The aim was to compare X-ray and ultrasound (US) in diagnosing gout. In a prospective study, 105 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of gout underwent conventional X-ray und high-resolution US in order to help in arriving at a definite diagnosis. X-ray findings suggestive of gout included soft-tissue opacifications with densities between soft tissue and bone, articular and periarticular bone erosions, and osteophytes at the margins of opacifications or erosions. US findings suggestive of gout included bright stippled foci and hyperechoic soft-tissue areas. Fifty-five patients had a definite diagnosis of gout (102 involved sites), 31 patients were diagnosed as having another disease (59 involved sites), and 19 patients were excluded from the study because a definite diagnosis could not be established. X-ray suggested gout with a sensitivity of 31% (32/102) and a specificity of 93% (55/59), whereas US suggested gout with a sensitivity of 96% (98/102) and a specificity of 73% (43/59). US was much more sensitive than conventional X-ray but less specific. Our data show that US often provided additional diagnostic information in patients with clinical suspicion of gout when laboratory findings and X-ray results were negative or inconclusive and should therefore be used in these cases.

No abstract

In many clinical conditions, high-resolution sonography and color (power) Doppler sonography can be used as the first-line modality for evaluating cervical soft tissue masses. Cervical cysts, lipomas, paragangliomas, neurogenic tumors, hemangiomas, and lymphangiomas often exhibit characteristic sonographic appearances. Sonography can be used for lymph node assessment, and most salivary gland diseases can be diagnosed sonographically. Sonography can be used to guide needle biopsy of soft tissue neoplasms and lymph nodes. In addition, the relationship between a cervical mass and the great vessels can be evaluated.

In centers with access to high‐end ultrasound machines and expert sonologists, ultrasound is used to detect metastases in regional lymph nodes from melanoma, breast cancer and vulvar cancer. There is, as yet, no international consensus on ultrasound assessment of lymph nodes in any disease or medical condition. The lack of standardized ultrasound nomenclature to describe lymph nodes makes it difficult to compare results from different ultrasound studies and to find reliable ultrasound features for distinguishing non‐infiltrated lymph nodes from lymph nodes infiltrated by cancer or lymphoma cells. The Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) collaborative group consists of gynecologists, gynecologic oncologists and radiologists with expertise in gynecologic cancer, particularly in the ultrasound staging and treatment of vulvar cancer. The work herein is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements which may be used to describe inguinal lymph nodes on grayscale and color/power Doppler ultrasound. The proposed nomenclature need not be limited to the description of inguinal lymph nodes as part of vulvar cancer staging; it can be used to describe peripheral lymph nodes in general, as well as non‐peripheral (i.e. parietal or visceral) lymph nodes if these can be visualized clearly. The association between the ultrasound features described here and histopathological diagnosis has not yet been established. VITA terms and definitions lay the foundations for prospective studies aiming to identify ultrasound features typical of metastases and other pathology in lymph nodes and studies to elucidate the role of ultrasound in staging of vulvar and other malignancies. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm or more as a sign of acute appendicitis provides high sensitivity but limited specificity. This diagnostic criterion is more useful in excluding acute appendicitis than in confirming it.

No abstract

There are several US signs associated with adult celiac disease. None of the signs identified is specific, but a combination of signs is characteristic and indicates suspicion of this disease in a high percentage of cases. US could help to avoid diagnostic delay, especially in patients who have atypical clinical presentations.

Acute bowel inflammation frequently originates from thin-walled diverticula of the colon. Not the presence of diverticula, but the demonstration of an inflamed diverticulum, is diagnostic of diverticulitis in cases of bowel wall thickening and pericolic inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the sonographic appearance and detectability of inflamed diverticula. One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with clinically suspected diverticulitis underwent sonographic examination. Outpouchings from the colonic wall centred in the pericolic inflammation were considered inflamed diverticula. Depending on the sonographic appearance they were divided into four groups: hypoechoic; predominantly hyperechoic; hyperechoic with surrounding hypoechoic rim; and hyperechoic with acoustic shadowing. Sonography showed inflamed diverticula in 79 (77%) of 102 patients with diverticulitis. Inflamed diverticula were hypoechoic in 37%, predominantly hyperechoic in 4%, hyperechoic with surrounding hypoechoic rim in 41% and hyperechoic with acoustic shadowing in 18% of patients. In 23 (23%) of 102 patients no inflamed diverticulum was demonstrable. This group included 17 patients with complicated diverticulitis and 6 false-negative cases. An inflamed diverticulum as a sign of diverticulitis yielded an overall sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 99%. Sensitivity in uncomplicated disease was 96%. In patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis an inflamed diverticulum is a sign of diverticulitis with excellent sensitivity and specificity, usually with solitary and less frequently with more than one inflamed diverticulum being demonstrable. In patients with complicated diverticulitis an inflamed diverticulum is often not detectable.