abovementioned substances in favor of oxidants is called oxidative stress, and it contributes to sepsis process. The most important consequences are vascular permeability impairment, decreased cardiac performance, and mitochondrial malfunction leading to impaired respiration. Nitric oxide is perhaps the most important and well-studied oxidant. Selenium, vitamin C, and 3N-acetylcysteine among others are potential therapies for the restoration of redox balance in sepsis. Results from recent studies are promising, but there is a need for more human studies in a clinical setting for safety and efficiency evaluation.

Background Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at higher risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). No study has evaluated the relationship between VAP and mortality in this population, or compared this relationship between SARS-CoV-2 patients and other populations. The main objective of our study was to determine the relationship between VAP and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods Planned ancillary analysis of a multicenter retrospective European cohort. VAP was diagnosed using clinical, radiological and quantitative microbiological criteria. Univariable and multivariable marginal Cox’s regression models, with cause-specific hazard for duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, were used to compare outcomes between study groups. Extubation, and ICU discharge alive were considered as events of interest, and mortality as competing event. Findings Of 1576 included patients, 568 were SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 482 influenza pneumonia, and 526 no evidence of viral infection at ICU admission. VAP was associated with significantly higher risk for 28-day mortality in SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.16–2.47), p = 0.006), and influenza groups (1.75 (1.03–3.02), p = 0.045), but not in the no viral infection group (1.07 (0.64–1.78), p = 0.79). VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation in the SARS-CoV-2 group, but not in the influenza or no viral infection groups. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of ICU stay in the 3 study groups. No significant difference was found in heterogeneity of outcomes related to VAP between the 3 groups, suggesting that the impact of VAP on mortality was not different between study groups. Interpretation VAP was associated with significantly increased 28-day mortality rate in SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, as compared to influenza pneumonia or no viral infection, did not significantly modify the relationship between VAP and 28-day mortality. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04359693.

The pathways underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (ECOPD) remain unclear. This study describes the clinical, functional and biochemical changes during recovery from ECOPD. Thirty hospitalized patients with Anthonisen's type-I ECOPD were evaluated on days 0 (admission), 3, 10 and 40. A five-symptom score (TSS), performance status and quality of life were evaluated. Post-bronchodilator spirometry, blood gases, oxidative stress, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid-A (SAA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and fibrinogen were also measured. Patients were classified as early- or late-recoverers, based on whether dyspnea had returned to pre-exacerbation level by day 10. Most clinical, functional and biochemical parameters improved during follow-up. CRP and IL-6 levels reduced on Day 3 (p<0.05), whereas SAA on Day 10 (p<0.01). TNF-alpha was reduced on Days 3 and 10, but on Day 40 its levels returned to baseline. Fibrinogen and WBC reduced only by day 40. TSS and dyspnea were correlated inversely with FEV(1) on days 3, 10 and 40. Although late-recoverers had lower FEV(1) on admission, none of the reported measurements on admission and day 3 predicted early recovery. During recovery from ECOPD, symptomatic improvement correlates only with post-bronchodilator FEV(1) whereas systemic inflammatory burden subsidence does not correlate with clinical and functional changes. Although late-recoverers have lower FEV(1) on admission, none of the measured parameters is able to predict early symptomatic recovery.

To the Editor: Recently, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 guidelines and ATS suggest that a ventilatory strategy complying with the ARDSnet protocol should be applied to manage COVID-19 pneumonia [1-3]. However, "COVID-19 lung" pathophysiology seems to be divergent from the "ARDS lung"; hence, heart-lung interactions may be more pronounced than initially considered [2, 3]. We studied 17 patients (March 20-April 14, 2020) treated in two Greek University Intensive Care Units. Patients had COVID-19 pneumonia fulfilling the Berlin criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and were on the 2nd or 3rd day of invasive mechanical ventilation. Positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) was set according to predefined criteria [1-3]. Mean tidal volume (± standard deviation) was 6.8 ± 0.9 ml/kg ideal body weight (469 ± 64 ml), respiratory rate was 29.5 ± 3.7 breaths/min, and the fraction of inspired oxygen was 82 ± 12%. After measuring respiratory mechanics, arterial blood gases, and hemodynamics, we decreased PEEP by 25-30% (other mechanical ventilation variables remained stable). We re-evaluated measurements (1 h later) focusing on the effects of PEEP reduction on respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and fluid balance in a 12-h window before and after the PEEP change. Mean PEEP reduction by 29% significantly increased respiratory system compliance and reduced hypercapnia, while oxygenation (PaO 2 /FiO 2) did not worsen (Table 1). PEEP reduction was not accompanied by lung derecruitment, as oxygenation was not deteriorated. Rather PEEP reduction decreased lung overdistension as interpreted by the increase in respiratory system compliance and decrease in dead space ventilation (reduced PaCO 2). Concerning hemodynamics, PEEP reduction was followed by a substantial decrease in noradrenaline dose,

Background Recent multicenter studies identified COVID-19 as a risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). However, no large multicenter study has compared the incidence of IPA between COVID-19 and influenza patients. Objectives To determine the incidence of putative IPA in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients, compared with influenza patients. Methods This study was a planned ancillary analysis of the coVAPid multicenter retrospective European cohort. Consecutive adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia or influenza pneumonia were included. The 28-day cumulative incidence of putative IPA, based on Blot definition, was the primary outcome. IPA incidence was estimated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method, considering extubation (dead or alive) within 28 days as competing event. Results A total of 1047 patients were included (566 in the SARS-CoV-2 group and 481 in the influenza group). The incidence of putative IPA was lower in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia group (14, 2.5%) than in influenza pneumonia group (29, 6%), adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (cHR) 3.29 (95% CI 1.53–7.02, p = 0.0006). When putative IPA and Aspergillus respiratory tract colonization were combined, the incidence was also significantly lower in the SARS-CoV-2 group, as compared to influenza group (4.1% vs. 10.2%), adjusted cHR 3.21 (95% CI 1.88–5.46, p < 0.0001). In the whole study population, putative IPA was associated with significant increase in 28-day mortality rate, and length of ICU stay, compared with colonized patients, or those with no IPA or Aspergillus colonization. Conclusions Overall, the incidence of putative IPA was low. Its incidence was significantly lower in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia than in those with influenza pneumonia. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04359693.

Data on the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients are limited. The present retrospective observational cohort study, which was conducted in two general intensive care units (ICUs) in central Greece, compared critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients suffering from carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections receiving CAZ-AVI to patients who received appropriate available antibiotic therapy. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety issues were evaluated. A secondary analysis in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) was conducted. Forty-one patients that received CAZ-AVI (the CAZ-AVI group) were compared to 36 patients that received antibiotics other than CAZ-AVI (the control group). There was a significant improvement in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on days 4 and 10 in the CAZ-AVI group compared to that in the control group (P = 0.006, and P = 0.003, respectively). Microbiological eradication was accomplished in 33/35 (94.3%) patients in the CAZ-AVI group and 21/31 (67.7%) patients in the control group (P = 0.021), and clinical cure was observed in 33/41 (80.5%) versus 19/36 (52.8%) patients (P = 0.010), respectively. The results were similar in the BSI subgroups for both outcomes (P = 0.038 and P = 0.014, respectively). The 28-day survival was 85.4% in the CAZ-AVI group and 61.1% in the control group (log-rank test = 0.035), while there were 2 and 12 relapses in the CAZ-AVI and control groups, respectively (P = 0.042). A CAZ-AVI-containing regime was an independent predictor of survival and clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 5.575 and P = 0.012 and OR = 5.125 and P = 0.004, respectively), as was illness severity. No significant side effects were recorded. In conclusion, a CAZ-AVI-containing regime was more effective than other available antibiotic agents for the treatment of CRE infections in the high-risk, mechanically ventilated ICU population evaluated.

Cardiac dysfunction may complicate the course of severe sepsis and septic shock with significant implications for patient's survival. The basic pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to septic cardiomyopathy have not been fully clarified until now. Disease-specific treatment is lacking, and care is still based on supportive modalities. Septic state causes destruction of redox balance in many cell types, cardiomyocytes included. The production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species is increased, and natural antioxidant systems fail to counterbalance the overwhelming generation of free radicals. Reactive species interfere with many basic cell functions, mainly through destruction of protein, lipid, and nucleic acid integrity, compromising enzyme function, mitochondrial structure and performance, and intracellular signaling, all leading to cardiac contractile failure. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy may result from oxidative imbalance. This review will address the multiple aspects of cardiomyocyte bioenergetic failure in sepsis and discuss potential therapeutic interventions.

The data on long-term application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to COPD are contradictory. We evaluated the effect of the addition of NIV to optimal treatment for 1 year on the quality of life of stable hypercapnic COPD patients. NIV was offered to 49 of 58 initially enrolled consecutive patients, of whom 22 refused NIV and comprised the standard treatment group whereas 27 received NIV. Quality of life was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire. Additional measurements included blood gases, pulmonary function tests, dyspnea, daytime sleepiness, exacerbations and hospitalizations. The NIV group showed a significant improvement in quality of life in the third month, both in the Physical (31+/-4 to 38+/-8, p<0.0001) and the Mental Component Summary Score (28+/-7 to 40+/-10, p=0.009), that was maintained until the twelfth month. PaCO2 decreased by the first month in the NIV group (54+/-4.5 to 44.6+/-5.6 mmHg, p<0.0001), and PaO2 rose during the sixth month (58.9+/-5.7 to 64.4+/-6.5 mmHg, p=0.004). Dyspnea and diurnal sleepiness improved significantly. No significant improvements were observed in the control group. Patients on NIV spent less days in the hospital compared to controls. NIV when added to optimal medical treatment has beneficial effects on quality of life in stable hypercapnic COPD patients, with additional improvements in arterial blood gases, dyspnea and daytime sleepiness.