Difference in nasolabial features between awake and asleep infants with unilateral cleft lip: Anthropometric measurements using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry

Morioka, Daichi; Sato, Nobuhiro; Kusano, Taro; Muramatsu, Hideyuki; Tosa, Yasuyoshi; Ohkubo, Fumio; Yoshimoto, Shinya

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.002

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three-dimensional (3D) photography is already used for various indications in dentistry and cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including esthetical dental rehabilitation of incisors, as a pre-interventional visualization tool to supplement the recorded information, treatment planning and follow-up documentation in orthognathic surgery [5–8]. This sort of mobile or stationary surface imaging is non-invasive and is becoming an additional gold standard tool for documentation and planning, especially in craniofacial surgery [9–12]. Several mobile systems have shown to be a valid and reliable solution with a reasonable cost–benefit ratio alongside the established expensive stationary systems of the last decade due to ongoing technical developments [11, 13, 14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesSimultaneous, radiation-free registration of the teeth and the upper and lower jaw positions in relation to the extraoral soft tissue could improve treatment planning and documentation. The purpose of this study is to describe a workflow to solve this form of registration and surface acquisition with a mobile device.MethodsFacial scans of ten healthy participants were taken using a blue-light LED 3D scanner (Artec® Space Spider; Artec® Group; Luxembourg). An impression of the maxillary dentoalveolar arch was taken simultaneously to the 3D photo using a modified impression tray with two different extraoral registration geometries (sphere vs. cross). Following, an impression of the mandibular dentoalveolar arch was taken once. Both impressions were scanned with the 3D scanner. All resulting standard tesselation language (.stl) files of the geometries were compared to the original, virtual .stl files and the root mean square errors (RMSE) were calculated for each surface (Artec Studio 13 Professional × 64; Artec® Group; Luxembourg) to determine which geometry serves as a better reference for intra-extraoral registration.ResultsThe RMSE between the original geometries and the scanned counterfeits were statistically lower for spherical geometries (p < 0.008). Once scanned and aligned, both geometries enabled an alignment of the intra- and extraoral scan. However, the spherical geometries showed virtually better results without significance (p = 0.70).ConclusionsThe presented study provides a radiation-free solution for simultaneous dentoalveolar correlations in relation to the extraoral soft tissue. Spherical geometries achieved more precise and easier intra-extraoral alignments using the applied mobile 3D scanner and workflow.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Three-dimensional photography represents an alternative method for data capture which addresses the above concerns. Three-dimensional digital technology has been used in the past to study nasolabial anatomy in patients with clefts (Burke and Hughes, 1987; Ras et al, 1995; Oh et al, 2011; Tse et al, 2014; Desmedt et al, 2015; Morioka et al, 2015; Stebel et al, 2016). Three-dimensional nasal changes following NAM in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate has been previously studied using finite element scaling analysis and compared to normal control (Singh et al, 2005; Singh et al, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Nasal Changes After Nasoalveolar Molding and Primary Cheilorhinoplasty in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Mancini

Gibson

Grayson

et al. 2018

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is contrary to how Fisher measures medial lip height 4 and so may account for the difference in range of measurements in this study compared to his. Morioka et al 12 reported a significant 0.3mm difference in the measurement of medial lip height between photographs of the upright awake and supine anaesthetised baby. The difference in lip anthropometrics between the awake and asleep child when comparing 3D photography to direct measurement is noted as one of the challenges in using this modality by Tse et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Philtral Height Discrepancy in Patients with Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lips + /-Palate – Results from a Single Nation Consecutive Cohort

Rivers

Drake

Devlin

et al. 2023

The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The aim of unilateral cleft lip repair is to restore form and function, including symmetrisation of cleft and non-cleft philtral height. Expectation of best outcome is achieved in situations with minimal asymmetry and is assumed occurs most often in incomplete cleft lip only patients. We sought to investigate philtral height discrepancy (PHD) in children with unilateral cleft lip + /-palate from a single nation cohort. Methods Review of prospectively collected PHD measurements taken at time of surgery for all children undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair in Scotland born Jan 2017—December 2020. Data was collected using Microsoft Excel and analysed using embedded statistical software. Results 102 consecutive patients with unilateral lip involvement were identified from the national database. 94 had prospectively documented PHD (92.2%). The majority of patients had an isolated cleft lip (51.1%). Incomplete clefts presented more frequently (52.1%) than complete clefts (47.9%). Mean PHD for the whole cohort was 3.91mm (standard deviation 1.01mm, range 1–6mm). The difference in mean PHD (in-complete versus complete) was 1.1mm (3.4 vs. 4.5, p < 0.001). For lip only versus lip and palate the difference in mean PHD was 1.0mm (3.4 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions This single country consecutive cohort review of PHD in children undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair statistically supports the anecdote that patients with an incomplete cleft lip and isolated cleft lip have lesser asymmetry at presentation. This study presents a consecutive cohort with a greater range of PHD than has previously been reported in the literature.

show abstract

Difference in nasolabial features between awake and asleep infants with unilateral cleft lip: Anthropometric measurements using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry

Cited by 14 publications

References 25 publications

Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking

Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking

Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Nasal Changes After Nasoalveolar Molding and Primary Cheilorhinoplasty in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Philtral Height Discrepancy in Patients with Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lips + /-Palate – Results from a Single Nation Consecutive Cohort

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About