Rabeprazole augments gastric mucus and mucin production in humans. However, its potential restorative impact on gastric mucus and mucin production impairment, resulting from administration of naproxen, remained to be explored. Therefore, we measured the content of mucus and mucin in gastric juice (GJ) before and after administration of naproxen with rabeprazole or placebo. The study was approved by HSC at KUMC and conducted in 21 asymptomatic, H. pylori-negative volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The content of gastric mucus in GJ, after exhaustive dialysis and complete lyophilization, was assessed gravimetrically, whereas the content of mucin was measured after its purification with equilibrium density-gradient ultracentrifugation in CsC1. Gastric mucus secretion during administration of naproxen with placebo declined significantly both in basal (by 44%; P < 0.001) and in pentagastrin-stimulated (by 35%; P < 0.001) conditions. Coadministration of rabeprazole significantly restored the naproxen-induced impairment in mucus production in basal conditions (by 47%; P < 0.01) and by 22% during stimulation with pentagastrin. Gastric mucin secretion during naproxen/placebo administration also declined significantly in both basal (by 39%; P < 0.01) and stimulated (by 49%; P = 0.003) conditions. Rabeprazole also significantly restored the naproxen-induced decline of gastric mucin output during pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (by 67%; P = 0.003) and by 40% in basal conditions (P = 0.05). The restorative capacity of rabeprazole on the quantitative impairment of gastric mucus and mucin during administration of naproxen may translate into a clinical benefit of protection of the upper alimentary tract from NSAID-related mucosal injury.
OBJECTIVES:Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contribute to the esophageal mucosal injury through its direct topical impact on the luminal aspect of the surface epithelium. Its indirect, systemic impact, however, on salivary component of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier remains to be explored. Therefore, salivary mucin secretion and viscosity at baseline and during naproxen-placebo, as well as naproxen-rabeprazole, administration were investigated.METHODS:Twenty-one asymptomatic volunteers were included in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover designed study. Salivary samples were obtained in basal and pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (6 mg/kg s.c.) mimicking the food-stimulated conditions. Patients received 7 days of naproxen-placebo or naproxen-rabeprazole with a 2-week washout period in between. Salivary mucin content and viscosity were measured before and after treatment using periodic acid/Schiff's methodology and Cone/Plate Digital Viscometer, respectively.RESULTS:The rate of salivary mucin secretion in basal condition declined by 32% during administration of naproxen-placebo (11.3±1.7 vs. 16.8±3.3 mg/h). Salivary mucin secretion in pentagastrin-stimulated condition declined significantly (by 34%) during the administration of naproxen-placebo (13.6±1.5 vs. 20.7±3.0 mg/h; P<0.05). Viscosity significantly decreased after naproxen-placebo administration in basal (by 60%) and stimulated conditions (by 56%) (P<0.001). Coadministration of rabeprazole at least partly restored the naproxen-induced decline of salivary mucin in basal condition (by 8%), and pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (by 30%).CONCLUSIONS:A significant decline of salivary mucin and viscosity during administration of naproxen may at least partly explain a propensity of patients on chronic therapy with NSAIDs to the development of esophageal mucosal injury and complications. In addition the trend to restorative capacity of rabeprazole on the quantitative impairment of salivary mucin during administration of naproxen may potentially translate into its tangible clinical benefit but it requires further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.