During the last two decades the traditional subjective appraisal of the body fat stores in farm animals, made by eye and touch, has been rationalized by the introduction of numerical systems of rating specific anatomical points.Palpation of the lumbar vertebrae, the pin and hook bones (tail head) (Lowman et al. 1973), and, occasionally, width behind the shoulders (Treacher et al. 1986) provides an assessment of the fatness of the animal. This is calibrated from standard photographic charts, in the use of which the operator is trained. Body condition scoring (CS) by this method has been widely developed for dairy cows (Earle, 1976; Mulvany, 1977; MacCarthy, 1978; Scott & Smeaton, 1980; Wildman et al. 1982; Aalseth et al. 1983; Anon. 1986; Garcia Paloma, 1990).The actual numerical scales have varied among systems. Thus over the range from very thin to very fat cows the scale is 1, 2…7, 8 (Earle, 1976) and 0½, 1,…4½, 5 (Mulvany, 1977), for example. CS is thus a discrete variate with a limited number of readings. Several authors have sought to decrease the division size, for example 1, 1 1/3; 1 2/3;…4 2/3, 5 (Ducker et al. 1985a, see also Dewhurst et al. 1996) and by using the means of the separate values obtained by two operators judging CS independently (W. H. Broster, V. J. Broster, A. J. Clements, J. W. Siviter and T. Smith, unpublished results). In this review CS will be stated in the units given by Mulvany (1977), to which other ranges have been scaled. Inspection of CS data has usually been conducted by analysis of variance, but also by the Mann–Whitney signed rank test (Moorby et al. 1996).Evans (1978) and Nicoll (1981) studied the variation in recording CS. Both investigators concluded that a system of observation by two independent assessors per recording occasion is advantageous and that revision training is necessary to maintain operator standardization. Of total variance in CS, some 60–70% was found attributable to ‘between-animal’ differences, <5% to assessor variation and <10% to animal×assessor variation. Croxton & Stollard (1976) found good repeatability of CS measurements ‘between’ and ‘within’ operators. It is regrettable that few reports of experimentation give full details of method of and number of operators engaged in body score recording.

This is regarded as the prolongation of the effects of differential feeding after this itself has ceased. Compensatory effect Supernormal performance on re-alimentation following a period of underfeeding, as with growing stock, is included in this category. Buffering effect This is regarded as the cow's ability to counter nutritional insults by withdrawal of body reserves to support milk production. Total effect This is the summated effect over the total period of application of differential feeding. The main emphasis in this review will be placed on cumulative and residual effects of plane of nutrition within a single lactation together with effects over multiple lactations. These discussions are preceded by notes on the lactation curve, relevant aspects of experimentation, and immediate effects on performance of plane of nutrition.

Food utilization by lactating dairy cows was studied in a randomized experiment covering the first 24 weeks of lactation, with further observations on performance over the remainder of the lactation under farm conditions. Over a 3-year period 90 firstcalf cows each took part in the experiment for one lactation, making six groups of 14-16 animals.For the experimental period a fixed basal diet was given of hay, concentrates, and wet brewer's grains. One group received only the basal ration. Four groups received in addition a fixed concentrates supplement for 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks from calving onwards respectively. The sixth group also had supplementary concentrates for 16 weeks but for weeks 5-12 inclusive the amount was doubled so that this group's diet simulated broadly ad libitum feeding in early lactation.Milk yield was increased by extra concentrates. The greater part of the effect was apparent in the first 2 weeks of different levels of intake, with a further build-up over the next 6-8 weeks. The size of the response fell as time from calving to initiation of different intakes increased. Additional food increased and delayed peak yield level. Persistency of milk yield was not affected by fixed differences in intake. Rate of liveweight change was improved by extra concentrates, less so in the third compared with the first month on treatment.A higher level of feeding in early lactation led to a greater partition of nutrients in mid-lactation to milk at the expense of gains in body reserves. This advantage to milk production extended to the end of lactation. In it the greatest response per unit concentrates was obtained from supplementation in the first 4 weeks of lactation but the total effect was increased by giving a double allowance of concentrates, and by extending the period of extra feeding to 8 weeks after calving.Solids-not-fat content and yield, and fat yield but not fat content, showed a similar response pattern to milk yield.Animal-to-animal variation in output on constant diets was characterized by negative regressions of live-weight change on milk yield. The regression coefficients were greater in early than in mid-lactation but they were constant in size at any one time for the various groups. A change in ration induced a change in output of the individual in which that production pathway favoured naturally by the animal was the more affected.

SUMMARYEighty Friesian heifers were used to study the effect on milk production of two fixed levels of intake at two stages of the lactation. The rations were estimated to contain 7·9 and 6·2 kg starch equivalent per day, with adequate protein content. The heifers were allocated at random to these two levels of intake for weeks 1·9 of lactation and re-allocated at random to them for weeks 10–18 of lactation. Apart from minor variation the heifers were all fed alike for the remainder of the lactation.The higher level of feeding increased yields of milk and milk solids and solids-not-fat content in each period but had a smaller effect in mid- than in early lactation, a trend which was shown to continue further into later lactation. It also conserved body reserves.There was a residual effect in weeks 10–18 from the level of feeding in weeks 1–9 of lactation. This was directly additive to the effects of the current level of feeding. Those animals which had received the higher level of feeding in weeks 1–9 yielded more milk of higher solids-not-fat content than those which had had the lower level of feeding in weeks 1–9. The former group gained less live weight. The effect on milk production over the full lactation from additional feeding in early lactation was three times that observed in early lactation itself. Additional feeding in mid-lactation did not have a residual effect.The absolute output of milk per unit of food over the 18-week period was greatest for that group which had received the lower level of feeding throughout, followed by the group which received the higher level of feeding in weeks 1–9 only. This superiority was achieved at the expense of body reserves. There was a negative regression of live-weight change on milk production.Estimated intakes of metabolizable energy agreed closely with requirements for milk production as indicated by the Agricultural Research Council (1965).

Seventy-six first-calf cows (heifers), 32 second-calf cows and 39 adult cows participated in a trial in which three diets composed of 60:40, 75:25, 90:10 proportions of compound to hay (hay dry-matter digestibility 0-6) were given for the first 36 weeks of lactation in amounts to provide daily an estimated 125, 156 MJ and ad libitum digestible energy (DE) for heifers, and 156, 187 MJ and ad libitum DE for the other parities. The ad libitum intakes were 150 and 200 MJ DE daily for heifers and for older cows respectively.Greater compound content of the diet and larger daily allowance of DE were associated with increased occurrence of mastitis and lameness but not digestive upsets. Dry-matter (D.M.) digestibility was increased with a greater proportion of compound in the diet but was not affected by the amount consumed or stage of lactation.Milk yield and live-weight change were increased linearly and additively by a greater intake of digestible dry matter and by a greater proportion of compound in the diet, throughout the lactation save for no effect of diet composition on live-weight change in early lactation. On equal feed intakes older cows gave more milk and lost more live weight than heifers in early lactation but not thereafter; responses to additional feed were equal for all parities studied.Milk fat concentration was reduced both by increased allowance and by the high compound diet. Milk solids-not-fat (SNF) concentration was not affected by the treatments. Yield of milk fat was not affected by amount eaten and was reduced by the 90:10 diet. Yields of SNF and milk energy were increased by amount eaten and by increased compound in the diet.Thirty-two primiparous cows continued on their experimental treatments without interruption to the end of the second lactation. In the second lactation the effects on yields of milk, milk energy, and SNF were magnified indicating a cumulative effect from lactation to lactation. Little cumulative effect was observed on either milk fat yield, or concentrations of fat and SNF in milk. More generous feeding was associated with reduced milk output/unit D.M. consumed in the first but not the second lactation. More generous feeding improved live-weight change less in the second than in the first lactation. No cumulative effects over two lactations were observed consequent upon variation in diet composition. INTRODUCTIONt a^e ' s u s u a^y achieved by increments of compound feeds/day, which simultaneously alters the diet Financial and physical constraints frequently composition); secondly the influence of parity of limit the size and scope of nutritional research on cow on performance; and thirdly the significance dairy cows, in the present context with regard to of the full lactation rather than a portion thereof input-output relationships, specifically plane of as the production period studied. Additionally, the nutrition. In consequence a large number of key rationing of cows according to individual current questionsremainunanswered.Amongstthesemaybe performance is being challe...