The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

No abstract

The importance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in ABO-compatible liver transplantation is controversial. Here we report a prospective series of liver recipients with a preoperative positive crossmatch. To establish the diagnosis of AMR in liver recipients, the criteria described for kidney allografts were adopted. In approximately 10% of 197 liver transplants, we observed a positive T and B cell flow crossmatch before transplantation. Fifteen of 19 patients converted to negative crossmatches early after transplantation and displayed normal liver function while they were on routine immunosuppression. Four patients maintained positive crossmatches. Three of the 4 met the criteria for AMR and showed evidence of graft dysfunction, the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), morphological tissue destruction with positive C4d linear staining on the graft sinusoidal endothelium, and improved function with attempts to eliminate DSAs. A persistently positive crossmatch after liver transplantation may lead to early, severe AMR and liver failure. C4d staining in the liver sinusoidal endothelium should alert one to the possibility of AMR. In our experience, patients with a positive crossmatch should have it repeated at 2 weeks and, if it is positive, again at 3 to 5 weeks. Recipients with an unknown preoperative crossmatch who develop early cholestasis of unclear etiology should be crossmatched or tested for the presence of DSAs to evaluate for AMR. Liver

This conditioning regimen prevented hyperacute rejection but was ineffective in preventing the return of Ab, which was associated with the development of acute humoral rejection with features of coagulopathy. No baboon developed anti-pig Ab other than alphaGal Ab. Further modifications of the protocol directed toward suppression of production of Ab are required to successfully induce tolerance to pig organs in baboons.

Both PCTx and POTx lead to profound alterations in hemostasis and coagulation parameters that must be overcome if discordant xenotransplantation of hematopoietic cells and organs is to be fully successful. Disordered thromboregulation could exacerbate vascular damage and potentiate activation of coagulation pathways after exposure to xenogeneic cells or a vascularized xenograft.

Both methods reduced the level of anti-pig IgM and IgG xenoreactive antibodies to nearly background, but column perfusion caused less hypotension and reduction in platelets than liver perfusion. Four pig kidneys transplanted into monkeys after column perfusion did not undergo hyperacute rejection, remaining functional for 2-10 days, with a mean functional period of 7 days, demonstrating that a pig kidney can support renal function in a primate.

HE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WAIT-ing for a kidney transplant continues to grow at an alarming pace 1 and any significant gains in closing the gap between organ supply and demand are likely to come from the increased use of live donors. The 2 most significant barriers to greater use of live donors are blood type incom-For editorial comment see p 1691.

Systemic coagulation disturbances are associated with delayed xenograft rejection.