The purpose of this study was to compare various pre-operative methods of estimating intra-operative hamstring autograft size. A retrospective review was completed on 74 patients who had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using a quadruple-looped hamstring autograft from July 2007-April 2015 at a single institution. A positive correlation was observed between intra-operative graft size and pre-operative imaging using two methods of MRI measurements. Correlation existed between hamstring size and patient height and weight, but not age or BMI. Thus, pre-operative MRI and anthropometric measurements can be used to estimate intra-operative hamstring graft size.

Introduction: Hip arthroscopy allows surgeons to address intra-articular pathology of the hip while avoiding more invasive open surgical dislocation. However the post-operative rehabilitation protocols have varied greatly in the literature, with many having prolonged periods of limited motion and weight bearing. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe a criterion-based early weight bearing protocol following hip arthroscopy and investigate functional outcomes in the subjects who were active duty military. Methods: Active duty personnel undergoing hip arthroscopy for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement were prospectively assessed in a controlled environment for the ability to incorporate early postoperative weight-bearing with the following criteria: no increased pain complaint with weight bearing and normalized gait pattern. Modified Harris Hip (HHS) and Hip Outcome score (HOS) were performed preoperatively and at six months post-op. Participants were progressed with a standard hip arthroscopy protocol. Hip flexion was limited to not exceed 90 degrees for the first three weeks post-op, with progression back to running beginning at three months. Final discharge was dependent upon the ability to run two miles at military specified pace and do a single leg broad jump within six inches of the contralateral leg without an increase in pain. Results: Eleven participants met inclusion criteria over the study period. Crutch use was discontinued at an average of five days following surgery based on established weight bearing criteria. Only one participant required continued crutch use at 15 days. Participants' functional outcome was improved postoperatively, as demonstrated by significant increases in HOS and HHS. At the six month follow up, eight of 11 participants were able to take and complete a full Army Physical Fitness Test. Conclusions: Following completion of the early weight bearing rehabilitation protocol, 81% of participants were able to progress to full weight bearing by four days post-operative, with normalized pain-free gait patterns. Active duty personnel utilizing an early weight bearing protocol following hip arthroscopy demonstrated significant functional improvement at six months.

No abstract

No abstract

Background:Fluoroscopic guidance is routinely utilized during hip arthroscopic surgery. Previous studies have shown that the C-arm orientation can significantly affect radiation exposure for both the surgeon and the patient during orthopaedic procedures. However, this has not been previously assessed for hip arthroscopic surgery.Hypothesis:Using an inverted C-arm during hip arthroscopic surgery will reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A simulation study measured scatter radiation during hip arthroscopic surgery performed in the supine position under fluoroscopic guidance with an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom on a radiolucent operating table. Radiation exposure tested 2 different C-arm orientations: standard and inverted. Testing was performed at 6 locations corresponding to the patient, surgeon’s neck, surgeon’s waist, surgical technician, anesthesiologist, and radiology technician. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analyses assessing radiation exposure between the C-arm orientations. A risk calculation for carcinogenesis was performed based on reported radiation dosages.Results:Radiation exposure (in mGy/min) was more than 100-fold higher for the patient compared with the surgeon in both C-arm orientations. The inverted C-arm orientation resulted in a 2.48-fold decrease in patient radiation exposure when compared with the standard orientation (10.8 mGy/min vs 26.8 mGy/min, respectively). There was a small but significant increase in surgeon radiation exposure in the inverted orientation compared with the standard orientation (0.072 vs 0.067 mGy/min, respectively). The patient’s carcinogenesis risk was decreased 2.64-fold with the inverted orientation compared with the standard orientation (1.4 × 10–5 vs 3.7 × 10–5, respectively).Conclusion:The inverted C-arm orientation resulted in a 2.48-fold decrease in patient radiation exposure with a 2.64-fold decrease in the carcinogenesis risk compared with the standard orientation. Inadvertently, the inverted orientation provided a 9-cm increase in the surgeon’s working area. Our data supported the clinical utilization of the inverted C-arm orientation during hip arthroscopic surgery to minimize patient radiation exposure. Although there was a minimal but significant increase in surgeon radiation exposure with the inverted orientation, we believe that this is negligible when incorporated with standard leaded protective equipment as contrasted with the significant dose reduction for the patient as well as the decreased risk of carcinogenesis and hereditary disorders.Clinical Relevance:Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery routinely acquire radiation exposure during the use of the C-arm. Measures to minimize radiation via the inverted C-arm orientation will decrease the unnecessary risk to the patient while continuing to allow for optimal treatment.