AimsMagnetic resonance (MR) imaging is widely used for diagnostic imaging in medicine as it is considered a safe alternative to ionizing radiation-based techniques. Recent reports on potential genotoxic effects of strong and fast switching electromagnetic gradients such as used in cardiac MR (CMR) have raised safety concerns. The aim of this study was to analyse DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in human blood lymphocytes before and after CMR examination.Methods and resultsIn 20 prospectively enrolled patients, peripheral venous blood was drawn before and after 1.5 T CMR scanning. After density gradient cell separation of blood samples, DNA DSBs in lymphocytes were quantified using immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometric analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used for statistical analysis. Immunofluorescence microscopic and flow cytometric analysis revealed a significant increase in median numbers of DNA DSBs in lymphocytes induced by routine 1.5 T CMR examination.ConclusionThe present findings indicate that CMR should be used with caution and that similar restrictions may apply as for X-ray-based and nuclear imaging techniques in order to avoid unnecessary damage of DNA integrity with potential carcinogenic effect.

No abstract

AimsTo evaluate the feasibility and image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) acquisition with a submillisievert fraction of effective radiation dose using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for noise reduction.Methods and resultsIn 42 patients undergoing standard low-dose (100–120 kV; 450–700 mA) and additional ultra-low-dose CCTA (80–100 kV; 150–210 mA) reconstructed with MBIR, segmental image quality was graded on a four-point scale [(i): non-evaluative, (ii): good, (iii): adequate, and (iv): excellent]. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated dividing left main artery (LMA) and right coronary artery (RCA) attenuation by the aortic root noise. Over a wide range of body mass index (18–40 kg/m2), the estimated median radiation dose exposure was 1.19 mSv [interquartile range (IQR): 1.07–1.30 mSv] for standard and 0.21 mSv (IQR: 0.18–0.23 mSv) for ultra-low-dose CCTA (P < 0.001). The median image quality score per segment was 3.5 (IQR: 3.0–4.0) in standard CCTA vs. 3.5 (IQR: 2.5–4.0) in ultra-low dose with MBIR (P = 0.29). Diagnostic image quality (scores 2–4) was found in 98.7 vs. 97.8% coronary segments (P = 0.36). Introduction of MBIR for ultra-low-dose CCTA resulted in a significant increase in SNR (P < 0.001) for LMA (from 15 ± 5 to 29 ± 7) and RCA (from 14 ± 4 to 27 ± 6) despite 82% dose reduction.ConclusionCoronary computed tomography angiography acquisition with diagnostic image quality is feasible at an ultra-low radiation dose of 0.21 mSv, e.g. in the range reported for a postero-anterior and lateral chest X-ray.

No abstract

To explore the feasibility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurement from low-dose contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography (CCTA) as this may obviate the need for an unenhanced CT scan. 52 patients underwent unenhanced cardiac CT and prospectively ECG triggered contrast enhanced CCTA (Discovery HD 750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The latter was acquired in single-source dual-energy mode [gemstone spectral imaging (GSI)]. Virtual unenhanced images were generated from GSI CCTA by monochromatic image reconstruction of 70 keV allowing selective iodine material suppression. CAC scores from virtual unenhanced CT were compared to standard unenhanced CT including a linear regression model. After iodine subtraction from the contrast enhanced CCTA the attenuation in the ascending aorta decreased significantly from 359 ± 61 to 54 ± 8 HU (P < 0.001), the latter comparing well to the value of 64 ± 55 HU found in the standard unenhanced CT (P = ns) confirming successful iodine subtraction. After introducing linear regression formula the mean values for Agatston, Volume and Mass scores of virtual unenhanced CT were 187 ± 321, 72 ± 114 mm(3), and 27 ± 46 mg/cm(3), comparing well to the values from standard unenhanced CT (187 ± 309, 72 ± 110 mm(3), and 27 ± 45 mg/cm(3)) yielding an excellent correlation (r = 0.96, r = 0.96, r = 0.92; P < 0.001). Mean estimated radiation dose revealed 0.83 ± 0.02 mSv from the unenhanced CT and 1.70 ± 0.53 mSv from the contrast enhanced CCTA. Single-source dual-energy scanning with GSI allows CAC quantification from low dose contrast enhanced CCTA by virtual iodine contrast subtraction.