One of the main goals when treating spasticity is to relieve pain and improve function. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has gained widespread acceptance in the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy. Several studies have clearly shown the short-term functional benefit of BTX-A treatment. Information is limited, however, on the efficacy of medium and long-term regimens, using repeated injection of BTX-A. The aim of the present open-label, prospective study was to evaluate functional outcome in children with spastic cerebral palsy after 1 year of treatment with BTX-A, using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) as a validated outcome measure. Patients (n=25, age 1.5--15.5 years) were treated with BTX-A for adductor spasm (n=12) or pes equinus (n=13). The local effect was evaluated using passive range of motion and modified Ashworth Scale. Apart from a significant improvement in joint mobility and reduction of spasticity compared to pretreatment values (P < 0.01), we demonstrated a significant improvement of gross motor function after 12 months of treatment, with a median gain of 6% in total and goal scores (P < 0.001). An increase in GMFM scores was particularly evident in younger and moderately impaired children (Gross Motor Function Classification System level III). Whether the observed improvement in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy is specifically related to therapy with BTX-A or represents at least in part the natural course of motor development still needs clarification.

Intramuscular injection of botulinum neurotoxin A is a relatively new method for treating spastic movement disorders in children. One major goal of any therapy for patients with movement disorders is to improve gross motor function. In this study, 18 patients with adductor spasm were treated with botulinum neurotoxin A. Treatment effect was determined with the Gross Motor Function Measure, a standardized, validated instrument designed to assist in assessment of gross motor function. Spastic muscle hyperactivity and joint mobility were evaluated by the modified Ashworth Scale and by range of motion, respectively. Compared to pretreatment values, significant improvement in gross motor function (P < .010), decrease in the modified Ashworth Scale, and increase in the range of motion (P < .010) were achieved. Patients with moderate impairment of gross motor function (classed at level III and level IV in the Gross Motor Function Classification System) benefited most from treatment. In patients with severe handicap (level V), only one of five treated patients showed improvement in gross motor function. Nevertheless, all patients in this subgroup benefited from improved ease in hygienic care. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that for most children with moderate functional impairment, the Gross Motor Function Measure is a useful instrument for objective documentation of improvements of gross motor function following treatment with botulinum neurotoxin A.

We demonstrate convincing evidence of responsiveness and validity to support the use of both Gross Motor Function Measure versions as evaluative measures of gross motor function in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury.

No abstract

No abstract