BackgroundAbsconding from hospital is a significant health and security issue within psychiatric facilities that can have considerable adverse effects on patients, their family members and care providers, as well as the wider community. Several studies have documented correlates associated with absconding events among general psychiatric samples; however, few studies have examined this phenomenon within samples of forensic patients where the perception of threat to public safety in the event of an unauthorized absence from hospital is often higher.MethodsWe investigate the frequency, timing, and determinants of absconding events among a sample of forensic psychiatric patients over a 24-month period, and compare patients who abscond to a control group matched along several sociodemographic and clinical dimensions. We explore, in a qualitative manner, patients’ motives for absconding.ResultsFifty-seven patients were responsible for 102 incidents of absconding during the two year study window. Forensic patients who absconded from hospital were more likely to have a history of absconding attempts, a diagnosed substance use disorder, as well as score higher on a structured professional violence risk assessment measure. Only one of the absconding events identified included an incident of minor violence, and very few included the commission of other illegal behaviors (with the exception of substance use). The most common reported motive for absconding was a sense of boredom or frustration.ConclusionsUsing an inclusive definition of absconding, we found that absconding events were generally of brief duration, and that no member of the public was harmed by patients who absconded. Findings surrounding the motivations of absconders suggest that improvements in therapeutic communication between patients and clinical teams could help to reduce the occurrence of absconding events.

BackgroundFew studies have investigated absconding from forensic hospitals and there are no published studies of interventions aimed at reducing these incidents in forensic settings. We present a study of the impact of a new policy using structured professional judgment and an interdisciplinary team-based approach to granting privileges to forensic patients. We assess the impact of this policy on the rate and type of absconding from a metropolitan forensic facility.MethodsFollowing concern about the rate of absconding at our hospital, a new policy was implemented to guide the process of granting hospital grounds and community access privileges. Employing an A-B design, we investigated the rate, characteristics, and motivations of absconding events in the 18 months prior to, and 18 months following, implementation of this policy to assess its effectiveness.ResultsEighty-six patients were responsible for 188 incidents of absconding during the 42-month study window. The rate of absconding decreased progressively from 17.8% of all patients at risk prior to implementation of the new policy, to 13.8% during implementation, and further to 12.0% following implementation. There was a differential impact of the policy on absconding events, in that the greatest reduction was witnessed in absconsions occurring from unaccompanied passes; this was offset, to some extent, by an increase in absconding occurring from within hospital units or from staff accompanied outings. Seven of the absconding events included incidents of minor violence, and two included the commission of other illegal behaviors. The most common reported motive for absconding across the time periods studied was a sense of boredom or frustration. Discharge rate from hospital was 22.9% prior to the implementation of the policy to 22.7% after its introduction, indicating no change in the rate of patients’ eventual community reintegration.ConclusionsA structured and team-based approach to decision making regarding hospital grounds and community access privileges appeared to reduce the overall rate of absconding without slowing community reintegration of forensic patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0474-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The assessment and management of risk for future violence is a core requirement of mental health professionals in many settings. Despite an increasing need for violence risk assessments across diverse contexts, little is known regarding the ecological validity of many widely used risk assessment schemes or the level of reliability with which actual practicing clinicians score these instruments. The current study investigated the interrater reliability of the Historical, Clinical, and Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), a widely used structured professional tool to assess violence risk, among 21 practicing clinicians in a forensic psychiatric program in Ontario, Canada. Results suggest that clinicians with varying professional training backgrounds and experience were able to rate the HCR-20 with good to excellent levels of reliability across three patients who varied in risk level. Consistent with studies investigating rater reliability for research purposes, we found that the risk management scale of the HCR-20 was the most challenging for clinicians to rate reliably. Importantly, results from generalizability theory analyses revealed that less than 3% of the variance in HCR-20 total scores and summary risk ratings is attributable to rater effects, whereas the majority of variance is attributable to differences among patients.

A set of experiments on immediate probed recognition of digit triples is reported in which the variables were list length (five, six, seven, or eight triples), the probability that a probe was old (.33, .5, or .67), and whether the digit triples were presented with an auditory component or articulatory suppression. Previous work had suggested that the false alarm (FA) rate in this paradigm was lower when auditory information was available than when it was not; this observation had led to the development of the partial matching theory of immediate probed recognition, according to which FAs could arise not only as a result of unlucky guesses but also when new probes shared a first digit in common with a partially retained target triple. It was argued that partial memory representations were less likely following auditory presentation than following articulatory suppression, Partial matching theory is contrasted with the rational response theory, according to which all FAs are unlucky guesses; partial matching theory gave a better account of the present experimental data than did rational response theory. However, a logical relationship between the two theories was suggested, a consequence of which was that rational response theory could be modified to include partial matching in such a way as to account for mirror effects, not only in unusually difficult immediate probed recognition tasks, but also in the more commonly studied mixed test list paradigm involving words of high or low frequency.These six experiments were first described in honours theses by 1.B" S.c., N.C., K.O., TT, and TW. They were supervised by D.1.M. in the academic year 1994-95. Diane E. Birch assisted substantially in the development of the computer program, originally designed by Lorraine Farrell, that controlled the presentation of the targets and probes and summarized the subjects' responses in terms of hit rates, false alarm rates, and other summary statistics. N.C. adapted Birch's computer program so that the probability ofan old probe could be independently manipulated and was also responsible for suggesting how the degree of partial matching between new probes and targets might best be calculated. TT initiated the move to try to estimate false alarm rates on the basis ofpartial matches between retained elements and elements of new probes. S.c. corrected an earlier error made in the development ofrationa I response theory. Sylvia Hains carried out all the analyses of'variance and calculations of d L , P" C L , B" and standard errors using the Queen's University mainframe computer, The personal computers used in these experiments were also provided by Queen's University. Maureen Freedman and Rachel Murray typed the manuscript, B.F. aided substantially in drafting the manuscript and in reanalyzing data collected earlier, Rob Ellis taught us how to use spreadsheets provided by Microsoft Excel, and Monica Hurt did the illustrations. Some ofthe expenses of manuscript preparation were borne by a research grant from the Social Sciences and Hum...

Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents major challenges to places of detention, including secure forensic hospitals. International guidance presents a range of approaches to assist in decreasing the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks as well as responses to manage outbreaks of infection should they occur. Methods: We conducted a literature search on pandemic or outbreak management in forensic mental health settings, including gray literature sources, from 2000 to April 2020. We describe the evolution of a COVID-19 outbreak in our own facility, and the design, and staffing of a forensic isolation unit. Results: We found a range of useful guidance but no published experience of implementing these approaches. We experienced outbreaks of COVID-19 on two secure forensic units with 13 patients and 10 staff becoming positive. One patient died. The outbreaks lasted for 41 days on each unit from declaration to resolution. We describe the approaches taken to reduction of infection risk, social distancing and changes to the care delivery model. Conclusions: Forensic secure settings present major challenges as some proposals for pandemic management such as decarceration or early release are not possible, and facilities may present challenges to achieve sustained social distancing. Assertive testing, cohorting, and isolation units are appropriate responses to these challenges.

No abstract

Background: The risk and recovery paradigms are the dominant frameworks informing forensic mental health services and have been the focus of increasing research interest. Despite this, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the nature of mental health recovery in forensic settings (i.e., 'secure recovery'), and specifically, the key elements of recovery as perceived by forensic patients and their treatment providers. Importantly, we know little about how patients perceive the forensic mental health system, to what extent they see it as fair and legitimate, and how these perceptions impact upon treatment engagement, risk for adversity, and progress in recovery. Methods: In this prospective, mixed-methods study, we investigate patient perceptions of procedural justice and coercion within the context of the forensic mental health system in Ontario, Canada (final N = 120 forensic patients and their primary care providers). We elicit patient self-assessments of risk and progress in recovery, and assess the degree of concordance with clinician-rated estimates of these constructs. Both qualitative and quantitative methods are used to assess the degree to which patient perceptions of coercion, fairness and legitimacy impact upon their level of treatment engagement, risk for adversity and progress in recovery. A prospective, two-year follow-up will investigate the impact of patient and clinician perspectives on outcomes in the domains of forensic hospital readmission, criminal reoffending, and rate of progress through the forensic system. Discussion: Results from this mixed-methods study will yield a rich and detailed account of patient perceptions of the forensic mental health system, and specifically whether perceptions of procedural fairness, justice and legitimacy, as well as perceived coercion, systematically influence patients' risk for adversity, their ability to progress in their recovery, and ultimately, advance through the forensic system towards successful community living. Findings will provide conceptual clarity to the key elements of secure recovery, and

Summary This article describes the development and implementation of wellness initiatives within a large Canadian academic mental health hospital, based on the Mental Health Commission of Canada’s workplace standards for mental health. To support the implementation of an organizational framework for physician wellness, a needs assessment of Centre for Addiction and Mental Health physicians (N = 181) was conducted between 21 November and 5 December 2017, including measuring physician burnout rates using two items on the Maslach Burnout Inventory tool. Based on findings, and the organizational wellness framework, a multi-pronged wellness approach was developed, improving physician supports at the individual, team and organizational levels. Eighty-four survey responses (46% response rate) were gathered across eight clinical divisions, with 59% of respondents stating that they were negatively impacted by emotionally stressful events at work within the past year. Themes emerging from open-ended questions included the importance of a culture of safety and wellbeing, leadership accountability and availability of formal supports and processes. In response to survey findings, and our organizational framework, the following six initiatives were implemented: (i) a peer support program, (ii) an office of professionalism, (iii) individual and group mentorship opportunities, (iv) communities of practice, (v) enhanced training and leadership development opportunities, and (vi) efforts to optimize use of electronic health records to enhance efficiency of practice. It is possible to implement a multifaceted organizational approach to physician wellness, engaging physicians and continuously adapting in response to physician input. Future robust evaluation of these strategies can inform organizational roadmaps to improve physician wellness.