GCTTS can be confused cytologically with giant cell rich lesions of bone and soft tissue and pigment containing lesions including melanoma. Ladybird cell is a characteristic feature seen in this lesion. Proper clinicoradiological correlation is essential before offering a diagnosis of GCTTS on cytology.

The recognition of "vanishing endometrial carcinoma" as a distinct entity is of utmost importance to avoid mislabeling them as medical errors.

Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) is emerging as a promising marker for assessing cardiovascular risk. GGT predicts cardiovascular mortality in the population and is positively associated with traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was undertaken on 200 north Indian CAD patients diagnosed with coronary angiography to study relation of GGT with risk factors for CAD and severity of CAD. GGT values ranged from 5 to 69U/L and were divided in 4 quartiles. GGT was positively associated with triglyceride (p=0.008) and VLDL cholesterol (p=0.002) in our subjects. Also an increase in total cholesterol from GGT quartile I to quartile IV (p=0.28) was noted.

The most common cause of incorrect diagnosis was sampling error and a definitive diagnosis was not provided in adnexal tumors due to overlap of cytologic features and lack of availability of architectural features. The knowledge of cytological features of the skin adnexal tumor is helpful to avoid any mistaken diagnosis. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:681-688. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Introduction Fine needle aspiration is a well‐established technique for evaluating primary and secondary bony lesions. With use in selected cases, it achieves a diagnostic yield comparable to biopsies. Methods Cases of osteosarcoma (OS) with available histological follow‐up were retrieved over a 10‐year period. Detailed morphological evaluation was done, with special emphasis on pitfalls in the diagnosis of OS on cytology and the various variants of OS. Results Of the 41 cases with available follow‐up histology, 56% were correctly diagnosed as OS on cytology. The most common false‐negative cytological diagnosis of OS, in 17% cases, was giant cell tumour. The possible explanations for this included low cellularity, minimal atypia, absence of typical osteoid, misinterpretation of metachromatic osteoid material as fibro‐collagenous material and non‐availability of radiology at time of aspiration. Conclusion A triple‐phase evaluation including clinical evaluation, appropriate radiological correlation and cytology/histopathology, is important to clinch an accurate diagnosis.

Congenital hepatic fibrosis is characterized by hepatic fibrosis, portal hypertension, and renal cystic disease. Typical presentation of congenital hepatic fibrosis is in the form of portal hypertension, in adolescents and young adults. We present an unusual case of neonatal cholestasis with rapid deterioration within first 4 months of life, who was diagnosed to have congenital hepatic fibrosis with polycystic kidney disease on autopsy.

Reactive and neoplastic plasma cells can display considerable morphological anaplasia as well as variable immunoreactivity for epithelial markers including epithelial membrane antigen, pan-cytokeratin (panCK) and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, potentially creating diagnostic dilemmas. We describe the case of a 51-year-old male, previously treated for IgGλ plasma cell myeloma, whose bone marrow biopsy showed focal replacement by sheets of pleomorphic malignant cells and grade 3 myelofibrosis, raising the morphological possibility of a carcinomatous infiltration. First-line immunohistochemistry revealed strong panCK as well as CD138 positivity. However, subsequent MUM-1 and CD38 stains were also positive, clinching the diagnosis of relapsed plasma cell myeloma with anaplastic morphology and aberrant strong cytokeratin expression. The case warns of the perils of using limited immunohistochemical panels in poorly differentiated metastatic neoplasms and the importance of providing a complete clinical background to the reporting pathologist.

Despite being a commonly encountered infection, the clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis of the uterine cervix is elusive. Though a straightforward diagnosis on tissue sections, identification of typical features of tubercular infection on cervical Pap samples is challenging. In our experience, the infrequent pale staining collections of epithelioid cells are difficult to pick up on Pap stained smears, particularly LBC samples. In this series, 2 of the three samples were reported as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance while 1 was reported as inflammatory at the initial diagnosis. Scattered Langhans' type giant cells may be seen as a subtle clue which should prompt the search for epithelioid cell granulomas. These cases may have a mass lesion clinically while no obvious signs of malignancy on the cervical samples.