Abstract. Multiple modalities present potential difficulties for kernel-based pattern recognition in consequence of the lack of inter-modal kernel measures. This is particularly apparent when training sets for the differing modalities are disjoint. Thus, while it is always possible to consider the problem at the classifier fusion level, it is conceptually preferable to approach the matter from a kernel-based perspective. By interpreting the aggregate of disjoint training sets as an entire data set with missing inter-modality measurements to be filled in by appropriately chosen substitutes, we arrive at a novel kernel-based technique, the neutral-point method. On further theoretical analysis, it transpires that the method is, in structural terms, a kernel-based analog of the well-known sum rule combination scheme. We therefore expect the method to exhibit similar error-canceling behavior, and thus constitute a robust and conservative strategy for the treatment of kernel-based multi-modal data.
Multi-modal pattern recognition must frequently truncate the set of initially available modalities. When a kernel-based approach is adopted within each modality, the problem of modality selection becomes mathematically analogous to that of wrapper-based feature selection. In this paper, we revise two implicitly wrapperbased methods of SVM-embedded selective kernel combination, the Relevance and Support Kernel Machines, so as to equip them with the ability to preset the desired level of feature-selectivity. Hence, a continuous axis of nested feature selection models is obtained, ranging from the absence of selectivity to the selection of single features. We thus unite the distinct processes of selection and classification within the two techniques in manner suitable for general application within Kernelbased multi-modal pattern recognition.
Abstract. We consider the problem of multi-modal pattern recognition under the assumption that a kernel-based approach is applicable within each particular modality. The Cartesian product of the linear spaces into which the respective kernels embed the output scales of single sensors is employed as an appropriate joint scale corresponding to the idea of combining modalities at the sensor level. This contrasts with the commonly adopted method of combining classifiers inferred from each specific modality. However, a significant risk in combining linear spaces is that of overfitting. To address this, we set out a stochastic method for encompassing modal-selectivity that is intrinsic to (that is to say, theoretically contiguous with) the selected kernel-based pattern-recognition approach. The principle of kernel selectivity supervision is then applied to the problem of signature verification by fusing several on-line and off-line kernels into a complete training and verification technique.
In multimodal biometric information fusion, it is common to encounter missing modalities in which matching cannot be performed. As a result, at the match score level, this implies that scores will be missing. We address the multimodal fusion problem involving missing modalities (scores) using support vector machines with the Neutral Point Substitution (NPS) method. The approach starts by processing each modality using a kernel. When a modality is missing, at the kernel level, the missing modality is substituted by one that is unbiased with regards to the classification, called a neutral point. Critically, unlike conventional missing-data substitution methods, explicit calculation of neutral points may be omitted by virtue of their implicit incorporation within the SVM training framework. Experiments based on the publicly available Biosecure DS2 multimodal (scores) data set shows that the SVM-NPS approach achieves very good generalization performance compared to the sum rule fusion, especially with severe missing modalities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.