2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03874-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 or influenza pneumonia: a European multicenter comparative cohort study

Abstract: Background Recent multicenter studies identified COVID-19 as a risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). However, no large multicenter study has compared the incidence of IPA between COVID-19 and influenza patients. Objectives To determine the incidence of putative IPA in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients, compared with influenza patients. Methods This study was a planned ancillary analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…After excluding the articles for pre-specified reasons, the final 38 papers were included in the systematic review (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1). All of the papers were observational in design (n=38), of which 10 were prospective [15][16][17]19,24,36,40,41,44,48] and 26 retrospective studies [18,[20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39]42,43]. Among them, 8 studies were classified as case-series [18,21,22,27,37,40,45,47].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After excluding the articles for pre-specified reasons, the final 38 papers were included in the systematic review (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1). All of the papers were observational in design (n=38), of which 10 were prospective [15][16][17]19,24,36,40,41,44,48] and 26 retrospective studies [18,[20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39]42,43]. Among them, 8 studies were classified as case-series [18,21,22,27,37,40,45,47].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By implementing NOS, we assessed 30 analytical studies (the remaining 8 studies were descriptive in design). Overall, we identified 12 studies of "good" quality [15,22,27,28,36,41,45,46,48,[50][51][52] and 18 studies of "poor" quality [16][17][18][19][20][21][23][24][25][26][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39][40][42][43][44]47,49]. The majority of studies were deemed to be lacking in terms of "Comparability" criterion, as the aforementioned 26 studies did not control for any confounding factors (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations