It is difficult to cure severe open fractures of the lower extremities due to the frequent occurrence of severe damage to soft tissues or blood vessels, as well as bone defects, and concomitant infection, such as osteomyelitis. If appropriate treatment is not performed, long-term complications, such as nonunion of the bone, intractable ulcers, or other disorders, may arise. Between 1993 and 2010, we reviewed the records of 27 patients, and 28 limbs were treated. A total of 31 free-tissue transfers were performed on these 28 limbs. In this study, we classified the degree of damage based on the operative appearance of the condition of the recipient vein. A state that was normal or near-normal was described as type I-normal. A vein that was buried under a scar, but was comparatively easy to detach and retained a moderate adventitia was classified as type II-moderate. A vein with close adhesion between the wall and the scar that was not easy to detach was described as type III-severe. We also examined the relationships between recipient vein type and each of the following: (1) concomitant injury, (2) bone reconstruction, (3) preoperative infection, (4) length of time from injury to reconstruction, (5) eventual reoperation, and (6) flap necrosis. The results showed that there was a statistically significant relationship between recipient vein type and each of the following: bone reconstruction, preoperative infection, eventual reoperation, and flap necrosis. The selection of recipient vein is a factor that greatly affects the outcome of reconstruction of open fractures of the lower extremities. It is important to preoperatively estimate the condition of recipient vein even though it is difficult to preoperatively assess the condition. In some cases, only recipient veins in poor condition can be found intraoperatively on the affected leg. Under such circumstances, a cross-leg flap or a vein graft should be performed without hesitation to use recipient veins in a better condition.
Background:Microtia reconstruction is a challenging procedure, especially in developing nations. The most complex part is learning how to fabricate a framework from costal cartilage. We herein propose a training regimen for ear reconstruction with the use of a plastic eraser.Materials and Methods:The texture of a plastic eraser made from polyvinyl chloride is similar to that of human costal cartilage. The first step of the training is carving out the sixth through eighth rib cartilages from a block of plastic eraser. The second step is a fabrication of the framework from plastic rib cartilages, referring to a template from the intact auricle.Results:As plastic erasers are inexpensive and universally available, inexperienced surgeons can repeatedly perform this framework training. Following several of these training sessions in developing nations, the co-authors and local surgeons successfully performed their microtia reconstructions in a reasonable operative time.Conclusions:This realistic carving model allows surgeons to gain experience before performing an actual ear reconstruction, even in resource-constrained circumstances.
A strong correlation existed between preoperative breast volume, mastectomy-specimen volume, and implant volume. The following formulae were calculated:Mastectomy-specimen volume (mL) = 1.01 × preoperative breast volume (mL) + 9.91Implant volume (mL) = 0.90 × preoperative breast volume (mL) + 65.42Implant volume (mL) = 0.68 × mastectomy-specimen volume (mL) + 68.26This study shows that preoperative breast volume, as measured by a 3D Kinect scanner, can provide useful assistance in the preoperative choice of implant size.
Abstract. We report on a patient with septic arthritis of the knee with Pantoea agglomerans after a penetrating black locust thorn injury. Antibiotics alone or in combination with an arthroscopy may be insufficient for achieving
source control. Accurate medical history and open debridement with a search
for a thorn fragment are key to successful treatment.
Purpose: Haemangiomas and vascular malformations are not easy to differentiate clinically. We describe a patient who was initially thought to have a scrotal venous malformation (VM) but after pathological examination was diagnosed to be afflicted with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with a micro-fistula in pathorogical photo. We think that even if there are suspicions of VM before the operation, the importance of resection with an ample margin of safety is indicated. Material and Method: A 38-year-old man who noticed a mass in his scrotum. The patient was seen at our hospital in May 2009 with concern for progression of the scrotal mass. That mass appeared to indicate a simple case of VM of the scrotum. Result and Conclusion: A biopsy of the mass was performed and was diagnosed to be a micro-fistula AVM, with no tumour growth in the vascular endothelial cells. Resection was performed in September 2009. And there is no recurrence. Even if there are suspicions of VM before the operation, the importance of resection with an ample margin of safety is indicated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.