The clinical and pathologic features of 51 cases of pilomatrixoma found in our archives from 1990-1999 were reviewed, with emphasis on the cytopathologic features of the 22 cases that were sampled by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy prior to excision. Although uncommon, almost 20% of the pilomatrixomas in this series occurred in adults over age 30. Of the commonly reported features, the presence of basaloid cells and ghost cells in FNA smears, associated with a cutaneous location of the lesion, was sufficient for a confident cytologic diagnosis of pilomatrixoma. The presence of foreign body-type giant cells, nucleated squamous cells, and calcification, alone or in combination, was less specific, but supported a diagnosis of pilomatrixoma. Although infrequently reported, prominent nucleoli in basaloid cells and smears containing refractile keratin clumps were very useful clues in the diagnosis of pilomatrixoma. Finally, the routine use of cell blocks is recommended because in many of the cases presented ghost cells were fragmented or obscured in smears, but were more readily identified in cell block sections.

Four experienced cytopathologists provided consultations using telecytology and routine microscopy. Twenty-seven fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) from patients with chronic pancreatitis with atypical epithelial repair changes (n = 9) and pancreatic low-grade adenocarcinomas (LG-AC) (n = 18) were studied. False-positive and false-negative diagnostic rates were 19.4% and 12.5% by microscopy and 11.1% and 2.8% by telecytology. Comparisons of agreements between the correct diagnoses and consultations rendered by the two methods and among the diagnoses rendered on the same cases by the two modalities yielded kappa coefficients ranging from 0.444-1.000. Telecytology yielded slightly better kappa coefficients than microscopy. This method, which to our knowledge has not been previously applied to pancreatic FNAB, provides a potentially useful consultative tool for the interpretation of these difficult specimens. The diagnosis of FNAB from patients with chronic pancreatitis and LG-AC is difficult even for experienced consultants, as underscored by the considerable intraobserver and interobserver variability encountered in this study.

No abstract

With the advent of modern therapy, the differences in prognoses and treatment regimens among different subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have largely vanished. Stage and the presence of systemic symptoms are much more important than histologic subtypes as predictive factors. The current (2001) WHO classification markedly de-emphasizes spatial relationships as critical to the diagnosis of lymphoma and emphasizes cell morphology, immunophenotype, genetic features, and clinical information to define the disease states. This classification, thus, greatly enhances the capability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to accurately diagnose HL. We searched all the FNA cases in our institute in years 1999 through 2004 and found 42 cases, for which 13 were primarily diagnosed (31.0%), 2 were recurrent (4.8%), 5 were highly suspicious (11.9%), and 22 were suspicious (52.3%) for HL. On follow-up tissue biopsy, all the primarily diagnosed, recurrent, and highly suspicious cases were confirmed to be HL (100% agreement). For the 22 suspicious cases, 13 were HL (59.1%), 5 were other lymphomas (22.8%), 1 was lymphoma unclassifiable (4.5%), and 3 were reactive processes (13.6%). The effect of immunostains on the diagnosis of HL was examined, and its importance was emphasized. Analysis of demographic data and the distribution of HL subtypes demonstrate that the study sample is representative of the general HL patient population. On the basis of these results, we propose: (1) If the FNA diagnosis of HL is confirmed both by morphology and immunostains, no further tissue confirmation, subclassification and grading is necessary, and appropriate treatment regimens should follow. (2) The nodular lymphocyte predominant HL and classical HL can be differentiated by adequate immunostaining. (3) If a definitive diagnosis cannot be achieved by FNA, a second FNA or a tissue biopsy should be recommended.