Impression cytology refers to the application of a cellulose acetate filter to the ocular surface to remove the superficial layers of the ocular surface epithelium. These cells can then be subjected to histological, immunohistological, or molecular analysis. Proper technique is essential as the number of cells sampled can vary considerably. Generally two to three layers of cells are removed in one application but deeper cells can be accessed by repeat application over the same site. Applications for impression cytology include diagnosing a wide range of ocular surface disorders, documenting sequential changes in the conjunctival and corneal surface over time, staging conjunctival squamous metaplasia, and monitoring effects of treatment. It is also a useful investigational tool for analysing ocular surface disease with immunostaining and DNA analysis. It is non-invasive, relatively easy to perform, and yields reliable information about the area sampled with minimal discomfort to the patient. Major ophthalmic centres should develop and introduce this technique into routine clinical practice. This is best achieved with a team approach including the ophthalmologist, pathologist, microbiologist, and the immunologist.

Choroidal detachment following corneal ulcer perforation is common and is more likely in larger corneal perforations. Preoperative B-scan should be considered in cases of large corneal perforations requiring therapeutic keratoplasty to document choroidal detachment, which if large may require drainage. Cyanoacrylate glue is an effective and safe method for sealing small corneal perforations. A vigil must be maintained for infection while the glue and bandage contact lens are in situ.

No abstract

No abstract

PurposeTo compare axial length (AL) with vitreous cavity length (VCL) in patients with keratoconus and to ascertain whether graft size can be tailored to reduce myopic refractive error in patients with keratoconus undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK).Patients and methodsThe AL and VCL were measured prospectively in patients with keratoconus not undergoing PK (Group 1) and in normal phakic, emmetropic individuals (Group 2). A retrospective analysis of these measurements in patients with keratoconus who had undergone PK (Group 3) was also performed. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was then correlated to size of donor buttons.ResultsKeratoconus patients tended to have a longer mean VCL than emmetropic normal individuals. The mean VCL of these patients (Group 1) was 16.49 mm±SD 1.13 compared to the mean VCL of 15.94 mm±SD 0.56 in normals (Group 2, P<0.0001). Patients with keratoconus who had an undersized graft showed reduced myopic refractive error compared to those with same size or oversized grafts.ConclusionVCL measurement is more accurate than AL measurement in deciding upon graft-host size disparity for corneal graft in patients with keratoconus. In patients with increased VCL, undersizing the donor button helps in reducing postoperative myopia. We recommend VCL measurement as part of the routine workup in all keratoconus patients undergoing corneal transplants.