Aims To assess the proportion of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are eligible for sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) based on the European Medicines Agency/Food and Drug Administration (EMA/FDA) label, the PARADIGM‐HF trial and the 2016 ESC guidelines, and the association between eligibility and outcomes. Methods and results Outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC‐EORP‐HFA Long‐Term Heart Failure (HF‐LT) Registry between March 2011 and November 2013 were considered. Criteria for LCZ696 based on EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM‐HF and ESC guidelines were applied. Of 5443 patients, 2197 and 2373 had complete information for trial and guideline eligibility assessment, and 84%, 12% and 12% met EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM‐HF and guideline criteria, respectively. Absent PARADIGM‐HF criteria were low natriuretic peptides (21%), hyperkalemia (4%), hypotension (7%) and sub‐optimal pharmacotherapy (74%); absent Guidelines criteria were LVEF>35% (23%), insufficient NP levels (30%) and sub‐optimal pharmacotherapy (82%); absent label criteria were absence of symptoms (New York Heart Association class I). When a daily requirement of ACEi/ARB ≥ 10 mg enalapril (instead of ≥ 20 mg) was used, eligibility rose from 12% to 28% based on both PARADIGM‐HF and guidelines. One‐year heart failure hospitalization was higher (12% and 17% vs. 12%) and all‐cause mortality lower (5.3% and 6.5% vs. 7.7%) in registry eligible patients compared to the enalapril arm of PARADIGM‐HF. Conclusions Among outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC‐EORP‐HFA HF‐LT Registry, 84% met label criteria, while only 12% and 28% met PARADIGM‐HF and guideline criteria for LCZ696 if requiring ≥ 20 mg and ≥ 10 mg enalapril, respectively. Registry patients eligible for LCZ696 had greater heart failure hospitalization but lower mortality rates than the PARADIGM‐HF enalapril group.

EAS index assessed by TDI may be helpful in predicting the risk of rehospitalizations in subjects with CHF. EAS index may represent an independent adjunctive tool for the risk stratification of patients with CHF in addition to 'traditional' tools such as LVEF or MPI.

BackgroundFew works have evaluated the effect of statins on left ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), by using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). We therefore aimed to investigate whether atorvastatin treatment may influence prognosis and myocardial performance evaluated by TDI in subjects with CHF.MethodsFive hundred thirty-two consecutive CHF outpatients enrolled in a local registry, the Daunia Heart Failure Registry, were prospectively analysed. 195 patients with CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40 %, either in treatment with atorvastatin (N: 114) or without statins (N: 81), underwent TDI examination. Adverse events were evaluated during follow-up.ResultsThe atorvastatin group showed a lower incidence of adverse events (cardiac death: 0 % vs 7 %, p < 0.01), and better TDI performance (E/E’ 15 ± 5.7 vs 18 ± 8.3, p < 001) than controls. Ischaemic CHF patients in treatment with atorvastatin also showed a lower incidence of adverse events (death: 10 % vs 26 %, p < 0.05; sustained ventricular arrhythmias: 5 % vs 19 %, p < 0.05, cardiac death: 0 vs 8 %, p < 0.05) and better TDI performance (E/E’ ratio: 15.00 ± 5.68 vs 19.72 ± 9.14, p < 0.01; St: 353.70 ± 48.96 vs 303.33 ± 68.52 msec, p < 0.01) than controls. The association between atorvastatin and lower rates of cardiac death remained statistically significant even after correction in a multivariable analysis (RR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.71–0.96, p < 0.05 in CHF with LVEF ≤40 %; RR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.62–0.95, p < 0.05 in ischaemic CHF with LVEF ≤40 %).ConclusionsTreatment with atorvastatin in outpatients with systolic CHF is associated with fewer cardiac deaths, and a better left ventricular performance, as assessed by TDI.

We report the case of a 75-year-old man, referred for worsening dyspnea and fever. The electrocardiography (ECG) showed mild ST-elevation in anterior leads, while cardiac echography severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with apical ballooning. Later on, ECG showed negative T-waves and QT-prolongation in the same anterior leads and T-waves positivization during fever peak. Ten days later, LV ejection fraction completely recovered, apical ballooning and fever disappeared. We, therefore, hypothesize that transient apical ballooning found in our patient may have been induced by a respiratory infection, not detectable at seriate blood cultures.

CPX provides prognostic independent information for risk of SVA in subjects with CHF.