Fiber metal laminates (FML) are hybrid materials consisting of metal and composite layers. They have great mechanical and fatigue properties. However, interface between metal and composite layers can be critical for their final properties. In this paper, process of determination of some fracture parameters of this interface in unusual FML material is described. Experimental tests following ASTM norm were conducted using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB). However, due to asymmetry, fracture energy cannot be obtained directly from the force–displacement curve. Finite element method simulations were carried out using cohesive elements and cohesive surfaces approach. The cohesive behavior of interface layers were modelled using traction separation law. Key properties of this law were obtained—maximal traction and fracture energy. In this particular case cohesive approach was better in reflecting experimental results. Determined values can be used in later research tasks (like modelling big structures containing this material) as material properties. The presented approach can be used successfully to obtain fracture energy in cases of materials for which standard approach is insufficient.
Fibre metal laminates (FML) are layered materials consisting of both metal and reinforced composite layers. Due to numerous possibilities of configuration, constituent materials, etc., designing and testing such materials can be time- and cost-consuming. In addition to that, some parameters cannot be obtained directly from the experiment campaign. These problems are often overcome by using numerical simulation. In this article, the authors reviewed different approaches to finite element analysis of fibre metal laminates based on published articles and their own experiences. Many aspects of numerical modelling of FMLs can be similar to approaches used for classic laminates. However, in the case of fibre metal laminates, the interface between the metal and the composite layer is very relevant both in experimental and numerical regard. Approaches to modelling this interface have been widely discussed. Numerical simulations of FMLs are often complementary to experimental campaigns, so an experimental background is presented. Then, the software used in numerical analysis is discussed. In the next two chapters, both static and fatigue failure modelling are discussed including several key aspects like dimensionality of the model, approaches to the material model of constituents and holistic view of the material, level of homogenization, type of used finite elements, use of symmetry, and more. The static failure criteria used for both fibres and matrix are discussed along with different damage models for metal layers. In the chapter dedicated to adhesive interface composite—metal, different modelling strategies are discussed including cohesive element, cohesive surfaces, contact with damage formulation and usage of eXtended Finite Element Method. Also, different ways to assess the failure of this layer are described with particular attention to the Cohesive Zone Model with defined Traction–Separation Law. Furthermore, issues related to mixed-mode loading are presented. In the next chapter other aspects of numerical modelling are described like mesh sensitivity, friction, boundary conditions, steering, user-defined materials, and validation. The authors in this article try to evaluate the quality of the different approaches described based on literature review and own research.
The problem with composite rebars in the civil engineering industry is often described as the material’s brittleness while overloaded. To overcome this drawback, researchers pay attention to the pseudo-ductility effect. The paper presents four-point bending tests of pure unidirectional (UD) rods with additional composite layers obtained by filament winding and hand braiding techniques. Two types of core materials, glass FRP (fibre reinforced polymer) and carbon FRP, were used. Regarding the overwrapping material, the filament winding technique utilized carbon and glass roving reinforcement in the epoxy matrix, while in the case of hand braiding, the carbon fibre sleeve was applied with the epoxy matrix. Microstructural analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and computed tomography (CT) was performed to reveal the structural differences between the two proposed methods. Mechanical test results showed good material behaviour exhibiting the pseudo-ductility effect after the point of maximum force. The two applied overwrapping techniques had different influences on the pseudo-ductility effect. Microstructural investigation revealed differences between the groups of specimens that partially explain their different characters during mechanical testing.
This paper presents the experimental results of composite rebars based on GFRP manufactured by a pultrusion system. The bending and radial compression strength of rods was determined. The elastic modulus of GFRP rebars is significantly lower than for steel rebars, while the static flexural properties are higher. The microstructure of the selected rebars was studied and discussed in light of the obtained results—failure processes such as the delamination and fibers fracture can be observed. The bending fatigue test was performed under a constant load amplitude sinusoidal waveform. All rebars were subjected to fatigue tests under the R = 0.1 condition. As a result, the S-N curve was obtained, and basic fatigue characteristics were determined. The fatigue mechanism of bar failure under bending was further analyzed using SEM microscopy. It is worth noting that the failure and fracture mechanism plays a crucial role as a material quality indicator in the manufacturing process. The main mechanism of failure under static and cyclic loading during the bending test is widely discussed in this paper. The results obtained from fatigue tests encourage further analysis. The diametral compression test reflects the weakest nature of the composite materials based on the interlaminar compressive strength. The proposed methodology allows us to invariantly describe the experimental transversal strength of the composite materials. Considering the expected durability of the structure, the failure mechanism is likely to significantly improve their fatigue behavior under the influence of cyclic bending. The reasonable direction of searching for reinforcements of composite structures should be the improvement of the bearing capacity of the outer layers. In comparison with steel rebars (fatigue tensile test), the obtained results for GFRP are comparable in the HCF regime. It is worth noting that in the near fatigue endurance regime (2–5 × 106 cycles) both rebars exhibit similar behavior.
The paper presents a comparison of the results of the fatigue crack growth rate for raw rail steel, steel reinforced with composite material—CFRP—and also in the case of counteracting crack growth using the stop-hole technique, as well as with an application of an “anti-crack growth fluid”. All specimens were tested using constant load amplitude methods with a maximum loading of Fmax = 8 kN and stress ratio R = smin/smax = 0.1 in order to analyze the efficiency of different strategies of fatigue crack growth rate deceleration. It has been shown that the fatigue crack grows fastest in the case of the raw material and slowest in the case of “anti-crack growth fluid” application. Additionally, the study on fatigue fracture surfaces using light and scanning electron (SEM) microscopy to analyze the crack growth mechanism was carried out. As a result of fluid activity, the fatigue crack closure occurred and significantly decreased crack driving force and finally resulted in fatigue crack growth decrease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.