Multiple Classifier Systems
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72523-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Pattern Recognition Modalities at the Sensor Level Via Kernel Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the training criterion for Relevance Kernel Machine (RKM) [4,5] is set out in (6). The feature selectivity of this SVM generalisation is parametrically determined by µ : 0 ≤ µ < ∞.…”
Section: The Continuous Training Technique With Supervised Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, the training criterion for Relevance Kernel Machine (RKM) [4,5] is set out in (6). The feature selectivity of this SVM generalisation is parametrically determined by µ : 0 ≤ µ < ∞.…”
Section: The Continuous Training Technique With Supervised Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of discriminative classifiers known as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) may thus be employed for two-class pattern recognition within R n , once modalities are combined via the joint kernel K(x ′ , x ′′ ) = n i=1 x ′ i x ′′ i (this approach can also be used for highly-complex kernel-represented modalities [3][4][5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fusion may be performed at the early or late stage. In the former case of early fusion [1,2], the growing overall dimensionality of the object representation with increasing the number of modalities can be reduced by incorporating some form of modalityselection within the final classification procedure [3,4], thereby eliminating the danger of over-fitting. Such modality-selectivity is correlated with the generalization performance of the training process, so that, if performed ideally, the recognition system user is free to include object-representation modalities without constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such algorithm is given in [2] under the assumption that a kernel-based methodology is utilized to obtain a recognition rule for each particular modality, for which a discriminant hyperplane is specified in the linear space associated with each modality. In this case, the kernel trick [11,12] transforms the problem of combining diverse modalities with missing data into that of appropriately treating blanks in the modality-specific kernel matrices when fusing them into a unified matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%