In this study, we examined parents' (n = 260) perceptions of their own and their children's use of social media and other types of communication technologies in the beginning stages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related sanctions (e.g., social distancing) in the United States. We also examined associations between social media and technology use and anxiety. On average, parents reported that both they and their children (especially teenagers aged 13-18) had increased technology and social media use since the beginning of social distancing. Moreover, even after controlling for demographic factors, structural equation models showed that parents and children with higher levels of anxiety (as reported by parents) were more likely to increase their technology use and use social media and phones to connect. Among parents, higher anxiety was related to using social media for both social support and information seeking. Based on these results, we advocate for the utilization of social media by public health officials for collecting, collating, and dispersing accurate crisisrelated information. As social media use is widespread, and there is potential for false rumors to cause erroneous behavioral action and/or undue stress and anxiety, we also suggest that social media campaigns be thoughtfully designed to account for individual differences in developmental stages and psychological vulnerabilities.
Recent advances in small inexpensive sensors, low-power processing, and activity modeling have enabled applications that use on-body sensing and machine learning to infer people's activities throughout everyday life. To address the growing rate of sedentary lifestyles, we have developed a system, UbiFit Garden, which uses these technologies and a personal, mobile display to encourage physical activity. We conducted a 3-week field trial in which 12 participants used the system and report findings focusing on their experiences with the sensing and activity inference. We discuss key implications for systems that use on-body sensing and activity inference to encourage physical activity.
Objectives: Using predictive modeling techniques, we developed and
compared appointment no-show prediction models to better understand appointment
adherence in underserved populations. Methods and Materials: We
collected electronic health record (EHR) data and appointment data including
patient, provider and clinical visit characteristics over a 3-year period. All
patient data came from an urban system of community health centers (CHCs) with
10 facilities. We sought to identify critical variables through logistic
regression, artificial neural network, and naïve Bayes classifier models to
predict missed appointments. We used 10-fold cross-validation to assess the
models’ ability to identify patients missing their appointments.
Results: Following data preprocessing and cleaning, the final
dataset included 73811 unique appointments with 12,392 missed appointments.
Predictors of missed appointments versus attended appointments included lead
time (time between scheduling and the appointment), patient prior missed
appointments, cell phone ownership, tobacco use and the number of days since
last appointment. Models had a relatively high area under the curve for all 3
models (e.g., 0.86 for naïve Bayes classifier). Discussion: Patient
appointment adherence varies across clinics within a healthcare system. Data
analytics results demonstrate the value of existing clinical and operational
data to address important operational and management issues.
Conclusion: EHR data including patient and scheduling
information predicted the missed appointments of underserved populations in
urban CHCs. Our application of predictive modeling techniques helped prioritize
the design and implementation of interventions that may improve efficiency in
community health centers for more timely access to care. CHCs would benefit from
investing in the technical resources needed to make these data readily available
as a means to inform important operational and policy questions.
Background
User-centered design (UCD) is a powerful framework for creating useful, easy-to-use, and satisfying mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, the literature seldom reports the practical challenges of implementing UCD, particularly in the field of mHealth.
Objective
This study aims to characterize the practical challenges encountered and propose strategies when implementing UCD for mHealth.
Methods
Our multidisciplinary team implemented a UCD process to design and evaluate a mobile app for older adults with heart failure. During and after this process, we documented the challenges the team encountered and the strategies they used or considered using to address those challenges.
Results
We identified 12 challenges, 3 about UCD as a whole and 9 across the UCD stages of formative research, design, and evaluation. Challenges included the timing of stakeholder involvement, overcoming designers’ assumptions, adapting methods to end users, and managing heterogeneity among stakeholders. To address these challenges, practical recommendations are provided to UCD researchers and practitioners.
Conclusions
UCD is a gold standard approach that is increasingly adopted for mHealth projects. Although UCD methods are well-described and easily accessible, practical challenges and strategies for implementing them are underreported. To improve the implementation of UCD for mHealth, we must tell and learn from these traditionally untold stories.
The study findings show that PHR use had minimal impact on intermediate health outcomes and no significant impact on patient engagement among CAD patients.
Background: Every day, older adults living with heart failure make decisions regarding their health that may ultimately affect their disease trajectory. Experts describe these decisions as instances of naturalistic decision making influenced by the surrounding social and physical environment and involving shifting goals, high stakes, and the involvement of others. Objective: This study applied a naturalistic decision-making approach to better understand everyday decision making by older adults with heart failure. Methods: We present a cross-sectional qualitative field research study using a naturalistic decision-making conceptual model and critical incident technique to study health-related decision making. The study recruited 24 older adults with heart failure and 14 of their accompanying support persons from an ambulatory cardiology center. Critical incident interviews were performed and qualitatively analyzed to understand in depth how individuals made everyday health-related decisions. Results: White, male (66.7%), older adults' decision making accorded with a preliminary conceptual model of naturalistic decision making occurring in phases of monitoring, interpreting, and acting, both independently and in sequence, for various decisions. Analyses also uncovered that there are barriers and strategies affecting the performance of these phases, other actors can play important roles, and health decisions are made in the context of personal priorities, values, and emotions. Conclusions: Study findings lead to an expanded conceptual model of naturalistic decision making by older adults with heart failure. In turn, the model bears implications for future research and the design of interventions grounded in the realities of everyday decision making.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.