BackgroundSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a condition in which excessive levels of bacteria, mainly the colonic-type species are present in the small intestine. Recent data suggest that SIBO may contribute to the pathophysiology of Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of SIBO in patients with IBS.MethodsAdults with IBS based on Rome II criteria who had predominance of bloating and flatulence underwent a glucose breath test (GBT) to determine the presence of SIBO. Breath samples were obtained at baseline and at 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after ingestion of 50 g of glucose dissolved in 150 mL of water. Results of the glucose breath test, which measures hydrogen and methane levels in the breath, were considered positive for SIBO if 1) the hydrogen or methane peak was >20 ppm when the baseline was <10 ppm, or 2) the hydrogen or methane peak increased by 12 ppm when baseline was ≥10 ppm.ResultsNinety-eight patients were identified who underwent a GBT (mean age, 49 y; 78% female). Thirty-five patients (36%) had a positive GBT result suggestive of SIBO. A positive GBT result was more likely in patients >55 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-9.0) and in females (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1-14.5). Hydrogen was detected more frequently in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (OR, 8; 95% CI, 1.4-45), and methane was the main gas detected in patients with constipation-predominant IBS (OR, 8; 95% CI, 1.3-44). There was no significant correlation between the presence of SIBO and the predominant bowel pattern or concurrent use of tegaserod, proton pump inhibitors, or opiate analgesics.ConclusionsSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowth was present in a sizeable percentage of patients with IBS with predominance of bloating and flatulence. Older age and female sex were predictors of SIBO in patients with IBS. Identification of possible predictors of SIBO in patients with IBS could aid in the development of successful treatment plans.

Rabeprazole augments gastric mucus and mucin production in humans. However, its potential restorative impact on gastric mucus and mucin production impairment, resulting from administration of naproxen, remained to be explored. Therefore, we measured the content of mucus and mucin in gastric juice (GJ) before and after administration of naproxen with rabeprazole or placebo. The study was approved by HSC at KUMC and conducted in 21 asymptomatic, H. pylori-negative volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The content of gastric mucus in GJ, after exhaustive dialysis and complete lyophilization, was assessed gravimetrically, whereas the content of mucin was measured after its purification with equilibrium density-gradient ultracentrifugation in CsC1. Gastric mucus secretion during administration of naproxen with placebo declined significantly both in basal (by 44%; P < 0.001) and in pentagastrin-stimulated (by 35%; P < 0.001) conditions. Coadministration of rabeprazole significantly restored the naproxen-induced impairment in mucus production in basal conditions (by 47%; P < 0.01) and by 22% during stimulation with pentagastrin. Gastric mucin secretion during naproxen/placebo administration also declined significantly in both basal (by 39%; P < 0.01) and stimulated (by 49%; P = 0.003) conditions. Rabeprazole also significantly restored the naproxen-induced decline of gastric mucin output during pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (by 67%; P = 0.003) and by 40% in basal conditions (P = 0.05). The restorative capacity of rabeprazole on the quantitative impairment of gastric mucus and mucin during administration of naproxen may translate into a clinical benefit of protection of the upper alimentary tract from NSAID-related mucosal injury.

Esophageal manometry (EM) findings were reviewed in 14 (13 male) adults diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). One had complete nonperistaltic contractions (amplitude range = 30-180 mmHg) and incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), suggesting vigorous achalasia. After 6 months of steroid therapy the repeat EM showed near-normal findings. One had total aperistalsis with contraction amplitudes less than 10 mmHg and a weak LES pressure (8 mmHg), criteria suggesting scleroderma. Two had low-amplitude (<30 mmHg) nonperistaltic contractions limited to the mid-esophagus. Criteria for nutcracker esophagus were met in two patients. Isolated low LES pressure (<15 mmHg) was observed in four patients who were also receiving proton pump inhibitors, and the remainder had normal EM findings. Our results found that EE can mimic all the categories of EM disturbances, with approximately 50% of our patients having a major impairment of smooth muscle function. The EM abnormality can be reversed to normal in some cases with appropriate treatment for EE.