Abstract:Introduction: Hip arthroscopy allows surgeons to address intra-articular pathology of the hip while avoiding more invasive open surgical dislocation. However the post-operative rehabilitation protocols have varied greatly in the literature, with many having prolonged periods of limited motion and weight bearing. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe a criterion-based early weight bearing protocol following hip arthroscopy and investigate functional outcomes in the subjects who were active duty mil… Show more
“…Furthermore, Tijssen et al [ 20 ] had a mean follow-up of 26.8 months (range 7.5–45.3) for their patients. Shaw et al [ 21 ] had followed their patients for a 6-month post-operative period, while Bennell et al reported 24-week follow-up and Mansell et al [ 23 ] reported 24-month follow-up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following phases of rehabilitation were set to establish healthy healing of the tissue, reduce pain, restore gait, strength and endurance, regain cardiovascular fitness and proprioception (Saavedra et al [ 19 ] and Mansell et al [ 23 ]) and regain range of motion (ROM) and ability to RTS without pain among the phase-based studies [ 1 , 19–21 , 23 ]. Saavedra et al [ 19 ] and Shaw et al [ 21 ] did not include pre-operative phases. Finally, Shaw et al [ 21 ] designed their protocol to control pain, increase active ROM, normalize gait, restore strength and ability to perform daily living activities, increase agility movements and help patients to return to and pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT).…”
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of structured physical therapy protocols on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following hip arthroscopy. A literature search was completed in October 2019 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify articles reporting specific rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy that document PROs. Studies meeting all inclusion and exclusion were reviewed and data were extracted. Six studies were included in analysis. The mean age was 34.7% and 56.6% were males. Five studies described rehabilitation protocols in phases with specific goals and progression criteria. All studies included range of motion (ROM) and weight-bearing (WB) precautions. Return to sport (RTS)/activity varied between 7 and 32 weeks. The studies used variations of 21 different PROs. Significant improvements in baseline and post-operative PROs noted across studies. Rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy typically consist of 4–5 phase programs with set goals and progression criteria. Several commonalities existed between studies on WB, ROM precautions and gait normalization. However, timing and recommendations for RTS/return to work varied between studies and were dependent on the concomitant procedures performed as well as type of patient population. Clinically significant improvement in PROs from baseline noted in majority of the studies reviewed that involved a structured rehabilitation program following arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. As there is heterogeneity in patient-specific characteristics across the included studies, no determination can be made as to which protocol is most effective and further high-quality comparative studies are needed.
Clinical relevance: Adopting phase-based rehabilitation protocols following arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment help achieve improved outcomes that are predictable
“…Furthermore, Tijssen et al [ 20 ] had a mean follow-up of 26.8 months (range 7.5–45.3) for their patients. Shaw et al [ 21 ] had followed their patients for a 6-month post-operative period, while Bennell et al reported 24-week follow-up and Mansell et al [ 23 ] reported 24-month follow-up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following phases of rehabilitation were set to establish healthy healing of the tissue, reduce pain, restore gait, strength and endurance, regain cardiovascular fitness and proprioception (Saavedra et al [ 19 ] and Mansell et al [ 23 ]) and regain range of motion (ROM) and ability to RTS without pain among the phase-based studies [ 1 , 19–21 , 23 ]. Saavedra et al [ 19 ] and Shaw et al [ 21 ] did not include pre-operative phases. Finally, Shaw et al [ 21 ] designed their protocol to control pain, increase active ROM, normalize gait, restore strength and ability to perform daily living activities, increase agility movements and help patients to return to and pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT).…”
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of structured physical therapy protocols on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following hip arthroscopy. A literature search was completed in October 2019 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify articles reporting specific rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy that document PROs. Studies meeting all inclusion and exclusion were reviewed and data were extracted. Six studies were included in analysis. The mean age was 34.7% and 56.6% were males. Five studies described rehabilitation protocols in phases with specific goals and progression criteria. All studies included range of motion (ROM) and weight-bearing (WB) precautions. Return to sport (RTS)/activity varied between 7 and 32 weeks. The studies used variations of 21 different PROs. Significant improvements in baseline and post-operative PROs noted across studies. Rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy typically consist of 4–5 phase programs with set goals and progression criteria. Several commonalities existed between studies on WB, ROM precautions and gait normalization. However, timing and recommendations for RTS/return to work varied between studies and were dependent on the concomitant procedures performed as well as type of patient population. Clinically significant improvement in PROs from baseline noted in majority of the studies reviewed that involved a structured rehabilitation program following arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. As there is heterogeneity in patient-specific characteristics across the included studies, no determination can be made as to which protocol is most effective and further high-quality comparative studies are needed.
Clinical relevance: Adopting phase-based rehabilitation protocols following arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment help achieve improved outcomes that are predictable
“…Across all pooled data, four studies demonstrated extreme positive effects. Three of these studies [54, 101,120] involved participants undertaking high-level physical activity with elevated post-arthroscopy scores. Conversely, Michal et al [102] reported very low pre-arthroscopy scores in a cohort who underwent surgery for subspinal decompression.…”
Background: Hip arthroscopy is a common surgical intervention for young and middle-aged adults with hiprelated pain and dysfunction, who have high expectations for returning to physical activity following surgery. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the impact of hip arthroscopy on physical activity post-arthroscopy. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken in identifying studies from January 1st 1990 to December 5th 2019. The search included English language articles reporting physical activity as an outcome following hip arthroscopy in adults aged 18-50 years. Quality assessment, data extraction and synthesis of included studies were undertaken. Results: Full text articles (n = 234) were assessed for eligibility following screening of titles and abstracts (n = 2086), yielding 120 studies for inclusion. The majority (86%) of the studies were level 4 evidence. One study reported objective activity data. The most frequently occurring patient-reported outcome measure was the Hip Outcome Score-sport-specific subscale (HOS-SS, 84% of studies). Post--arthroscopy improvement was indicated by large effect sizes for patient-reported outcome measures (standard paired difference [95% confidence interval] −1.35[−1.61 to −1.09] at more than 2 years post-arthroscopy); however, the majority of outcome scores for the HOS-SS did not meet the defined level for a patient-acceptable symptom state. Conclusion: The current level of available information regarding physical activity for post arthroscopy patients is limited in scope. Outcomes have focused on patients' perceived difficulties with sport-related activities with a paucity of information on the type, quality and quantity of activity undertaken. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level 2 through to Level 4 studies
“…Shaw et al recently reported on a series of 11 active-duty military patients who were allowed to fully weight bear as tolerated following hip arthroscopy for FAI. 24 Most of the patients in their cohort underwent osteoplasty and labral repair. They used specific criteria to allow crutch-wean, including a near-normal pain-free gait pattern.…”
The understanding of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has increased over the past 10 years, with advancements in diagnosis and surgical techniques. Controversy remains regarding the ideal regimen of conservative care. Additionally, there is wide variety in postoperative clinical practice after hip arthroscopy. This review is a synthesis of resources on rehabilitation as a stand-alone treatment for FAI as well rehabilitation following surgery. Best evidence regarding conservative care is presented followed by postoperative debates on weight-bearing, range of motion, and physical therapy. In most cases, such as use of bracing and continuous passive motion, there are limited experimental studies to rely on. Higher quality evidence is required to support today's rehabilitation practices which are based mostly on theory and individual experience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.